Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
China Southern so cheap they wont deice >

China Southern so cheap they wont deice

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

China Southern so cheap they wont deice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2013, 06:13 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MacGuy2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Couch Potato
Posts: 470
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
Am I the only one thinking- Man, we have been wasting a huge amount of money and time on this whole deicing business- after seeing this? I saw that Russian Airbus video a few months ago, and now this. ***? I thought something like one-one-millionth of a centimeter of frost can reduce your lift by 800%. Maybe the deicing fluid industry is in bed with the FAA? Screw it, I'm not wasting any more time at the deice pad ever again. I'm going 'Chinese Style'!
Is "Chinese Style" the same as Air Florida style?

MG2
MacGuy2 is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 06:44 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default

Originally Posted by MacGuy2
Is "Chinese Style" the same as Air Florida style?

MG2
There was alot more wrong with Palm 90 than just skipping the 2nd deice.
N9373M is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 08:01 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captainv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Knuckle-dragging line pilot
Posts: 943
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
Am I the only one thinking- Man, we have been wasting a huge amount of money and time on this whole deicing business- after seeing this? I saw that Russian Airbus video a few months ago, and now this. ***? I thought something like one-one-millionth of a centimeter of frost can reduce your lift by 800%. Maybe the deicing fluid industry is in bed with the FAA? Screw it, I'm not wasting any more time at the deice pad ever again. I'm going 'Chinese Style'!
I'm glad Boeing and Airbus wings are so robust, but if this was a CRJ, you would've been front-page news.
captainv is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 11:09 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dashdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 433
Default

Originally Posted by N9373M
There was alot more wrong with Palm 90 than just skipping the 2nd deice.
Correct. The real problem wasn't ice on the wings, it was ice on the EPR probes due to the crew not turning on engine anti-ice. Actual thrust at T/O was something like 60%. Ice on the wings didn't help.
Dashdog is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 02:48 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: MD-11 Guru
Posts: 208
Cool

Originally Posted by Dashdog
Correct. The real problem wasn't ice on the wings, it was ice on the EPR probes due to the crew not turning on engine anti-ice. Actual thrust at T/O was something like 60%. Ice on the wings didn't help.

Between the power setting mentioned above and the MD-80 wing having issues, we have waaay too many procedures and derivatives of fluid formulas. Common sense, what? no! We need to deice every single aircraft with type IV safeco double deluxe industrial hold anytime Ewins says there could be a 5 minute delay due to frost for the night sort........and fly into the sort no matter what, even if there is 6 inches of clear ice in the forecast.....
MD11Simnerd is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 05:06 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

I work in Japan, not China mind you but I do fly in and out of China a lot. For what I have seen (and I couldn't care less, not defending anybody) airlines in China tend to be way too conservative in terms of their de-icing, I have seen them de ice even when there is no need to. I have a feeling there is a problem with this particular crew and not necessarily with the company's safety culture per say.
The Dominican is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 06:06 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
Correct. The real problem wasn't ice on the wings, it was ice on the EPR probes due to the crew not turning on engine anti-ice. Actual thrust at T/O was something like 60%. Ice on the wings didn't help.
The problem in this instance was a crew unfamiliar with icing conditions, who did a reverse thrust power back out of the gate and covered the engine probes with ice. They therefore had erroneously high EPR indications resulting in far reduced power settings. The first officer mentioned it twice on the roll but was ignored by the captain. Perfectly good jet hits the 14th Ave, bridge because crew were unfamiliar with deicing and departure procedures in icing conditions.

You have to wonder, with respect to CZ, what else they miss because they obviously do not understand the physics behind flying airplanes. Typical push button mentality of these fly-by-night airlines.

So, does ALPA have any input into what carriers we deadhead on? Isn't safety our number one priority (or is it VEBA, I get confused sometimes).
PicklePausePull is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:02 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,283
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
Am I the only one thinking- Man, we have been wasting a huge amount of money and time on this whole deicing business- after seeing this? I saw that Russian Airbus video a few months ago, and now this. ***? I thought something like one-one-millionth of a centimeter of frost can reduce your lift by 800%. Maybe the deicing fluid industry is in bed with the FAA? Screw it, I'm not wasting any more time at the deice pad ever again. I'm going 'Chinese Style'!
Leading edge devices are wonderful things, especially when they are heated.
trip is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:21 AM
  #79  
just past ETP
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Cruise Captain
Posts: 507
Default

add Aeroflot to your list.. when I was at Gemini we had a few airlines on our no-fly list, and those were two... As a side note, I flew into Almaty Kazakstan quite a bit and they'd always look at us strange when we wanted to de-ice our 747's when they had some frost on the wings... some would actually try to argue we didn't need it... sigh.
CATIII is online now  
Old 01-29-2013, 04:52 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCLCREW's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Assistant Greens Keeper
Posts: 1,011
Default

When I was at Polar we had the same problem with China Airlines... After the report the only Chinese airline allowed for DHDs was Cathay. I would suggest you push for the same.
Heck even Korean was off the list.
PCLCREW is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
1
09-14-2010 10:08 AM
30 From Bottom
Cargo
3
07-10-2010 01:17 AM
woodfinx
Hangar Talk
0
07-31-2009 06:12 AM
vagabond
Money Talk
1
10-22-2007 07:15 AM
TonyC
Major
0
01-24-2006 05:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices