FDX: Preferential Bidding
#51
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Hanging on by my little ratclaws...
Posts: 69
#52
Can we stop now?
"By now, most of you have heard about our company’s section 25 scheduling proposal. This did not come as a surprise to any of us, but still I find it disappointing. I say that because I can’t understand how a management team so interested in getting to know us could miss the mark by so large a margin. The question whether our Negotiating Team is considering allowing PBS on our property has been asked in many of our crew room briefs, and each time the answer was a definite no! Hopefully, by now they get it."
"By now, most of you have heard about our company’s section 25 scheduling proposal. This did not come as a surprise to any of us, but still I find it disappointing. I say that because I can’t understand how a management team so interested in getting to know us could miss the mark by so large a margin. The question whether our Negotiating Team is considering allowing PBS on our property has been asked in many of our crew room briefs, and each time the answer was a definite no! Hopefully, by now they get it."
#53
Can we stop now?
"By now, most of you have heard about our company’s section 25 scheduling proposal. This did not come as a surprise to any of us, but still I find it disappointing. I say that because I can’t understand how a management team so interested in getting to know us could miss the mark by so large a margin. The question whether our Negotiating Team is considering allowing PBS on our property has been asked in many of our crew room briefs, and each time the answer was a definite no! Hopefully, by now they get it."
"By now, most of you have heard about our company’s section 25 scheduling proposal. This did not come as a surprise to any of us, but still I find it disappointing. I say that because I can’t understand how a management team so interested in getting to know us could miss the mark by so large a margin. The question whether our Negotiating Team is considering allowing PBS on our property has been asked in many of our crew room briefs, and each time the answer was a definite no! Hopefully, by now they get it."
Just an inside fastball, a little "Chin Music" if you will to get a snap read on where we are "Unity" wise...........JMHO
#54
PBS is the standard in the airline industry today. PBS is the standard for the ALPA contract today. The issue is not the arrival of PBS at FedEx because it will be part of the next contract. The issue will be what FDX ALPA gets in return.
Those around long enough remember when there would never be a two pilot jet airliner. Even the 737 had a three pilot crew.
Those around long enough remember when there would never be a two pilot jet airliner. Even the 737 had a three pilot crew.
#55
PBS is the standard in the airline industry today. PBS is the standard for the ALPA contract today. The issue is not the arrival of PBS at FedEx because it will be part of the next contract. The issue will be what FDX ALPA gets in return.
Those around long enough remember when there would never be a two pilot jet airliner. Even the 737 had a three pilot crew.
Those around long enough remember when there would never be a two pilot jet airliner. Even the 737 had a three pilot crew.
#56
PBS was a concession forced upon them in BK. Don't see that around the corner cowboy.
#57
#60
PBS is the standard in the airline industry today. PBS is the standard for the ALPA contract today. The issue is not the arrival of PBS at FedEx because it will be part of the next contract. The issue will be what FDX ALPA gets in return.
Those around long enough remember when there would never be a two pilot jet airliner. Even the 737 had a three pilot crew.
Those around long enough remember when there would never be a two pilot jet airliner. Even the 737 had a three pilot crew.
Last edited by FLMD11CAPT; 10-31-2012 at 12:23 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post