How to improve JL's meet and greet program
#51
Let me take these one at a time...
3. I can see your point about hiring current airline pilots, but I just have a basic disagreement with giving a guy a second chance at a major airline career before we give the guys who have been working their asses off in the puppy mills out there their first opportunity. And why is a guy who flew right seat in the 75/76 more qualified than a guy who has been flying Captain on an RJ for the past 6 or 7 years in and out of ORD, ATL, DFW, or the guy who has been flying a C-17/C-5/ C130 in and out of the desert for the past 6 or 7 years. Because we aren't really getting the Captains at these other airlines. We're getting the FO's.
3. I can see your point about hiring current airline pilots, but I just have a basic disagreement with giving a guy a second chance at a major airline career before we give the guys who have been working their asses off in the puppy mills out there their first opportunity. And why is a guy who flew right seat in the 75/76 more qualified than a guy who has been flying Captain on an RJ for the past 6 or 7 years in and out of ORD, ATL, DFW, or the guy who has been flying a C-17/C-5/ C130 in and out of the desert for the past 6 or 7 years. Because we aren't really getting the Captains at these other airlines. We're getting the FO's.
The majority of these FOs at other majors (at least my classmates & friends), are only there because AA, DAL, UAL, CAL, NWA, etc ... were the FIRST one to offer them employment. Some have even been applying to FedEx for longer than they have been working at their major ...
My first choice was and still is FedEx ... but it wasn't the first job offer. Most take the first chance and go from there, why should that be a scarlet letter ?
But if FedEx will only hire furloughed guys, aren't you actually "giving a guy a second chance at a major airline career" and only getting FOs ? Contradictory information maybe ? I don't really understand hiring a furloughed FO but not an active list FO ... maybe it is just me ? Maybe the info is wrong ...
At least I figured out why after 10 years in the regional puppy mills and 7 years at a "major" ... my qualifications haven't met the criteria for an interview at FedEx.
I think I have a scarlet letter ....
Back to the original topic of improving the meet & greet process ...
Hope this perspective was enlightening ...
#52
ANOTHER 2 cents worth ... from the outside looking in ... FWIW
The majority of these FOs at other majors (at least my classmates & friends), are only there because AA, DAL, UAL, CAL, NWA, etc ... were the FIRST one to offer them employment. Some have even been applying to FedEx for longer than they have been working at their major ...
My first choice was and still is FedEx ... but it wasn't the first job offer. Most take the first chance and go from there, why should that be a scarlet letter ?
But if FedEx will only hire furloughed guys, aren't you actually "giving a guy a second chance at a major airline career" and only getting FOs ? Contradictory information maybe ? I don't really understand hiring a furloughed FO but not an active list FO ... maybe it is just me ? Maybe the info is wrong ...
At least I figured out why after 10 years in the regional puppy mills and 7 years at a "major" ... my qualifications haven't met the criteria for an interview at FedEx.
I think I have a scarlet letter ....
Back to the original topic of improving the meet & greet process ...
Hope this perspective was enlightening ...
The majority of these FOs at other majors (at least my classmates & friends), are only there because AA, DAL, UAL, CAL, NWA, etc ... were the FIRST one to offer them employment. Some have even been applying to FedEx for longer than they have been working at their major ...
My first choice was and still is FedEx ... but it wasn't the first job offer. Most take the first chance and go from there, why should that be a scarlet letter ?
But if FedEx will only hire furloughed guys, aren't you actually "giving a guy a second chance at a major airline career" and only getting FOs ? Contradictory information maybe ? I don't really understand hiring a furloughed FO but not an active list FO ... maybe it is just me ? Maybe the info is wrong ...
At least I figured out why after 10 years in the regional puppy mills and 7 years at a "major" ... my qualifications haven't met the criteria for an interview at FedEx.
I think I have a scarlet letter ....
Back to the original topic of improving the meet & greet process ...
Hope this perspective was enlightening ...
#53
I thought part of the reason not to hire legacy pilots was also due to the fact that back in the 90īs and possibly 80īs, we had a lot of people hired here from the legacies and later quit and went back to the legacies. Of course, itīs a different ballgame now.
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 503
Walk your buddy
Yeah it's painful but if you want to help your bud, and he/she wants the job you can make it happen. It is one more hoop to jump through but not a particularly difficult one. If it is worth a day out of your life to JS in and out and your buddy wants it bad enough to drive/fly to MEM, then together the two of you have shown dedication and desire to the ACPs. Also, it allows the ACPs to tie the two of you together, make sure your sponsoree knows that if they screw up or cause problems it will fall back on you. You will lose your right to sponsor for "X" amount of time, etc.
I'd like to see a last look cut list posted on-line. Everyone who has been through the wickets and is waiting for Jack's blessing should have their names posted on the last look list so the fellows can QC for "tools". It's not particularly difficult for tools to slip under the door (see I'm here ). Guys should have the perverbial "black ball" to use. If you feel strongly that someone should not be here then you can go personally to the ACP and voice your opinion. Usually the first time you know someone is applying is when you see their picture on the new hires page. While there probably would not be many weeded out, but it might save us the same 5 or 6 problem children every year.
I'd like to see a last look cut list posted on-line. Everyone who has been through the wickets and is waiting for Jack's blessing should have their names posted on the last look list so the fellows can QC for "tools". It's not particularly difficult for tools to slip under the door (see I'm here ). Guys should have the perverbial "black ball" to use. If you feel strongly that someone should not be here then you can go personally to the ACP and voice your opinion. Usually the first time you know someone is applying is when you see their picture on the new hires page. While there probably would not be many weeded out, but it might save us the same 5 or 6 problem children every year.
#57
If you were at FDX during negotitations of 95-98, Remember all the FCIF's and emails from ACP's back then? Remember how adamant they all were telling us that we weren't losing anyone and no one was going back to the former carriers? Oh I do remember one specific email siting one pilot who quit in 98 and wanted to return...............
#58
It makes no sense to me as to why you wouldn't hire a pilot from another airline that's been a Captain in a glass/FMS airplane. A 737NG Capt that took early retirement from DAL at 50, for example, would be an excellent newhire 757/300/11 F/O and eventually Capt during the next 10+ years. If you truly cared about flight safety, wouldn't you want to hire someone with that kind of experience?
#59
When we announced we were hiring directly into the Right seat of the MD-11, (purple Nugget program, whatever that was suppose to mean)................it baffled me that we weren't interviewing UPS, World or Gemni Pilots Pilots who were current in the MD-11.......followed by current United ,Delta, American, NWA or CAL Pilots who were current on INTL Heavy equipment.................Who better?
A pilot I know got hired directly into the roght seat of the MD11 and I am glad for him, but he had no part 121 experience and NO Heavy experience and NO International experience and apparently struggled somewhat through training. I have heard we hired a few RJ pilots directly into the MD-11 because they had Glass and FMS experience. I am sure they were good guys too but if I was doing the hiring..........the guys/gals with 121, Heavy, INTL
experience would be on the top on the list, but that is just me........
FDX Right seaters in the MD-11 (especially INTL) do not get many landings each month, due to RFO pairings, High Min Captains etc........Not a place for a new pilot (with little Heavy INTL time) to get a plethora of App/landing experience.
The bulk of our accidents/incidents on the MD-11 have been on landing.
You would think that we would hire NEWBies with the absolute most Heavy INTL experience to go to the MD-11...............especailly since we have over 10,000 applications to pick from, ie we have the PICK of the litter so to speak.
I just re-read my Capts "chastising letter" from the SCP............I guess I'm still the problem......
Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 11-07-2006 at 07:40 AM.
#60
It makes no sense to me as to why you wouldn't hire a pilot from another airline that's been a Captain in a glass/FMS airplane. A 737NG Capt that took early retirement from DAL at 50, for example, would be an excellent newhire 757/300/11 F/O and eventually Capt during the next 10+ years. If you truly cared about flight safety, wouldn't you want to hire someone with that kind of experience?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post