Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Cautious words from Mr. Smith... >

Cautious words from Mr. Smith...

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Cautious words from Mr. Smith...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2012, 02:34 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by 4A2B
exactly! do you think that large chasm of the unknown would have led the Company to settle the CBA to date??? not and we are 6% richer while we wait for the air to clear.
I would have preferred the European "SIBA" that we sold the company for that 6%.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 02:42 PM
  #22  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
I would have preferred the European "SIBA" that we sold the company for that 6%.

I concur. I could care less about the $$ (almost). Instead, I want things fixed in the contract. But we seem to give away any and all leverage; never to be regained.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 04:57 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFW_MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
Default

Originally Posted by iarapilot
I concur. I could care less about the $$ (almost). Instead, I want things fixed in the contract. But we seem to give away any and all leverage; never to be regained.
Can one of you who keeps beating the dead horse of "giving away any and all leverage" please do us all a favor?

Please list, specifically, what you believe the company would have offered us (our negotiators) in exchange for the CGN FDA if we had "held out" and not just "given away" that leverage.

Please don't include the 6% pay raise, FDA LOA "enhancements", or any other improvement or additional benefit (Safety programs) that we actually DID get in this current CBA.

Also, while you're at it, please list all concessions that we gave back to the company during that negotiation.

Thanks in advance.
AFW_MD11 is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:11 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
Can one of you who keeps beating the dead horse of "giving away any and all leverage" please do us all a favor?

...

Also, while you're at it, please list all concessions that we gave back to the company during that negotiation.

Thanks in advance.
Uhhhh....Just off the top of my head, the sick leave policy was changed. And, not in our favor. By "our", I mean the line pilots.
Busboy is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:18 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
Can one of you who keeps beating the dead horse of "giving away any and all leverage" please do us all a favor?

Please list, specifically, what you believe the company would have offered us (our negotiators) in exchange for the CGN FDA if we had "held out" and not just "given away" that leverage.

Please don't include the 6% pay raise, FDA LOA "enhancements", or any other improvement or additional benefit (Safety programs) that we actually DID get in this current CBA.

Also, while you're at it, please list all concessions that we gave back to the company during that negotiation.

Thanks in advance.
In response to a post that said we got 6% I said I would prefer the "Siba". That means I would prefer the extra bodies, the extra flying, and the extra paid dead heads that we gave up for 2 3% raises. The efficiencies we gave the company may or may not have been leverage but they were good paying trips and bodies on the list below me.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:41 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Default

The thread is about cautious words from Mr. Smith. Instead of looking back to gripe, we would be better served to look forward. What actions will be taken at Express this fall to increase margins and how will they effect us?
CAVU is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:02 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 260
Default Past and present

Originally Posted by CAVU
The thread is about cautious words from Mr. Smith. Instead of looking back to gripe, we would be better served to look forward. What actions will be taken at Express this fall to increase margins and how will they effect us?
Past:

They needed the FDA LOA to get CGN up and running. Lots of leverage. Nhuge savings forme company, and we gave up bodies for that...less needed for manning.

Didn't address 4a2b. Still can happen, still weak language and it has freebies attached(777 untouchable)

Accepted fares not addressed.

We negotiated for a safety program the FAA was going to force on FDX anyhow.

FDA package wasn't negotiated for the most part, the company came back to ALPA and offered most of what we have now...we did very minor improvements on their offer.

We have no move back package exit plan to return. Coming out we get 30 hotel days and some money to defray moving costs - 30 percent less than what they got for Subic I might add.

Lots of stuff left on table, and 4a2b coming back easily recoups the 6% pay raise.

Present:

In work, restructure of fleet underway, 767 coming in, retiring planes already in storage...probably some retirement offers coming, and those positions won't be filled or absorbed into other jobs, (don't hold your breath for that to apply to pilots)...more work efficiencies. Getting rid of all the ACPs saved some money, and utilizing reserves more efficiently...and other subtle things probably already being talked about with our "transparent" MEC...

Last edited by HKFlyr; 06-22-2012 at 06:03 PM. Reason: Grammar
HKFlyr is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:09 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 482
Default

Originally Posted by HKFlyr
Past:

They needed the FDA LOA to get CGN up and running. Lots of leverage. Nhuge savings forme company, and we gave up bodies for that...less needed for manning.

Didn't address 4a2b. Still can happen, still weak language and it has freebies attached(777 untouchable)

Accepted fares not addressed.

We negotiated for a safety program the FAA was going to force on FDX anyhow.

FDA package wasn't negotiated for the most part, the company came back to ALPA and offered most of what we have now...we did very minor improvements on their offer.

We have no move back package exit plan to return. Coming out we get 30 hotel days and some money to defray moving costs - 30 percent less than what they got for Subic I might add.

Lots of stuff left on table, and 4a2b coming back easily recoups the 6% pay raise.

Present:

In work, restructure of fleet underway, 767 coming in, retiring planes already in storage...probably some retirement offers coming, and those positions won't be filled or absorbed into other jobs, (don't hold your breath for that to apply to pilots)...more work efficiencies. Getting rid of all the ACPs saved some money, and utilizing reserves more efficiently...and other subtle things probably already being talked about with our "transparent" MEC...
What does 777 untouchable mean?
viperdriver is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 09:39 PM
  #29  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
Can one of you who keeps beating the dead horse of "giving away any and all leverage" please do us all a favor?

Please list, specifically, what you believe the company would have offered us (our negotiators) in exchange for the CGN FDA if we had "held out" and not just "given away" that leverage.

Please don't include the 6% pay raise, FDA LOA "enhancements", or any other improvement or additional benefit (Safety programs) that we actually DID get in this current CBA.

Also, while you're at it, please list all concessions that we gave back to the company during that negotiation.

Thanks in advance.
Sorry to "beat a dead horse". I was just agreeing with another post. And it does seem that we dont learn from history, therefore the reminder of our lost leverage. IMO of course.

And I dont know what the Company would have specifically offered us for the CGN FDA because I dont have a crystal ball. We never waited long enough to find out. But if they offered us nothing and were not able to open CGN under the then present terms of our contract, I would say that that gave us more leverage.

And, someone else has given a list of perceived concessions.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 12:18 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Default

I will try my hand at looking into the crystal ball: The re-inventing of flight operations is already well underway. That means hiring non-seniority holders as professional instructors, ACP's, tech pilots, etc and shortening the length of training. The right-sizing and modernization of the fleet is also underway. So the announcements planned for this Fall will need to go further to achieve the stated two thirds of the increase in margins desired. I expect that means changes in system form, such as eliminating the day sort at regional hubs, or more dramatically, changing the product offerings and eliminating the day sort altogether i.e., truck all domestic deferred.
CAVU is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
minitour
Military
16
10-23-2010 10:05 AM
DLax85
Cargo
19
03-04-2009 05:36 AM
Huck
Cargo
33
10-27-2008 12:06 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
1
12-09-2007 09:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices