???? UPS July Recalls ????
#31
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Front Seat
Posts: 59
New rumor.................No more recalls until 2013. I guess the lifting of the JA/Open time ban is working. Should of gone to school to be a Proctologist. Getting in 18 holes a day takes on a very new meaning.................at least it is steady work/career.
#33
#34
Oh wait...they all are, and they do.
#35
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Personally I like the FedEx 4a2b clause. And not because I'm a UPS furloughee. But one thing I have figured out after a brief 5 year civilian aviation career with 4 airlines, 5 aircraft types and 2 furloughs - is stability of the pilot supply/demand helps every pilot in the industry in the long run. Whenever there is a dump of pilots onto the market after a furlough, our collective "value" takes a dump too - for all commercial pilots, worldwide. And you can bet airlines managements are better able to exploit our lower value in a down market than pilot groups can attempt to make up in any sort of up market.
#36
Personally I like the FedEx 4a2b clause. And not because I'm a UPS furloughee. But one thing I have figured out after a brief 5 year civilian aviation career with 4 airlines, 5 aircraft types and 2 furloughs - is stability of the pilot supply/demand helps every pilot in the industry in the long run. Whenever there is a dump of pilots onto the market after a furlough, our collective "value" takes a dump too - for all commercial pilots, worldwide. And you can bet airlines managements are better able to exploit our lower value in a down market than pilot groups can attempt to make up in any sort of up market.
Last edited by BrownClown; 07-08-2012 at 07:48 AM. Reason: Penguins
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Neither layoffs or 4a2b is desirable .
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
I'm not sure why UPS would "overhire" just so they could stay in 4A2b, perpetually. What would be the advantage of doing that? Paying benefits to unnecessary employees?
You guys do understand that FDX's 4A2b, is just a reduction in minimum credit hours per month? In other words, we get the same rate/hr...Just less of them. Sure, during 4A2b, we get paid for less hours/month, but you get more days off.
So, I don't have a problem with the concept of 4A2b...That is, shared pain to keep guys off the street. But, I do have a major problem in the way it was instituted at FDX. As in, some seats, bases or fleets shared little or no pain at all, no limit on carryover trips(allowing some crewmembers to continue to earn 110hrs+ each month while others were earning 60+/-), etc.
I think 4A2b can be a good thing, with the proper language that protects the pilot group from both, management abuse and themselves.
You guys do understand that FDX's 4A2b, is just a reduction in minimum credit hours per month? In other words, we get the same rate/hr...Just less of them. Sure, during 4A2b, we get paid for less hours/month, but you get more days off.
So, I don't have a problem with the concept of 4A2b...That is, shared pain to keep guys off the street. But, I do have a major problem in the way it was instituted at FDX. As in, some seats, bases or fleets shared little or no pain at all, no limit on carryover trips(allowing some crewmembers to continue to earn 110hrs+ each month while others were earning 60+/-), etc.
I think 4A2b can be a good thing, with the proper language that protects the pilot group from both, management abuse and themselves.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Exactly, putting more pilots on the payroll to stay in 4A2b is a bad business decision. Your fixed expenses per pilot stays exactly the same (vacation, sick bank, retirement (+), health insurance, training, and anything else you can think of) and your productivity per pilot goes way down. While the decison to cut someone loose instantly cuts fixed costs and increases productivity.
Last edited by FDXLAG; 07-08-2012 at 09:44 AM.
#40
Exactly, putting more pilots on the payroll to stay in 4A2b is a bad business decision. Your fixed expenses per pilot stays exactly the same (vacation, sick bank, retirement (+), health insurance, training, and anything else you can think of) and your productivity per pilot goes way down. While the decison to cut someone loose instantly cuts fixed costs and increases productivity.
I think this manning model helps fill the FDAs with new hires. Think about the poolies who I'm sure are being told, "We have a HKG/CGN slot in 3 weeks or you can wait until we stop buying up lines. Could be 3-6 months if the economy cooperates, maybe longer."
A side benefit is DPs and other nasty pairings are more likely to be flown when hours are scarce. Fewer sick calls?
They might also be surprised by the current slowdown in shipments. That's their story and they're sticking to it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post