Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
???? UPS July Recalls ???? >

???? UPS July Recalls ????

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

???? UPS July Recalls ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2012, 11:53 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Front Seat
Posts: 59
Default

New rumor.................No more recalls until 2013. I guess the lifting of the JA/Open time ban is working. Should of gone to school to be a Proctologist. Getting in 18 holes a day takes on a very new meaning.................at least it is steady work/career.
Shockwaves is offline  
Old 07-06-2012, 01:11 PM
  #32  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Furloughed by Brown
Posts: 3
Default

Think it is time to consider a career change. Probably decrease the stress level dramatically.

Hope this is not true. I am lucky to have the Reserves but bumming continues to get more difficult.
SlickTiger is offline  
Old 07-06-2012, 01:53 PM
  #33  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by Shockwaves
Should of gone to school to be a Proctologist. Getting in 18 holes a day takes on a very new meaning.................at least it is steady work/career.
That could bring the definition of the "Brown Stain" to a hole new level ...



CactusCrew is offline  
Old 07-06-2012, 05:30 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by Shockwaves
New rumor.................No more recalls until 2013. I guess the lifting of the JA/Open time ban is working. Should of gone to school to be a Proctologist. Getting in 18 holes a day takes on a very new meaning.................at least it is steady work/career.
Of course Europe isn't on the rim of the bowl, China isn't slowing, manufacturing in the U.S. hasn't dropped off, unemployment isn't up, and Fed Ex's profits aren't off and UPS doesn't step over dollars to pick up dimes and do things out of spite and desire to control...

Oh wait...they all are, and they do.
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 07-07-2012, 05:02 PM
  #35  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Default

Personally I like the FedEx 4a2b clause. And not because I'm a UPS furloughee. But one thing I have figured out after a brief 5 year civilian aviation career with 4 airlines, 5 aircraft types and 2 furloughs - is stability of the pilot supply/demand helps every pilot in the industry in the long run. Whenever there is a dump of pilots onto the market after a furlough, our collective "value" takes a dump too - for all commercial pilots, worldwide. And you can bet airlines managements are better able to exploit our lower value in a down market than pilot groups can attempt to make up in any sort of up market.
geeitup1 is offline  
Old 07-08-2012, 07:46 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownClown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Brown ones
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by geeitup1
Personally I like the FedEx 4a2b clause. And not because I'm a UPS furloughee. But one thing I have figured out after a brief 5 year civilian aviation career with 4 airlines, 5 aircraft types and 2 furloughs - is stability of the pilot supply/demand helps every pilot in the industry in the long run. Whenever there is a dump of pilots onto the market after a furlough, our collective "value" takes a dump too - for all commercial pilots, worldwide. And you can bet airlines managements are better able to exploit our lower value in a down market than pilot groups can attempt to make up in any sort of up market.
Then we may as well take a giant paycut because UPS will figure out a way/excuse to stay in 4a2b indefinitely. (of course I personally don't advocate either with this company)

Last edited by BrownClown; 07-08-2012 at 07:48 AM. Reason: Penguins
BrownClown is offline  
Old 07-08-2012, 07:53 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by BrownClown
Then we may as well take a giant paycut because UPS will figure out a way/excuse to stay in 4a2b indefinitely. (of course I personally don't advocate either with this company)
Exactly. They will just over hire or soak up short staffing as they are now to stay in the 4a2b mode. They will rotate it thru the fleet types so that people will never have a full year. They will then offer stabilization of income thru an across the board compensation reduction, then they will start the cycle all over again.
Neither layoffs or 4a2b is desirable .
757upspilot is offline  
Old 07-08-2012, 09:16 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

I'm not sure why UPS would "overhire" just so they could stay in 4A2b, perpetually. What would be the advantage of doing that? Paying benefits to unnecessary employees?

You guys do understand that FDX's 4A2b, is just a reduction in minimum credit hours per month? In other words, we get the same rate/hr...Just less of them. Sure, during 4A2b, we get paid for less hours/month, but you get more days off.

So, I don't have a problem with the concept of 4A2b...That is, shared pain to keep guys off the street. But, I do have a major problem in the way it was instituted at FDX. As in, some seats, bases or fleets shared little or no pain at all, no limit on carryover trips(allowing some crewmembers to continue to earn 110hrs+ each month while others were earning 60+/-), etc.

I think 4A2b can be a good thing, with the proper language that protects the pilot group from both, management abuse and themselves.
Busboy is offline  
Old 07-08-2012, 09:31 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Exactly, putting more pilots on the payroll to stay in 4A2b is a bad business decision. Your fixed expenses per pilot stays exactly the same (vacation, sick bank, retirement (+), health insurance, training, and anything else you can think of) and your productivity per pilot goes way down. While the decison to cut someone loose instantly cuts fixed costs and increases productivity.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 07-08-2012 at 09:44 AM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 07-08-2012, 10:38 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Exactly, putting more pilots on the payroll to stay in 4A2b is a bad business decision. Your fixed expenses per pilot stays exactly the same (vacation, sick bank, retirement (+), health insurance, training, and anything else you can think of) and your productivity per pilot goes way down. While the decison to cut someone loose instantly cuts fixed costs and increases productivity.
The company has avoided the higher BLGs, in most seats, that they were known for before 4a2b was used. The periodic high cost of draft and volunteer has been replaced with buy ups when needed. No rush to train at off site locations and pay flexes draft as the economy or retirements pick up. There is also the part time nature of contract instructors that limit their extra use.

I think this manning model helps fill the FDAs with new hires. Think about the poolies who I'm sure are being told, "We have a HKG/CGN slot in 3 weeks or you can wait until we stop buying up lines. Could be 3-6 months if the economy cooperates, maybe longer."

A side benefit is DPs and other nasty pairings are more likely to be flown when hours are scarce. Fewer sick calls?

They might also be surprised by the current slowdown in shipments. That's their story and they're sticking to it.
Gunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SLPII
Cargo
231
02-08-2017 10:25 PM
Priority 3
Cargo
6
04-12-2012 04:02 AM
Cujo
Cargo
4
10-01-2007 10:08 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
23
07-10-2006 06:19 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
16
11-23-2005 07:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices