Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Fly Now/Grieve Later??? >

FDX - Fly Now/Grieve Later???

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Fly Now/Grieve Later???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2012, 11:39 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFW_MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
Default

Originally Posted by pipe
I got off the phone with contract enforcement on two separate occasions feeling as if I had just spoken with management or CRS. Basically I got, " yeah, I agree with you but that's not how the company interprets it". Isn't that the whole point of their existence???

PIPE
If it's something new that hasn't been grieved/arbitrated before, then yes - you have every right to ask Contract Enforcement to file a grievance.

If it's something that's already been grieved/arbitrated before and the "interpretation" has been decided (for both sides), then no - you/we're stuck with that result (until we re-negotiate a different deal/language)
AFW_MD11 is offline  
Old 06-08-2012, 01:34 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Perm11FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: MD11 Kitchen Bi*ch
Posts: 263
Default

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
If it's something that's already been grieved/arbitrated before and the "interpretation" has been decided (for both sides), then no - you/we're stuck with that result (until we re-negotiate a different deal/language)
Agreed, AFW, but we are stuck with a majority of folks that think "I'll never bid there" or "I'll never have to grieve an issue" that will never vote to change it. I predict 32% would support a change, the Kool-Aid bunch will march forward with their 60%+ majority.
Perm11FO is offline  
Old 06-08-2012, 03:44 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Coffee Bitch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by ROSSI
If you've ever placed a call to "Contract Enforcement" (Sir "D"), you would not only be disappointed in the "enforcement" enthusiasm Sir "D" exudes. After the call terminates, you begin to wonder how much purple is giving him under the table and what pictures does he have (and of who) that prevents him from getting sacked.

Rossi, My experience both times I spoke with SIR D. How this guy keeps his job is a mystery to me. He works for US not the other way around, maybe it should be explained to him by someone in ALPA power.
Coffee Bitch is offline  
Old 06-08-2012, 04:10 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flextodaline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: moving target
Posts: 385
Default

Scheds sees the contract as black and white, There are "directives" from their Sr. manager (JK) on HIS interpretation (with the help of Contract Admin) of most issues in the CBA. Scheds goes into a situation pre-armed with what they can and can't do. It is up to us as PROFESSIONAL individuals to make sure the scheduler completely advises us of what they are assigning us, and we need to repeat that assignment back and make sure that we document the time of the call, and the name of the scheduler we speak with. Then, as PROFESSIONALS we need to fly the pairing, or do the standby pairing to the best of our abilities without EVER compromising safety, or flying fatigued. Once complete, file the grievance with as MUCH detail as possible, and without any emotional overtones. I have seen this process work, and I have seen scheds get caught with their pants down......that being said, it will continue to be an uphill battle until we get a contract with language that is clear and unambiguous. As unpalatable as this might seem to some, change won't happen overnight, but if we keep chipping away at some of the nonsense that scheds tries to pull, we'll eventually arm our union with enough ammo to fight back and effect change.
flextodaline is offline  
Old 06-08-2012, 05:22 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MeXC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
World Peace Now.

Just wanted to post something AFW couldnt possibly get angry about while complaining about others being angry.
Tops. Sorry I quoted your whole message though...
MeXC is offline  
Old 06-08-2012, 02:37 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by flextodaline
Scheds sees the contract as black and white, There are "directives" from their Sr. manager (JK) on HIS interpretation (with the help of Contract Admin) of most issues in the CBA. Scheds goes into a situation pre-armed with what they can and can't do. It is up to us as PROFESSIONAL individuals to make sure the scheduler completely advises us of what they are assigning us, and we need to repeat that assignment back and make sure that we document the time of the call, and the name of the scheduler we speak with. Then, as PROFESSIONALS we need to fly the pairing, or do the standby pairing to the best of our abilities without EVER compromising safety, or flying fatigued. Once complete, file the grievance with as MUCH detail as possible, and without any emotional overtones. I have seen this process work, and I have seen scheds get caught with their pants down......that being said, it will continue to be an uphill battle until we get a contract with language that is clear and unambiguous. As unpalatable as this might seem to some, change won't happen overnight, but if we keep chipping away at some of the nonsense that scheds tries to pull, we'll eventually arm our union with enough ammo to fight back and effect change.
...sound guidance.

New guys, read and heed.

Slow and steady will win the race.
DLax85 is offline  
Old 06-09-2012, 06:27 AM
  #27  
Fill'er Up Again
 
FrankTheTank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,090
Default

Originally Posted by flextodaline
Scheds sees the contract as black and white, There are "directives" from their Sr. manager (JK) on HIS interpretation (with the help of Contract Admin) of most issues in the CBA. Scheds goes into a situation pre-armed with what they can and can't do. It is up to us as PROFESSIONAL individuals to make sure the scheduler completely advises us of what they are assigning us, and we need to repeat that assignment back and make sure that we document the time of the call, and the name of the scheduler we speak with. Then, as PROFESSIONALS we need to fly the pairing, or do the standby pairing to the best of our abilities without EVER compromising safety, or flying fatigued. Once complete, file the grievance with as MUCH detail as possible, and without any emotional overtones. I have seen this process work, and I have seen scheds get caught with their pants down......that being said, it will continue to be an uphill battle until we get a contract with language that is clear and unambiguous. As unpalatable as this might seem to some, change won't happen overnight, but if we keep chipping away at some of the nonsense that scheds tries to pull, we'll eventually arm our union with enough ammo to fight back and effect change.
Good advice.. But I would add that as of recent there have been many new schedulers in and out in the last 2 years; so some of that experience has been lost and is being rebuilt. So there have been a couple of times as of late that, they needed a polite reminder. Also when they are desperate, they will try to pull a fast one. Had that recently. Tried to convert my reserve period inside of 18 hours.

So when you think they are WRONG. Politely question but when they don't budge, fly it and then grieve. Provided you are safe and legal.

FYI...YMMV
FrankTheTank is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
clipperstall
Part 91 and Low Time
24
01-11-2011 05:58 PM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
8
04-02-2010 09:08 AM
covsting76
Military
11
01-14-2010 05:19 PM
hotshot
Hangar Talk
11
09-03-2007 10:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices