Another denied 777 Jumpseat
#31
For those hoping for eventual release to self help you really don't know what some think it means.
They would help themselves to as much draft and vacation buyback as possible. And please, don't crowd them on those long legs.....
They would help themselves to as much draft and vacation buyback as possible. And please, don't crowd them on those long legs.....
#32
Well, excu-u-u-u-u-use ME!
I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...
I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.
Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.
I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...
.
I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...
I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.
Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.
I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...
.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Great suggestion, do you have the rest of the details to make an informed poll?
Some of you guys are so quick to support half baked campaigns, this guy might deserve every bit if this criticism, but without factual info and more importantly being handled in the proper channels this is nothing more than a pi$$ing contest.
Maybe we should debate fueling choices or diverts or any other decision a PIC makes. If it is a forgone conclusion that making your choice to deny a jumpseat then lets make it fair and open them all up without CA permission? What is the point of this system if the answer to a ride request should always be yes? according to some of you. Oh, that would take away CA Authority...
Some of you guys are so quick to support half baked campaigns, this guy might deserve every bit if this criticism, but without factual info and more importantly being handled in the proper channels this is nothing more than a pi$$ing contest.
Maybe we should debate fueling choices or diverts or any other decision a PIC makes. If it is a forgone conclusion that making your choice to deny a jumpseat then lets make it fair and open them all up without CA permission? What is the point of this system if the answer to a ride request should always be yes? according to some of you. Oh, that would take away CA Authority...
I dont have a problem with the original post, I am a big enough boy to know there may be more to the story. Rumors are this is not an isolated incident but by all means lets (apostraphe ignored on purpose) not talk about it.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Well, excu-u-u-u-u-use ME!
I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...
I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.
Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.
I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...
.
I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...
I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.
Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.
I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...
.
#36
Well, excu-u-u-u-u-use ME!
I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...
I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.
Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.
I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...
.
I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...
I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.
Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.
I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...
.
So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".
If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Most of the posts in this thread don't seem to be suggesting taking action to compromise Captain's authority. I also support his authority to say "no". I would oppose any "official" sanction against this captain for that very reason (to include Pro-standards).
So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".
If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".
If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
#38
Most of the posts in this thread don't seem to be suggesting taking action to compromise Captain's authority. I also support his authority to say "no". I would oppose any "official" sanction against this captain for that very reason (to include Pro-standards).
So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".
If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".
If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
The Captain get's to make the decision, he also has to live with it.
#39
I'm sure he'd be fine with it. I don't see a problem here.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Yes, that would be perfectly acceptable and within his rights. I'm sure that he'll understand the identical rationale used by other pilots when he is denied the jumpseat on every flight someone else decides the cockpit is too full.
I'm sure he'd be fine with it. I don't see a problem here.
I'm sure he'd be fine with it. I don't see a problem here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post