Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Another denied 777 Jumpseat >

Another denied 777 Jumpseat

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Another denied 777 Jumpseat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2012, 11:03 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

For those hoping for eventual release to self help you really don't know what some think it means.

They would help themselves to as much draft and vacation buyback as possible. And please, don't crowd them on those long legs.....
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:11 AM
  #32  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus

I guess it really is "The Jerk".

Well, excu-u-u-u-u-use ME!


I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...

I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.

Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.

I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:32 AM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Default

What if this capt said no to every pilot jumpseating every flight....would that be ok? After all he is the PIC..........
repoman is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:40 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by 4A2B
Great suggestion, do you have the rest of the details to make an informed poll?

Some of you guys are so quick to support half baked campaigns, this guy might deserve every bit if this criticism, but without factual info and more importantly being handled in the proper channels this is nothing more than a pi$$ing contest.

Maybe we should debate fueling choices or diverts or any other decision a PIC makes. If it is a forgone conclusion that making your choice to deny a jumpseat then lets make it fair and open them all up without CA permission? What is the point of this system if the answer to a ride request should always be yes? according to some of you. Oh, that would take away CA Authority...
I dont know how many details do we need. I dont have an opinion one way or the other. Never planning on making a 14 hour jumpseat, would be nice if I needed it though.

I dont have a problem with the original post, I am a big enough boy to know there may be more to the story. Rumors are this is not an isolated incident but by all means lets (apostraphe ignored on purpose) not talk about it.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 12:06 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
Well, excu-u-u-u-u-use ME!


I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...

I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.

Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.

I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...






.
Well said.......
4A2B is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 12:29 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
Well, excu-u-u-u-u-use ME!


I don't know if there's something to this, or just an interesting coincidence, but ...

I jumpseat on this flight quite a bit, and I've almost always received a warm "Welcome Aboard!". I've been welcomed when there was IOE and LCA training in progress, when there were line checks going on ... and when there were three of the four seats in the back filled. Only once did I receive a "I've already approved one jumpseater, so I'd appreciate it if you'd explore other options." He didn't deny the jumpseat, but I did indeed explore other options because I didn't care to be "unwelcome" in a metal tube for 14 hours. It was this same guy.

Now, I wish the guy didn't have that attitude, and I'm in favor of anything which can be done to change it in a positive way, but I am absolutely in support of his authority to deny any jumpseater at any time for any or no reason. We fought hard to defend that authority, and I would oppose any action to compromise that authority.

I'm not sure that anything positive can come of raking him over the coals here ...






.
Most of the posts in this thread don't seem to be suggesting taking action to compromise Captain's authority. I also support his authority to say "no". I would oppose any "official" sanction against this captain for that very reason (to include Pro-standards).

So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".

If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 01:08 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Most of the posts in this thread don't seem to be suggesting taking action to compromise Captain's authority. I also support his authority to say "no". I would oppose any "official" sanction against this captain for that very reason (to include Pro-standards).

So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".

If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
Well said.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 01:10 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Unknown Rider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Most of the posts in this thread don't seem to be suggesting taking action to compromise Captain's authority. I also support his authority to say "no". I would oppose any "official" sanction against this captain for that very reason (to include Pro-standards).

So, "raking him over the coals" here may be one of our ONLY options. Perhaps he'll read this and consider a different viewpoint. Perhaps one of his peers will pass on what is posted here or maybe just give him a friendly "get a grip".

If he chooses to stop hosing his fellow pilots, that's still on his authority. The fact that a possible change of heart was the result of public exposure or peer pressure isn't relevant.
Concur. No one is arguing against Captain's Authority. However, Captain's Authority doesn't stop someone for being held accountable for their action when on the ground.
The Captain get's to make the decision, he also has to live with it.
Unknown Rider is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 01:12 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,338
Default

Originally Posted by repoman
What if this capt said no to every pilot jumpseating every flight....would that be ok? After all he is the PIC..........
Yes, that would be perfectly acceptable and within his rights. I'm sure that he'll understand the identical rationale used by other pilots when he is denied the jumpseat on every flight someone else decides the cockpit is too full.

I'm sure he'd be fine with it. I don't see a problem here.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 01:46 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal
Yes, that would be perfectly acceptable and within his rights. I'm sure that he'll understand the identical rationale used by other pilots when he is denied the jumpseat on every flight someone else decides the cockpit is too full.

I'm sure he'd be fine with it. I don't see a problem here.
How are the other guys going to find out who should be denied a jumpseat and who shouldnt? Perhaps 4A2b will act as the clearing house for who is cool and who is not since he doesnt want to discuss it here.
FDXLAG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coach67
Southwest
50
12-12-2014 06:12 PM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
DrPepper
Major
52
07-02-2008 12:59 PM
Piloto Noche
Cargo
46
12-02-2007 10:16 PM
vagabond
Technical
3
09-06-2007 02:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices