Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Brillance of FDA LOA 1 >

FDX - Brillance of FDA LOA 1

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Brillance of FDA LOA 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-2012, 08:15 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Max,

Not an attorney...just a pilot like you. However, if we are already in place, doing the job well, and our pilots are happy, we offer a little more security to the company under the RLA than a strike-prone Euro company.

When you start delving into "if they do that, we would do this..." I get uncomfortable. I don't feel like negotiating or discussing contingencies in public (not that I am privy any more to anything anyway.) What I can say is that in business if I can eliminate the risk of the unknown with a solid known I"m probably going to do so. Mergers, euro-labor laws, etc are all unknowns. Remember the cancelled Paris bid after our "sure thing" RLA waiver failed? I think if FedEx pilots do what FedEx pilots do--that is be be professional, mission oriented, and capable--we'll be successful in both Europe and China.

Good idea to support the interim contract or stupid idea, I"m just sharing where I was on the issue. I wrote a long piece on "leverage" a while back that sort of of sums up my thoughts, and points out where i thought I did okay and a few goofs on the way too. I hated LOA 1, and I thought the last deal offered was "fair". I'm just pointing out a few of the reasons why.

And, of course--I may be wrong.
Albief15 is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 08:20 AM
  #12  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15
Max,

Not an attorney...just a pilot like you. However, if we are already in place, doing the job well, and our pilots are happy, we offer a little more security to the company under the RLA than a strike-prone Euro company.

When you start delving into "if they do that, we would do this..." I get uncomfortable. I don't feel like negotiating or discussing contingencies in public (not that I am privy any more to anything anyway.) What I can say is that in business if I can eliminate the risk of the unknown with a solid known I"m probably going to do so. Mergers, euro-labor laws, etc are all unknowns. Remember the cancelled Paris bid after our "sure thing" RLA waiver failed? I think if FedEx pilots do what FedEx pilots do--that is be be professional, mission oriented, and capable--we'll be successful in both Europe and China.

Good idea to support the interim contract or stupid idea, I"m just sharing where I was on the issue. I wrote a long piece on "leverage" a while back that sort of of sums up my thoughts, and points out where i thought I did okay and a few goofs on the way too. I hated LOA 1, and I thought the last deal offered was "fair". I'm just pointing out a few of the reasons why.

And, of course--I may be wrong.

So why did we give this away so cheap? That is my problem with the latest TA.
MaxKts is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 08:36 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Flightmech
Oh not the 146 pleaseWhoever buys TNT just send them to the scrapyard
Are you kidding after we allow the 146 the company will buy up all the ones in the scrap yard and they will start taking over the IND routes. ALPA will say oops we didnt foresee that.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 02-29-2012 at 08:46 AM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 12:09 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: First Officer
Posts: 40
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Are you kidding after we allow the 146 the company will buy up all the ones in the scrap yard and they will start taking over the IND routes. ALPA will say oops we didnt foresee that.
I heard the union is considering a 5 year fence for regular APC posters before they can asssume a management position.

Last edited by FDX Block 8; 02-29-2012 at 01:44 PM.
FDX Block 8 is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 01:03 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Some of us they gave a lifetime ban.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:52 AM
  #16  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Question

After this comment (from today's Chairman's Message):


"The major concern to FedEx pilots is scope. Specifically, what would a purchase or partial purchase mean to FedEx pilots? Unfortunately, when all is added up it equals grey, it all depends on many factors."



How does our "Industry Leading Scope" and the decision to give the company an FDA so cheap look now?
MaxKts is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 07:58 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: First Officer
Posts: 40
Default

Originally Posted by MaxKts


How does our "Industry Leading Scope" and the decision to give the company an FDA so cheap look now?
I really don't know which Chairman you're referring to. Before we gave the company CGN for a 6% raise BC and DW gave up HKG for nothing.

Maybe you should ask BC the next time you see him. Via LEC 7 message line we all know CB and TH are big fans of BC's work too.

I don't want to confuse anyone with facts but Asia is still short of pilots while Europe has more than they need.
FDX Block 8 is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:54 PM
  #18  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by FDX Block 8
I really don't know which Chairman you're referring to.
That would be our MEC Chairman or are you not on the union email list?

Originally Posted by FDX Block 8
Before we gave the company CGN for a 6% raise
GAVE is the appropriate word. A 6% pay raise offset by the other give backs was a loss for us! But, I'm glad you are happy with only 6%

Originally Posted by FDX Block 8
BC and DW gave up HKG for nothing.

Maybe you should ask BC the next time you see him. Via LEC 7 message line we all know CB and TH are big fans of BC's work too.
You have absolutely no clue who I am if you think I am a fan of BC or would even be in the same room with him. Just call me one of the "Proponents of Hysteria" or a 32%

For the record I voted no in 2006 and every time since then.


Originally Posted by FDX Block 8
I don't want to confuse anyone with facts but Asia is still short of pilots while Europe has more than they need.

Here is a fact for you:

FedEx wants FedEx pilots flying FedEx freight. It doesn't matter how many pilots they have in Europe. The company wants a crewforce that won't go on strike because it is Tuesday!
MaxKts is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 07:40 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
BadgerBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by maxkts
here is a fact for you:

Fedex wants fedex pilots flying fedex freight. It doesn't matter how many pilots they have in europe. The company wants a crewforce that won't go on strike because it is tuesday!


Exactly, even if we can't get it right ourselves, that fact might save us!
BadgerBoy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Opposing View
Cargo
167
03-03-2011 05:39 PM
CloudSailor
Cargo
30
12-27-2010 07:38 PM
Trapav8r
Cargo
16
07-27-2007 06:52 PM
skypine27
Cargo
26
07-20-2007 07:10 AM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices