Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FedEx MEC on wrong Track >

FedEx MEC on wrong Track

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx MEC on wrong Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2012, 11:04 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by HazCan
After reading these threads, I am now pro-abortion...as long as its selectively retroactive.



Glad to see your beliefs are flexible. You now have flyers permission to stay at FDX.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 11:29 AM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
vonFlieger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 35
Default Clever title here...

Originally Posted by Huck
It's amazing - guys sitting at the very peak of the profession, complaining about their representation.

Call up a World guy and ask him if he would pay 2% for a contract like ours. Or a Delta guy or United guy, for that matter.

This fracas is embarrassing, for sure. And I put God, family and country first too. But I can provide alot more for all three with a solid union contract like ours. Comrade.
I think it is ludicrous to say we are at the peak....that is like saying you came in first in a race only you ran. We are top dog because everyone else got screwed in the post 9/11 fall out. Being number one by default, while better than being last, still is not where we should be.

To the question of closed shop. ALPA might not sign off on contract removing that clause; but if ALPA National chooses to not see us as equals, we can always kick them off the property. Not advocating that, but there are always options. Just tired of being a second class citizen.

I am sure I will get blasted by the "all knowing, wiser than me types" because I do not have the required number of posts to be considered in the club. Before you roll in guns hot, I challenge you to go to the Jetflyers page on facebook and do it using your real name and identity. I don't mind having different opinions, if we all had the same opinions that would be no fun, I just hate the elitist attitude and personal attacks that come under the veil of anonymity on here.
vonFlieger is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 12:36 PM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
Good Beer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 97
Default

He just keeps shouting until you get sick of posting...


Originally Posted by md11phlyer
Unreal....
Good Beer is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 12:58 PM
  #64  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by HazCan
After reading these threads, I am now pro-abortion...as long as its selectively retroactive.



And I suppose you will pick the subjects. I can give you some suggestions!
iarapilot is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 05:09 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX
And being unionized did what exactly to prevent any of that?

Thats right, nothing. And neither did any of their PAC money.
Read the book. The earliest example of "unionized" is our forebearers the mail carriers. Many died in bad wx accdients. Management pushed pilots, threatened termination if a guy refused to fly in freezing rain etc, Eventually these initial pilots decided to hang together or hang individually. So they unionized, when the "boss" get in that airlane & fly to x, or your fired they all refused (after seeingmnay of their peers killed, there are many many examples, this is what started ALPA.

Being unionized did not prevent the Bk & its adverse effects, but in the most regulated industry in the US politics matter. The book will detail quite clearly where, how & why it does, and illuminates where ALPA had an effect & didn't.

There is no panacea promised land. Cargo guys are a minority at ALPA, and although "one level of safety" is a mantra, sometimes decisions are made for the good of the majority vs abstention for all in an endeavor that may not be realistic.

The new 117 rules are an example. I personally think the carvbe out is ludicrous, I even wrote my congressman and feciously asked that since we have different fatigue rules, would he sponsor different BAC limit rules. Big ALPA participated in the NPRM sausage making- unfortunately lobbies with much more financial resources than ALPAs enabled the cargo cutout. I do not believe ALPA could then tell the FAA, it's all or none, the NPRM was promulgated.

However, a PAC enables a seat & a voice to back the staffers & support to get a seat in teh NPRM sausage making & access to supporting memebers. To think that the process got as far as it did without active solicitation for support is naive about how washington works.

We'll never win them all, corporations outspend unions >10:1 lobbying, with legal staffs who can prolong the process until they bleed you of resources until you give up.

The most effective resource we can muster is to garner support by legislators that will slisten and support our issues. This will not hapen by osmosis.
olly is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 05:20 PM
  #66  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

I have read the book. Your post makes my point. The union can't prevent bankruptcies and can't prevent furloughs.

I am in the union and believe that we are better off with one than without one right now, but I also believe that our union screwed us on age 60 and we screwed ourselves on the agency shop clause.

That said, I don't believe in giving the union PAC any money to continue to lobby against my core values and degrade my career progression any further. If it makes you feel any better I don't give money to any political candidates, as I don't think any of them are really interested in anything but lining their own pockets. The great thing about this country is it is still free (for now) and you may give to your heart's content to whomever you choose.

The OP could simply delete the solicitation from ALPA PAC as I did, but the ensuing discourse has been illuminating, so I'm glad he brought it up.

Last edited by FXDX; 02-28-2012 at 05:31 PM. Reason: sorry, got my threads mixed up PAC was a different thread
FXDX is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 05:24 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PastV1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 11 Capt
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX
I have read the book. Your post makes my point. The union can't prevent bankruptcies and can't prevent furloughs.

I am in the union and believe that we are better off with one than without one right now, but I also believe that our union screwed us on age 60 and we screwed ourselves on the agency shop clause.

That said, I don't believe in giving the union PAC any money to continue to lobby against my core values and degrade my career progression any further. If it makes you feel any better I don't give money to any political candidates, as I don't think any of them are really interested in anything but lining their own pockets. The great thing about this country is it is still free (for now) and you may give to your heart's content to whomever you choose.

The OP could simply delete the solicitation from ALPA PAC as I did, but the ensuing discourse has been illuminating, so I'm glad he brought it up.

Without Agency shop how many "one item" people would not give any money to support the union?
PastV1 is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 05:25 PM
  #68  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

My guess is fewer than the number that were grandfathered as non members.
FXDX is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 05:27 PM
  #69  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

We had 97% voluntary membership before agency shop and the big screw job. I think we were holding our own. Much stronger message to the company than forced participation in my opinion, and the unity (what a shock!) was much better. Hmmmmmm.
FXDX is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 06:03 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,338
Default

Originally Posted by md11phlyer
A lot of 'first airline job' syndrome in this thread.

If you don't like being a contract laborer in an organized labor union I suggest you go back to your government job. A lot of us feel proud and privelaged to make this our career and consider the union as a representative body that functions only as well as our level of engagement, not as an 'investment.'

If your politics are really more important to you than your career, excuse me, your post-military-for-cash-hobby, then I suggest you take up a new hobby in line with your beliefs. In the mean time, you're in a labor union. You don't get what you pay for, you get what you contribute.
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Actually God, family, and country come before my career. But you comrade can prioritize anyway you want. Because the founders of this country (and amazingly a lot of the founders of the US labor movement) believed in liberty and the right to work were you want not where some self righteous schmuck tried to tell you to.

PS how is the multiple airline syndrome mentality working out in the Pax service?
It scares me when I find LAG to be in agreement with my thoughts. I agree with this 100%. Quite frankly, I would be better off financially if I didn't lose a large portion of an inheritance due to confiscatory taxes, and feel the need to put my childred in private school. If I could trade that money (already gone) and never had another pay raise......I'd be better off by a long shot. Just my personal situation.

I find it laughable, when someone derides me because this is my "first airline". (With all due respect to some of my best friends with four airline uniforms in their closets). We might be smarter than you think. Maybe we did due diligence and turned down other offers (Fact). Maybe we were a little bit lucky (Fact). But honestly, its a little sanctimonious to come here and tell us we are unable to analyze an employment situation because we had the temerity to make a good choice the first time.

It's like a guy with multiple ex-wives telling a guy in a long-term successful marriage that he knows the key to a good relationship. You can tell me what you did wrong....but don't tell me I'm not smart enough to know the score. Getting kicked in the teeth multiple times may teach you what you did wrong each time, but doesn't make you a good fighter.

I hope to be one of those naive "first airline pilots" for another 12 years. I'm not going to tease you about your spelling, because you might be a first time privilege speller!

I was a military pilot....for 12 years.....I am, and have been for another 12 years a civilian pilot. This is my career....and by the way.....you don't get what you contribute or pay for from the union. You get what the union negotiates. Supporting the union, either by sweat, dollars, or both is a business investment. I'm not dull enough to get enjoyment out of it.....it's business.......and a career....my hobbies are a lot more fun

Last edited by Laughing_Jakal; 02-28-2012 at 06:39 PM.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
92
10-19-2010 08:02 PM
cub pilot
Cargo
72
05-27-2006 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices