Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FedEx MEC on wrong Track >

FedEx MEC on wrong Track

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx MEC on wrong Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2012, 06:23 PM
  #11  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal
Second!!!!!
3rd through infinity.......do it Albie.
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 06:42 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Default

Steam, you are right on with all of it .................. Ditto. I don't get the feeling that ALPA has been the answer for the cargo guys and gals, they seem to be more about themselves and the passenger folks. We are paying THE MOST $$$ of anyone out there right now and I am sure they are happy with that one .................. I do not intend to denigrate any one person who has given limitless hours and unselfish talent towards trying help our own.
My problem is with ALPA in itself, I see a lot of room for improvement on the Cargo side and while they are at it, keep all the lip service to themselves. We need performance here not excuses. The rank and file here needs more bang for the buck ................ Are we getting it ? I am not yet convinced.
tennesseeflyboy is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 06:59 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Might I suggest constitution changes where we directly elect block reps not LEC reps and more importantly directly elect MEC officers. Less oportunity for leadership via back room deal rumors. Could stagger MEC officer elections so the membership can provide regular guidance to the politbureau.

What better time then right now as we have 3 or 4 years to wait for the company to us make a real offer.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 02-27-2012 at 07:10 PM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 07:21 PM
  #14  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Might I suggest constitution changes where we directly elect block reps not LEC reps and more importantly directly elect MEC officers. Less oportunity for leadership via back room deal rumors. Could stagger MEC officer elections so the membership can provide regular guidance to the politbureau.

What better time then right now as we have 3 or 4 years to wait for the company to make a real offer.
I like it.......I like it alot. Lets go with this........
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 07:32 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gderek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 285
Default

Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
3rd through infinity.......do it Albie.

Albie that would be awesome, we draft you.

As for Steam, you are right about ALPA national but don't fall victim to what all of the troublemakers are trying to do. In fact, I'm surprised that the Negotiating guys resigned. I'd stay and fight, I guess they felt too compromised.
gderek is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 07:35 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

I should add that maybe MEC officers would be better able to defend themselves against charges of block hour abuse by all parties if they didnt owe the block reps their loyalty and vice versa.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 07:54 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
3rd through infinity.......do it Albie.
You guys are quite flattering...I feel like Miss Piggy getting complimented. But, like Miss Piggy, I"m still at heart a fat chick with quite a few flaws...and detractors.

Here's the deal: The bros don't' elect the MEC officers, the MEC reps do. I'm pretty darn sure a few of those fine folks would NEVER vote for me. Whomever gets the nod, however, will have the job of making sure we can get everyone playing (somewhat) peacefully and get moving back in the right direction. I personally was encouraged by the progress being made by all the committees when I left, and I'd don't like this kind of destructive behavior. I will simply say that in my 3 years as an MEC member, I never compromised executive session material (was accused by DW once but it was refuted) and I never trash talked another rep or committee person. We gotta get back to learning to walk before we can run towards success.

If it were me, I'd let the sharp guys you elect make the best call on that one. What I would do, however, is do everything I could to make sure that henceforth and forevermore we don't' have 20% turnout in any elections, but push guys to make a stand and vote. It was also easy for me to pound the table when my block had the highest survey response, participation, etc. I felt like when I spoke I really did have about 500 guys (and another 1000 from the other blocks) behind me. Engagement=success. Passive=other people decide your fate. No VC...Martin, Manning, Mahoney...is gonna "fix" the MEC or solve all your problems. It takes a unified group, and that is why this undercutting to me is so frustrating.

What's the fix? Dunno yet, but I still have faith in the line pilot and the ability of most of us to see through the fog and dust and find the truth. I'm irritated, but I still feel like we have made good progress and will continue to do so.
Albief15 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 08:01 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by tennesseeflyboy
I don't get the feeling that ALPA has been the answer for the cargo guys and gals, they seem to be more about themselves and the passenger folks.
My problem is with ALPA in itself, I see a lot of room for improvement on the Cargo side and while they are at it, keep all the lip service to themselves. We need performance here not excuses. The rank and file here needs more bang for the buck ................ Are we getting it ? I am not yet convinced.
Agree here with Davey Crocket. ALPA is very expensive. No excuse for the passenger guys throwing the cargo guys under the bus, especially considering the amount of dough we cough up. ALPA should have said all or nothing in its response to the new duty time regs.
PicklePausePull is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 08:05 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by steamgauge

My MEC needs to remember we are their number one priority--with ALPA, SS’s quest for ALPA president, the AFL/CIO’s choice for president and other issues on the distant second and “if time permits” list!
IMO,
Steamgauge
Agree. It is offensive to professional pilots, most who have served in the military and support republican ideals, to have an affiliation with the AFL-CIO, which endorses left wing politicians, and is known for its historical ties with organized crime.
The MEC should be focussing on FEDEX issues. That is what we are paying for. I don't give a hoot about the AFL-CIO, Democrat party politics, or passenger carriers (because they obviously don't give a hoot about us in the cargo community). I fly cargo. Represent me in the job I do!
PicklePausePull is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 08:49 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by PicklePausePull
Agree. It is offensive to professional pilots, most who have served in the military and support republican ideals, to have an affiliation with the AFL-CIO, which endorses left wing politicians, and is known for its historical ties with organized crime.
The MEC should be focussing on FEDEX issues. That is what we are paying for. I don't give a hoot about the AFL-CIO, Democrat party politics, or passenger carriers (because they obviously don't give a hoot about us in the cargo community). I fly cargo. Represent me in the job I do!
As a professional airline pilot, I'd highly recommend that you read "Flying the Line Part II".

As a former military pilot, ensconced in a sheltered world, I naively believed in most so called egalitarian "republican ideals", that were the defacto "culture" in the military, existed as well in big business.

I was wrong. Mostly just ignorant of the management-labor/owner of capital vs owners of labor history in our good country. (because we never had to deal with it in the military). After you do some bonafide research of the factual history of our industry you may draw your own conclusions.

After sitting in the BK courtroom & watching the BK of UAL proceedings, I took an active interest in understanding this. I was apalled at the actions presented in the book, "Flying the Line II", and even did independent research to validate & verify. Reading further labor/management hsitory of our railroads (where do you think the railway labor act comes from??) you'll see the airlines management just copied what the railroads did to labor earlier in US history.

The only thing that has changed is that labor has not learned what is being foist upon them. Both groups tend to overreach, and at times each gets hurt. However, in the long run, the working man who is neither sufficiently educated, nor with the organizational, historical or financial clout is the one disadvantaged. That is the sole reason for the affiliation that you find troubling.

I'm quite sure, if you are intellectually honest, and put your past bias aside while you learn about our profession, you will understand. You might not like it, you'll find out some of our countries' leaders (gov & industry) took action that you might never think they would-but they did.

For me it took the event of a bankruptcy, and loss of a pension & ESOP stock to wake up and "smell the coffe" - to get smart on the real playing field we're on. Most guys here at FDX have not been thru such a traumatic experience, and as you've heard, comfort leads to complacency and expectation bias- thus no motivation to "learn" the new environment of just being labor for a big business. i.e we've had it relatively ok at FDX, so by & large there hasn't been an impetus for the average line guy to delve into the subject, so he lives with his learned experience (military- cuz that's what we knew).
olly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
92
10-19-2010 08:02 PM
cub pilot
Cargo
72
05-27-2006 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices