Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX defers 11 Boeing 777F, orders 767 >

FDX defers 11 Boeing 777F, orders 767

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX defers 11 Boeing 777F, orders 767

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2011, 07:17 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 178
Default

I wonder just how junior the current crop of 757 dudes are going to get pushed when the 767 wanna be's pile on.
Lippy is offline  
Old 12-17-2011, 07:29 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
Not to mention, my B757: B767 type, earned in a sim with the Fedex ISS glass displays, allows me to operate older B757s with conventional displays.
...and vice versa. Initial FedEx training was done in "classic" cockpits. No IS&S cockpit sims were available.
Doogs is offline  
Old 12-17-2011, 07:31 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheBaron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 608
Default

Hopefully no one bids 767 until we have a pay rate agreed to (wide-body.)
Awhh...who am I kidding..
TheBaron is offline  
Old 12-17-2011, 07:49 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron
Hopefully no one bids 767 until we have a pay rate agreed to

That's easy. Let's just give them the 777 pay rate.
Gunter is offline  
Old 12-17-2011, 08:01 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron
Hopefully no one bids 767 until we have a pay rate agreed to (wide-body.)
Didn't the 757 guys already bid it via the common type? The company will just add the 767 to the fleet and after some differences training, the 757 guys will fly 'em. An extra day during recurrent along with some CBT and those guys will be full up 767 pilots - no bid required.

The pay needs to be WB, no doubt, but I seriously doubt we'll see a 767 specific bid that could be refused (yah... right) to force the issue.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 05:08 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
That's easy. Let's just give them the 777 pay rate.

Well ... since the 777 didn't qualify for A380 pay (despite DW & BC advising us otherwise!*?), maybe we can agrue the 767 should get it. After all, it's in the contract. Why would it be there if NOBODY actually gets that rate (does management get it)?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 05:46 AM
  #57  
trip trading freak
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: MD-11
Posts: 673
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Didn't the 757 guys already bid it via the common type? The company will just add the 767 to the fleet and after some differences training, the 757 guys will fly 'em. An extra day during recurrent along with some CBT and those guys will be full up 767 pilots - no bid required.

The pay needs to be WB, no doubt, but I seriously doubt we'll see a 767 specific bid that could be refused (yah... right) to force the issue.
Actually, the 757 guys specifically bid the 757 as referenced on the bid and the contract under pay rates. Regardless that it is a same type rating, it is a new aircraft in service (as per the contract) and has to be dealt with as such. Now, If our guys start flying them like the 777 before pay rates are established, then it will be simple if arbitrated. Once again, we are our own worst enemy. Stay the line. It is a wide body airplane replacing a wide body airplane!
Pakagecheck is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 10:25 AM
  #58  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by Pakagecheck
Actually, the 757 guys specifically bid the 757 as referenced on the bid and the contract under pay rates. Regardless that it is a same type rating, it is a new aircraft in service (as per the contract) and has to be dealt with as such. Now, If our guys start flying them like the 777 before pay rates are established, then it will be simple if arbitrated. Once again, we are our own worst enemy. Stay the line. It is a wide body airplane replacing a wide body airplane!

Very good advice.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 11:00 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Pakagecheck
Actually, the 757 guys specifically bid the 757 as referenced on the bid and the contract under pay rates. Regardless that it is a same type rating, it is a new aircraft in service (as per the contract) and has to be dealt with as such.
You mean like when the MD-10 started showing up?

If you were here you will recall there were MD-11 Pilots and DC-10 Pilots.

Nobody Bid the MD10, it just showed up and was in the MD-11 Bidpack because it is a common type.

Lets not get too wrapped around the axle.

Most likely the 767 will simply be incorporated into the existing 757 Bid pack as was the MD10 and as is the A310 is in the A300 bidpack. I would imagine that in the next year or two all 757 pilots will get differences training and maybe 1 or 2 sims in a 767 and voila we will instantly have 300 plus 0r minus, new 767 qualified pilots with no bid required.

Section 26K covers a new aircraft acquisition.
There is a Contractual requirement to go to arbitration if the Union and MGT cannot agree on a pay rate before it enters service. What are the odds that will happen? No predictions on how that will turn out, but the requirement is there.

Should the 767 pay widebody rates? In my opinion it certainly should. Funny thing is Management never asks my opinion.

No use bickering about it, its covered in the contract, good bad indifferent.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 04:13 PM
  #60  
trip trading freak
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: MD-11
Posts: 673
Default

Yes, I was here when the MD10 started showing up. The difference is that the MD10 is a wide body aircraft that got incorporated into a wide body bid pack and pay scale. Why would we argue that? Same with the 310. The 767 is a wide body aircraft that most likely will be incorporated into a narrow body bid pack. Big difference.

You are correct and as I referenced it is covered in the contract. However, If it goes to arbitration our actions will definitely be taken into account.

You are also correct in that we don't need to get wrapped around the axle. I don't get the impression that anyone is yet. We do however need to get educated on the possibllites and what ramifications our individual actions can have.
Pakagecheck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
0
12-30-2005 07:03 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices