Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Cargo Slump And The 747-8 >

Cargo Slump And The 747-8

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Cargo Slump And The 747-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2011, 01:59 PM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default Cargo Slump And The 747-8

There is a cargo slump?? Certainly not evident at NRT yesterday where there seemed to be more FedEx planes than passenger ones!

Cargo slump threatens more pain for Boeing 747-8 | Reuters
vagabond is offline  
Old 10-28-2011, 04:02 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,539
Default

Maybe if FedEx was buying 747-8s that would be good for the 747-8.
TallFlyer is offline  
Old 10-28-2011, 11:00 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Sierra ramp in Amsterdam was nearly full of cargo planes yesterday.....
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 12:15 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

ANA's cargo numbers are way high, up to the point that they have been using passenger 777's on freighter flights (just using the lower deck) because they don't have enough freighters to cover the demand, I don't know what these people are talking about
The Dominican is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 09:31 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 1
Default

Dominican, I assume you fly for AIr JApan, do you like the job? and which contract company do you use, I was thinking of Applying?
Thanks
fr8ape is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 07:16 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SVTCobra's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: B747-400 CA
Posts: 373
Default

I think the operators that ordered the -800 are getting cold feet given the cost and the extremely small difference in payload (4-6 more pallets) vs the -400. The -800 is suppose to burn 16% less fuel. I don't see an advantage for the -800 unless you pay cash for it.

Last edited by SVTCobra; 10-29-2011 at 07:32 PM.
SVTCobra is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 08:24 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Green Giant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Airbus
Posts: 630
Default

Boeing dropped the last two digits. So it is now only the B747-8. The -8 does have a greater range with a full load verses the -400.

With the -400's being harder to find, the -8 might be attractive considering that they have a common type with the -400.
Green Giant is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 04:13 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

There's a great article in the 10/31 issue of Time about the China bubble economy.... Very relevant to this discussion.
Grumble is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 06:51 PM
  #9  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
There's a great article in the 10/31 issue of Time about the China bubble economy.... Very relevant to this discussion.
Here's a piece done on 10/17.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2096345-1,00.html


Ally
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 09:46 PM
  #10  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Hawker 800
Posts: 1
Default

This isn't as recent, but its a great video showing China's housing boom.
China's Hypergrowth Fueled By Building Giant Cities No One Lives In - The Consumerist
thebends is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices