Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS -Accepting non-union mgmt. positions >

UPS -Accepting non-union mgmt. positions

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS -Accepting non-union mgmt. positions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2011, 08:42 AM
  #51  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,754
Default

Originally Posted by Alfaro120
Outside the awkwardness and backwardness of all this is there any practical problems with the uniqueness of this management model (i.e people getting written up, fired or taken advantage of unnecessarily).
I would say 95% of the line pilots have a letter in their file for something.
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 08:49 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheyDogFlies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Kickin it "C"old School in AK
Posts: 283
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I would say 95% of the line pilots have a letter in their file for something.
IE refusing to operate an aircraft against the FARs?
CheyDogFlies is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 08:59 AM
  #53  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by CheyDogFlies
IE refusing to operate an aircraft against the FARs?
I'm willing to go on a limb and say more likely refusing to wipe their arse with the CBA.. This country is so anti-union that I've found that the general culture now-a-days at all airlines (and this is largely the fault of weak pilots who are afraid to say no) is to "Fly it and grieve it" .. then 90% of the time, the grievance has 0 benefit to the poor sap having to fly it... and the company gets the benefit of getting what they want..

We have weak labor laws here, and the current congress would love to weaken them even further... it's time to send BOTH parties a message that unions aren't going anywhere.. not as long as managements like UAL, AMR, and UPS continue to play their kind of games..
CE750 is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 09:19 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Alfaro120
..... is there any practical problems with the uniqueness of this management model (i.e people getting written up, fired or taken advantage of unnecessarily).
Alfaro,
In a nutshell, we have some really exceptional Flight Qualified managers and supervisors.
However, UPS management model has little faith in any union "hourly" employees. ATL and airline non flight qualified management treat some of the more respected flight managers little better.
Labor management or Maintenenance is in charge, not the Flight Managers/Supervisors. It is all cost, management, and any leadership from any pilot is often ignored.

Result: UPS Flight Qualified supervisors and even a few of the managers can rarely make a meaningful change that actually enhances the business and our profitability. There input is rarely acted upon with any consistency. Bad for business, our shareholders, our customers and our pilot group. Management not leadership.

The management model is stovepiped and all pilots ("hourly" or supervisor) are not really valued by the groundside handlers throughout the airline. Add to this that UPS is hiring non union pilots while leaving present pilot employees on the street. Yes, this stilts the relationship of the 'airline within an airline'
We live with these contradictions daily. It is like no other in the industry.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 11:56 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Alfaro120
no, i don't know anyone there and all I have is RJ PIC time.
You do know that Pinnacle is almost like a farm club for us. Purple likes RJ pilots.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 02:25 PM
  #56  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by CE750
I've found that the general culture now-a-days at all airlines (and this is largely the fault of weak pilots who are afraid to say no) is to "Fly it and grieve it" .. then 90% of the time, the grievance has 0 benefit to the poor sap having to fly it... and the company gets the benefit of getting what they want..
It's a bunch of bs!
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 05:02 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
To Stay or Go's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
You do know that Pinnacle is almost like a farm club for us. Purple likes RJ pilots.
Best prep for an MD-11 is the RJ.
To Stay or Go is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 05:08 PM
  #58  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Best prep for an MD-11 is the RJ.
having flown both, I find some truth in that statement.. "some"

Fast ref speeds .... check
glass cockpit .... check
FMS layout/features .... no
rotation rate ..... no
automation ..... no


putting aside the obvious (717), for smaller planes, I'd argue the Airbus 320 has far more in common with an MD11 than an RJ.. down to the large/tall cockpit which lends to a much bigger airplane feel.

It's almost as if the engineers at Airbus stole 90% of the systems and avionics implementation from Douglas.
CE750 is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 06:08 PM
  #59  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 540
Default

Originally Posted by CE750

It's almost as if the engineers at Airbus stole 90% of the systems and avionics implementation from Douglas.
I flew the A319/320 at UAL and the word they spread was MD had laid off quite a few engineers at the time Airbus was designing the A320 series. Hence the MD similarities. Engineers are just like the rest of us, don't want to reinvent the wheel if they don't have to.
bifff15 is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 07:38 PM
  #60  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by bifff15
I flew the A319/320 at UAL and the word they spread was MD had laid off quite a few engineers at the time Airbus was designing the A320 series. Hence the MD similarities. Engineers are just like the rest of us, don't want to reinvent the wheel if they don't have to.
that makes perfect sense...thx
CE750 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blue Collar Man
Cargo
221
03-29-2011 09:31 AM
Jack Bauer
Union Talk
16
12-15-2007 12:17 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-11-2005 08:59 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM
captain_drew
Cargo
6
05-24-2005 08:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices