Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX TA-Issues surrounding grievance 10-02 >

FDX TA-Issues surrounding grievance 10-02

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX TA-Issues surrounding grievance 10-02

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2011, 11:20 PM
  #11  
Nice lookin' tree, there!
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Tool-Box, old man
Posts: 2,204
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX
Oh, this was a 777 Captain?

Next.
The senior Captain of the two should get A380 pay
fbh
frozenboxhauler is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 12:12 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

When FedEx first started flying double crews KIX-MEM the Captain that had FDX18 on his trip was PIC, the Captain with FDX7018 was the Relief Captain. On one of these trips the PIC was junior. When the crew was alerted they were informed that there would be a jumpseater. Actually a FAA Maint. Inspector. The senior Captain had a real problem with this. There was not enough room, the cockpit was too crowded blah, blah. We had another flight that also went to MEM via ANC a few hours later. The inspector agreed to take the later flight. All was fine until the inspector's boss found out about it. The two Captains were called in to explain why the FAA inspector was bumped. The senior guy, the relief Captain, the only guy that had a problem with the 5th guy in the cockpit said "Hey, I was not PIC". The junior Captain, the PIC, had his ATP suspended for two weeks as punishment for bumping a FAA inspector. It was after that event that the most senior Captain was PIC. The senior Captain system then caused problems when they started building trips that were D/H MEM-CDG, operate CDG-Subic, D/H Subic-KIX, operate KIX-MEM. Some had a real problem with this system.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 03:37 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

I, for one had a big problem with that lousy system, because in virtually every case, if the senior captain had wanted the original trip pairing, all he (or she) had to do was bid it. That way, they would have been the senior captain on the trip, and a junior captain would have gotten the relief captain pairing. I disliked the idea that a guy could be First-Classing all over the world, just to join another crew in mid-pairing, and take over the PIC duties, for a leg or two, then disappear once again, to deadhead somewhere else, to again take over a flight pairing.

It happened to me in February, 2003, when FedEx started flying into Kuwait in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. They were asking for volunteers to do that flying, and so I did. The trip went MEM - DOV- FRA-OKBK (Kuwait International), then on to DXB (Dubai Int'l), then back to CDG and finally back to MEM. When we showed for the FRA - OKBK - DXB leg, we met another captain in ops, who informed us that he was going to be the PIC. Besides really ruining the cockpit harmony we had established, this guy sat in the seat the entire time, and flew a lousy airplane. We had to go around at Kuwait, because he had gotten too close to a C-130 on final, then he demanded a right turnout, instead of the left turnout that tower had assigned, because he "knew" that Iraqi was "over there to the left somewhere". As well, he didn't allow the F/O to fly the second leg, as he took that one too. Then after clearing customs in Dubai, he immediately left the terminal, found our hotel van and told the driver to depart for the hotel. By the time the F/O and I got outside, the van was gone and we had to take a cab. Needless to say, that put a rather bad taste in my mouth for the remainder of the time I flew as a Captain.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 05:12 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by thebigdawg
There is no such thing as a PIC pairing.
There will be if this TA passes, like others have said the Block 5 rep was wrong on this subject in his letter. Even today (pre-TA) the FOM does have this screwed up procedure in place for double augmented flight. This TA settlement and the wording change in 22.B.2 of the CBA finally put this bad policy to bed.

Seniority applies in every case listed in 22.B.2, but should have never been allowed to be utilized twice with respect to bidding lines, first pick the trip you want and then use your seniority to bump a CA flying his butt off on a full crew pairing and disrupt the entire apple cart.

What's next for the seniority system, parking and bumping spots in democrat by seniority? Bid what you want to fly (or not if you want a monster D/H trip).
4A2B is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 05:38 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cargo Pirate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Left to right
Posts: 119
Default

The senior captain should be PIC. Period. It doesn't matter if he's on m/u, sub, reserve, etc... It doesn't matter if he's a bad captain. That is how seniority works. I don't care if you bid that line!
Cargo Pirate is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 05:41 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Check 6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 777
Posts: 866
Default

Originally Posted by Cargo Pirate
The senior captain should be PIC. Period. It doesn't matter if he's on m/u, sub, reserve, etc... It doesn't matter if he's a bad captain. That is how seniority works. I don't care if you bid that line!

BS... Bid a flying line or bid the easy DH's that's your choice and your seniority rights... Period. Once the flying starts you are SOL..so sit back..relax and don't burn the dinner...
Check 6 is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 05:50 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

Maybe the senior capt should be able to just take a trip from the junior capt line if he wants it.

I think that the senior capt used his seniority to bid the rf2 line, and he should be happy with it.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 06:26 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Default

Concur.

CAVU/very senior Captain
CAVU is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 06:38 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
niteFly84's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 123
Default

I agree also.. you want ff miles bid the RF2 pairing and sit back and watch..
ALso a very senior capt on 777..
niteFly84 is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 06:46 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 124
Default

Originally Posted by Cargo Pirate
The senior captain should be PIC. Period. It doesn't matter if he's on m/u, sub, reserve, etc... It doesn't matter if he's a bad captain. That is how seniority works. I don't care if you bid that line!
Seniority establishes bidding order. It does not establish succession to the Royal line, Rank, or any other delusions of grandeur that some one may have. Bid what you can hold, then deal with it. We don't need to go by date of hire, date of birth, d1(k length or any other B.S. "This is not the military, General. I mean Captain."
Fly FDX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
boxhauler
Cargo
5
03-19-2008 08:39 PM
skypine27
Cargo
26
07-20-2007 07:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices