Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx Retirement Data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2010, 06:40 PM
  #51  
On Reserve
 
ForestGump's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 24
Default

Fresh Hot Pizza has a point. That's why it's called a negotiation. Everything is on the table if the company and the union decide to discuss it. The end result is always a compromise between competing interests. My short history with the company (10 years) has taught me that most negotiations favor the top of the seniority list. If the senior guys aren't worried about penalties for retiring before age 60, then it won't be hard to give up. By the way, many on the top of the seniority list are well past the 60 yr benchmark....what's a few more years.
ForestGump is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 08:36 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,338
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus
LJ, My bad. For some reason I thought you meant that we are not vested. Disregard....
No worries.......nuance is not a strong point of message boards....we are all on the same team.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 12:17 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Default

OK did some quick retirement calculations in Quicken, all in today's dollars.

Assuming one wanted to retire with $100K annual income, worked at FedEx for 25 years, started at age 40, lived to be 85, 3% inflation and 8% return; your required annual contribution would be $44,578.

Now assume an average income over your 25 year career of $200K; to achieve the $100K would require a 22% B-fund contribution, including our current contribution this becomes 29%.

Personally I don't think that is all that unreasonable to ask for as a replacement for the A plan.
MD10PLT is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 05:41 AM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 77
Default

If our MEC and negotiating team come back with a contract with a change in the retirement age because of the senior ones, there will be heck to pay. I will picket in front of the MEC office and MEC Chairman's house with a bullhorn even if I am by myself, every day I have off. I do not believe it will happen but if they are willing to trade a few dollars for the "GIFTED ONES", then the unity in this place will blow up. I have more faith in our MEC to do what is right for all, not just the few at the tip of the pyramid.
HankHill is offline  
Old 12-19-2010, 11:03 AM
  #55  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by MD10PLT
OK did some quick retirement calculations in Quicken, all in today's dollars.

Assuming one wanted to retire with $100K annual income, worked at FedEx for 25 years, started at age 40, lived to be 85, 3% inflation and 8% return; your required annual contribution would be $44,578.

Now assume an average income over your 25 year career of $200K; to achieve the $100K would require a 22% B-fund contribution, including our current contribution this becomes 29%.

Personally I don't think that is all that unreasonable to ask for as a replacement for the A plan.
Starting at yr 1 of 25, how much would it be starting at year 17 of 25?
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 12-19-2010, 12:11 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by MD10PLT
OK did some quick retirement calculations in Quicken, all in today's dollars.

Assuming one wanted to retire with $100K annual income, worked at FedEx for 25 years, started at age 40, lived to be 85, 3% inflation and 8% return; your required annual contribution would be $44,578.

Now assume an average income over your 25 year career of $200K; to achieve the $100K would require a 22% B-fund contribution, including our current contribution this becomes 29%.

Personally I don't think that is all that unreasonable to ask for as a replacement for the A plan.
That all sounds great but under the IRS 415 C limits for DC plans (B-Funds,401K's and Sick buy back are inclusive) is Capped $49,000.

I believe the IRS Qualified plan limit for 2010 is $240,000 meaning that is what your B Plan percentage Cap is.

Once you hit Captain rates you bump up against these annual caps.
You would also lose the ability of maxing out a 401K (tax break) or in most cases
lose payment while in LTD status (on LTD no deposits to your 401K or B Fund).

With the A fund a Pilot still gets longevity credit towards years of service.
Ask some of our guys who had to medically stop flying but have not yet "retired".
You do not want to lose this option should you need it as 1 out of 4 statisically will.

We have a very good balanced retirement plan. Why even talk of giving up our A plan? This was a deal breaker before (last contract) and was one of the prime reason this group unionized in 1993. OBRA 93's $ 75,000 cap on Pensions.

Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 12-19-2010 at 05:57 PM.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 12-19-2010, 12:53 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r

We have a very good balanced retirement plan. Why even talk of giving up our A plan? This was a deal breaker before (last contract) and was one of the prime reason this group unionized in 1993.

Best point yet ... hear, hear!

Mark

Last edited by MaydayMark; 12-19-2010 at 04:14 PM. Reason: spelling police
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 12-19-2010, 02:46 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
boxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r

We have a very good balanced retirement plan. Why even talk of giving up our A plan?
Exactly! Balance, multi-legged stool, however you want to look at it the A plan is a valuable part of our retirement plan. I wont vote for anything that hints at eliminating it.
boxhauler is offline  
Old 12-19-2010, 04:49 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by boxhauler
Exactly! Balance, multi-legged stool, however you want to look at it the A plan is a valuable part of our retirement plan. I wont vote for anything that hints at eliminating it.
Same here. It wasn't so long ago that most saw their 401Ks and investments decimated. I'd rather not have to rely on smart investing or good timing alone.
Deuce130 is offline  
Old 12-19-2010, 05:29 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

The one change that you Will probably see with the next contract is a raise in the max retirement cap, currently 260K. By raising the cap to say 300K, there is a bunch of pilots who previously thought that they had made their high five, that find out that they need 5 more years of high five in order to max out their retirement. Instant extra manning, and less payout of retirement to a bunch of guys who have worked themselves to death for their high five, twice.
The Walrus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 12:25 PM
Browntail
Cargo
8
08-01-2008 05:52 PM
bifff15
Cargo
12
06-03-2008 10:06 AM
Lambo
Cargo
5
07-12-2007 04:55 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-05-2005 04:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices