Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Should you check VIPS? >

Should you check VIPS?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Should you check VIPS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2006, 05:40 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Capt Drew...

As a guy who feels like a newbie even after almost 5 years here, I always enjoy your perspective. Doesn't mean I'll always 100% agree, but dudes like you A) helped build the company that feeds my family and B) entertain me on trips when I hear some of the stories of the crazy stuff that happened here before...

Bitme is right--I don't want you wigged out and ruining your retirement. Your insights, however...I always welcome.

Cheers...
Albief15 is offline  
Old 08-11-2006, 08:24 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: M77C
Posts: 92
Default Trip Revisions

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
Just a question, but if you have already logged onto vips and read Jack's FCIF, are you now obligated to show 2 hours prior? It doesn't affect me personally, but I am just wondering about the company possibly taking hostages for "disobeying the boss" so to speak. What is everyone's opinion on that, because it seems that the union has even given kudos to Jack for getting the word out to everyone so quickly.
Until you've been personally notified by either CRS or VIPS, you're not responsible for any changes to a scheduled trip.

FC
FDXCapt is offline  
Old 08-11-2006, 09:06 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain_drew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: FredEx Captain-Retired
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15
Bitme is right--I don't want you wigged out and ruining your retirement. Your insights, however...I always welcome.

Cheers...
Cheers your own self. I will 'wig out' when gas gets too damn expensive to top off the Harley . .and not until then . . I just know that y'all are going to be retired too. .some day . .and you need to start taking the long view about what you are worth . .and what you have to do (collectively) to get there.
captain_drew is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:11 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A300 Captain
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
it seems that the union has even given kudos to Jack for getting the word out to everyone so quickly.
I came unglued when that message line came out. I have to hope it was just a misguided ill conceived missive that just didn't get caught, but if you too feel your Union should have taken a harder stance you need to let you rep and the MEC know. [email protected]
Bitme is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:42 AM
  #15  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver

Just a question, but if you have already logged onto vips and read Jack's FCIF, are you now obligated to show 2 hours prior?
Notification is defined in The Agreement.


An FCIF from the system chief pilot is NOT one of the methods.



.
TonyC is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:55 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A300 Captain
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by captain_drew
NOT TO MENTION . .I kept the original issue spouse.
Bravo, you're one of the few who's broken the code. Drew I flew with a guy years ago divorced 2 or 3 times and barely taking home a dime; I asked him what failed in the first marriage. He said his wife wanted a maid to clean their house and things went downhill from there. I asked him that now that he had two alimonies how much a maid would have cost him

One of my friends has a real outspoken wife who has a few wines once in a while and loves to joke that she'll suck his d..k til she dies as long as he pops for the maid I know you shouldn't have to pay for it, but everybody pays somehow. I'm very lucky with mein frau, but things would have to get really bad before I'd ever head into D court, especially in TN.
Bitme is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 06:07 AM
  #17  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver

... Jack's FCIF ... What is everyone's opinion on that, because it seems that the union has even given kudos to Jack for getting the word out to everyone so quickly.

Originally Posted by Bitme

I came unglued when that message line came out. I have to hope it was just a misguided ill conceived missive that just didn't get caught, but if you too feel your Union should have taken a harder stance you need to let you rep and the MEC know. [email protected]

I see two issues here. The first is early show times. Asking pilots to show an hour before their scheduled showtimes is unacceptable. If they want us here early, they need to revise the pairings to reflect that. Revising the pairing may, in some cases, impact pay calculations and result in additional monetary compensation.

In that regard, I join the union in praising management for stepping up to the plate and doing the right thing. Rather than leaving the pairings as published and begging us to make the adjustments out of our own free time, they have sucked up a penny or two and put it on paper.


Under different circumstances, I would be more than happy to go above and beyond the call of duty and check my schedule ahead of time to see if there was anything I could do to make sure everything continues to run smoothly for the Company.

Of course, these are NOT different circumstances. These are the circumstances that have been forced by waiting now 803 days after the amendable date of our contract. In THESE circumstances, I'm not inclined to exert even a mere tenth of a percent over 100% effort.


Now, the second issue is that of Notification. Jack seems to think his FCIF is sufficient. The Collective Bargaining Agreement that would be examined in court says differently. I don't believe the Union's message line addresses that aspect of the FCIF.

However, I think the Union must be very careful in how it publicly addresses such issues. For the Union to suggest that we collectively refuse to access VIPS or answer the phone calls from CRS might be construed as an illegal job action, a variation from the normal mode of operation. While we can each choose personally to act in that way, it would not be proper for the Union to encourage the membership as a whole to do anything out of the normal, day-to-day routine.


Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly endorse your idea to let your Reps know how you feel!





.
TonyC is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 01:46 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownGirls YUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by Bitme
Bravo, you're one of the few who's broken the code.
Close, but the one who has no "original issue" wife and only has to pay for the maid is the one who truly has broken the code!
BrownGirls YUM is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 02:23 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain_drew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: FredEx Captain-Retired
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by BrownGirls YUM
Close, but the one who has no "original issue" wife and only has to pay for the maid is the one who truly has broken the code!
I don't THINK so!

That's a pretty sorry, lonely and unhappy SOB!
captain_drew is offline  
Old 09-29-2006, 07:44 PM
  #20  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

Depends on how well you pay the maid.
FXDX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
texas_pilot
Part 135
3
07-08-2006 05:42 PM
socal163
Major
7
02-02-2006 02:40 PM
FrieghtDispatcher
Cargo
1
11-03-2005 12:32 PM
HSLD
JetBlue
6
09-09-2005 09:53 PM
WatchThis!
Hangar Talk
0
06-16-2005 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices