FDX - The New and Improved Rumor Thread
#31
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I guess it depends on whether you think that Fred has one pot of money to pay for 777 pay rates and one pot of money for FDA subsidies and one pot of money for Section 3 or if you think there is one total pool of money the company uses to compensate employees with. The answer probably lies somewhere in between; but the contract is the only way that the pilots have to assure an equitable distrubution.
The LOA as stated in the 1st post sounds great, but what if the company came out and said we can't afford any section 3 increases due to the "unexpected" LOA cost increases. Bottomline why negotiate a change to the contract while you are just starting to renegotiate the whole contract?
The LOA as stated in the 1st post sounds great, but what if the company came out and said we can't afford any section 3 increases due to the "unexpected" LOA cost increases. Bottomline why negotiate a change to the contract while you are just starting to renegotiate the whole contract?
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That is the whole point the contract is all inter-related. Why negotiate one section/change at a time. It plays into the company's hand. What is the next section you think they will want to change with an LOA, my guess, it wont be 4A2b.
#33
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Both sides at the negotiating table spend considerable time questioning whether the other side has the authority and ability to make a deal. So here’s a crazy idea:
How about we unanimously support our negotiating committee’s recommendation (up or down) and in so doing enhance our committee’s effectiveness entering negotiations?
That's what I intend to do.
How about we unanimously support our negotiating committee’s recommendation (up or down) and in so doing enhance our committee’s effectiveness entering negotiations?
That's what I intend to do.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey finally someone admits to voting yes on the 1st LOA. No worries, if the negotiating committee presents it I am sure it will pass by at least 68%. This is an academic discussion of whether it is smart or not.
#35
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We played the last round of negotiations just about right. Unfortunately, the events surrounding the regulated age change distorted every subsequent issue and vote. That baggage appears to still exist and will not serve us well.
#37
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great rumor--and much better than a sharp stick in the eye!
And I'm really glad our contract's amenable date is rapidly approaching.![Wink](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
If the rumor is true, then the "new & improved" LOA can just be pasted into Section 6 of our contract. The time for band-aid LOAs is over.
The company stood up the HKG domicile how long ago? And they have enjoyed the tax equalization $$$s and having HKG-based pilots on-the-cheap ever since. So I really hope they quit being penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Now take care of the flex instructors, change "sick hours" to "personal hours," replace all A-380 references with B-777, and kill or define 4a2b. I'll vote YES on that contract!
And I'm really glad our contract's amenable date is rapidly approaching.
![Wink](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
If the rumor is true, then the "new & improved" LOA can just be pasted into Section 6 of our contract. The time for band-aid LOAs is over.
The company stood up the HKG domicile how long ago? And they have enjoyed the tax equalization $$$s and having HKG-based pilots on-the-cheap ever since. So I really hope they quit being penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Now take care of the flex instructors, change "sick hours" to "personal hours," replace all A-380 references with B-777, and kill or define 4a2b. I'll vote YES on that contract!
![Smile](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#38
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sometimes I feel like this group has the battered wife syndrome. 4a2b isn't even over for a month, the company is making lots more money than they thought they would, and we are lining the troughs to help them make more like we never got smacked around for the last year. At the very least, a rewrite of 4a2b, or deletion of it all together, needs to be a part of any agreement we enter into with the company. Put me in the group that says make it part of the new contract.
BTW, no matter how we do this, the bottom line is it will save the company lots of money and give our most senior trips (Int'l DH's and international 1 departure lines) to comparatively junior pilots willing to relocate overseas in a break even scenario for them. It will likely mean less pilots needed overall so 4a2b could indeed be in play again after all training and relocation's are complete. We really need to think this one through and remember 4a2b.
One last thing, STV's need to be gone from any new agreement, period.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: ANC-Based MD-11 FO
Posts: 328
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"The company stood up the HKG domicile how long ago? And they have enjoyed the tax equalization $$$s and having HKG-based pilots on-the-cheap ever since. So I really hope they quit being penny-wise and pound-foolish."
As long as pilots will bid it, the company has no incentive to change anything. But I agree with your point.
"...change "sick hours" to "personal hours..."
I love that idea! LK might as well quit, he'd have nothing to do.
As long as pilots will bid it, the company has no incentive to change anything. But I agree with your point.
"...change "sick hours" to "personal hours..."
I love that idea! LK might as well quit, he'd have nothing to do.