Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough >

Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2010, 08:45 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by 177RG
OK, S, have it your way. The schedules written during the term of the BM contract were not consistent with the actual terms of the contract. If IPA had the BM contract in today's economic environment, everyone would be working four weeks, maximum duty days, with NO leg number limits or restrictions. TN was able to improve Article 13 (scheduling) for the first time in IPA history. No, it is not perfect, but it could have been much better if IPA had competent counsel writing the language or at least attempting to enforce what the union negotiated. If IPA did not have the current rules in Article 13, you (and every other IPA member) would be up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

Now, if your question is whether UPS is violating those rules, the answer is "Yes." In what way is that CD's fault or responsibility?
Have no idea who "S" is. TN was the poorest example of union leadership I have ever seen. He let CD run her own show and she got trampled by TC, her article needed her to get everything she wanted for it to work TC recognized that and kept the tidbits from getting in the contract. Looking at the old contract schedules and the current contract schedules , the current contract is a miserable failure. Like CD you are blaming someone else for the failure of the negotiator. As to violating the rules, everytime I check on something I find that it is compliance with the contract, I would love to find something to file a grievence about.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 08:49 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by peredavi
, but UPS itself will get even less sympathy as it rakes in hundreds of millions in profit while dumping pilots, mechanics and their families overboard in this economy...all to make that bottom line look a little better. Nice.

B2P
Public and customers don't care. All they care about is package gets from A to B.
If they give it a 2nd thought it'll be, "I guess they're downsizing due to economy, parking old 3 man aircraft and Age 65. Last 2 are for Air/Space Tech readers or maybe The Economist. This story didn't make Economist or NPR, or PBS. Sorry![/quote]

You are probably correct. Ninety days from now the public that absorbed it won't remember it. Lindsay Lohan will have another relapse. Most people don't even remember what happened in New Orleans.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 10:30 AM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
177RG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
Have no idea who "S" is. TN was the poorest example of union leadership I have ever seen. He let CD run her own show and she got trampled by TC, her article needed her to get everything she wanted for it to work TC recognized that and kept the tidbits from getting in the contract. Looking at the old contract schedules and the current contract schedules , the current contract is a miserable failure. Like CD you are blaming someone else for the failure of the negotiator. As to violating the rules, everytime I check on something I find that it is compliance with the contract, I would love to find something to file a grievence about.
Let me make sure that I understand this. Your complaint is that what CD (an IPA member) negotiated would have worked, had not TC (outside counsel for UPS and an RLA specialist) kept certain necessary tidbits from getting into the CBA. Is it your contention that CD should have been responsible for drafting the language in the CBA? Do you understand the concept of "unauthorized practice of law"?

It seems to me that you have just conceded that the Article 13 provisions CD negotiated would have worked, if the language in the CBA had accurately reflected the provisions CD negotiated. Responsibility for that task lies with counsel, not with any member of IPA. So the negotiator wasn't the problem. It therefore seems to me that you are the one blaming the wrong person, and not me.

Last edited by 177RG; 05-26-2010 at 01:20 PM.
177RG is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 11:07 AM
  #54  
Freightmama!
Thread Starter
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

JS, [edit: removed comment] why don't you negotiate for us? Maybe then you could get the maternity and medical leave sections taken out in exchange for something else.

Last edited by TonyWilliams; 05-28-2010 at 02:11 AM.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 11:20 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: I was acquired, Not Hired
Posts: 1,784
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
JS, If you're so smart, why don't you negotiate for us? Maybe then you could get the maternity and medical leave sections taken out in exchange for something else.
Maybe in exchange for severance pay for furloughees ..or maybe a real scope clause that doesn't allow sub-contractors to fly our freight while pilots are on the street. -OR- maybe a clause to prevent MEF during a furlough. Maybe stand-in-stead furlough options to prevent involuntary furloughs.

2000 furloughs were the original number of planned furloughs at American back in 2003. They topped at approx. 2900.

300 are the planned furloughs at UPS...will they be able to operate profitably with 450 on furlough ?

FF
FliFast is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 01:05 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luckydawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: -400 FO
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
Public and customers don't care. All they care about is package gets from A to B.
If they give it a 2nd thought it'll be, "I guess they're downsizing due to economy, parking old 3 man aircraft and Age 65. Last 2 are for Air/Space Tech readers or maybe The Economist. This story didn't make Economist or NPR, or PBS. Sorry!
You are probably correct. Ninety days from now the public that absorbed it won't remember it. Lindsay Lohan will have another relapse. Most people don't even remember what happened in New Orleans.[/quote]

Did you know Lindsay Lohan wheres an ankle bracelet that monitors her alcohol consumption? Apparently it sends a signal once she reaches .02 at a cost of $1500.

I'm sorry, what were we talking about?
Luckydawg is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 01:08 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by 177RG
Let me make sure that I understand this. Your complaint is that what CD (an IPA member) negotiated would have worked, had not TC (outside counsel for IPA and an RLA specialist) kept certain necessary tidbits from getting into the CBA. Is it your contention that CD should have been responsible for drafting the language in the CBA? Do you understand the concept of "unauthorized practice of law"?

It seems to me that you have just conceded that the Article 13 provisions CD negotiated would have worked, if the language in the CBA had accurately reflected the provisions CD negotiated. Responsibility for that task lies with counsel, not with any member of IPA. So the negotiator wasn't the problem. It therefore seems to me that you are the one blaming the wrong person, and not me.
I have conceded nothing. This was/is CD's deal. She negotiated it and let it be presented as a solution to our sched issues. TC is not outside counsel for the IPA he is the negotiator for UPS. Do you actually work for UPS?
757upspilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 01:11 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by Luckydawg
You are probably correct. Ninety days from now the public that absorbed it won't remember it. Lindsay Lohan will have another relapse. Most people don't even remember what happened in New Orleans.
Did you know Lindsay Lohan wheres an ankle bracelet that monitors her alcohol consumption? Apparently it sends a signal once she reaches .02 at a cost of $1500.

I'm sorry, what were we talking about? [/quote]

We should make sure that those ankle bracelets never become part of our uniform.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 01:22 PM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
177RG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
I have conceded nothing. This was/is CD's deal. She negotiated it and let it be presented as a solution to our sched issues. TC is not outside counsel for the IPA he is the negotiator for UPS. Do you actually work for UPS?
Thanks for pointing out the typo.
177RG is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 09:00 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bleedairpacks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: MD11 CA (rtd.)
Posts: 318
Default

Keep your head's up guys. It's going to get better (eventually).
bleedairpacks is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JustUnderPar
Cargo
796
08-13-2010 06:43 PM
ThreeSides
Cargo
22
03-17-2010 10:26 PM
weatherman
Cargo
9
02-15-2010 03:36 PM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
84
06-12-2009 02:19 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 06:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices