Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Maintenance Checks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2010, 03:05 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 29
Default

tennesseeflyboy

Have you ever heard of a guy named Henry Ford?
purple101 is offline  
Old 05-08-2010, 03:25 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by tennesseeflyboy
So how does anyone explain 48 work hours reduced to 22 work hours for a B CHECK, and the maintenance is "better" ??? I beg to differ, you can't have it both ways.
Save money = less maintenance being performed unless there is a NEW way to account for $$$ spent.
Reread Jetmech1's answer. It is accurate and succinct.
It is also the same at many 121 operators, and is common in the industry. Alot of 121 operators move the cards around with FAA approval to manage resources.
Same level of maintenenace is accomplished, just balance out the timeline to fit ops more efficiently. i.e. some inspections get moved up or back within prexisting allowable limits.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 03:41 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Default

Ok, I understand the responses but you have to ask the question .............. Where is this all going and at a time when a company is making $$$ and been taking $$$ out of my pockets and yours .......................... ??? Why is there so much defense out there ? I would want to believe that IF company was not making $$$ on the profit side, then there would be CUTS in areas not done before. You can rob Peter to pay Paul but you have to pay it sooner or later !!!
tennesseeflyboy is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 05:54 AM
  #14  
gets every day off
 
Nitefrater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by tennesseeflyboy
Ok, I understand the responses but you have to ask the question .............. Where is this all going and at a time when a company is making $$$ and been taking $$$ out of my pockets and yours .......................... ??? Why is there so much defense out there ? I would want to believe that IF company was not making $$$ on the profit side, then there would be CUTS in areas not done before. You can rob Peter to pay Paul but you have to pay it sooner or later !!!
I know this may be a hard concept to grasp... but not every lawn is a grassy knoll...
Nitefrater is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 06:02 AM
  #15  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by tennesseeflyboy
Ok, I understand the responses but you have to ask the question .............. Where is this all going and at a time when a company is making $$$ and been taking $$$ out of my pockets and yours .......................... ??? Why is there so much defense out there ? I would want to believe that IF company was not making $$$ on the profit side, then there would be CUTS in areas not done before. You can rob Peter to pay Paul but you have to pay it sooner or later !!!
Are you reading the answers to your questions?

If a "B" check is 22 hours and a "C" check is 42 hours and you shuffle the cards to make them both 32 hours what has been cut? No "robbing Peter" going on! Also, have you ever taken your vehicle in to be fixed? Typically the price quoted is from the established shop rates and times and not what it actually (usually much less) takes to accomplish the repair.

If this is all about the fact that company has robbed us (the pilot group) by their use of 4a2b you are going about it the wrong way. Maintenance has nothing to do with that!
MaxKts is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 02:52 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Stratosphere's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by tennesseeflyboy
My understanding is they used spend 48 hours on B checks, now reduced to 22 hours .......................... so what other maintenance is being reduced here at Purple ? Also, seems that Feds are turning the other cheek. The FSR reports seem to back up what I am hearing on time and money spent on maintenance. What say you ???
Actually Jetmech answer is spot on. The difference you are seeing is due to applying LEAN principles. FX MX IMHO is very ineffeciant. I see a lot of waste here the reason it was never really addressed is that FX used to make an insane amount of profit regardless so it didn't really matter. After this economic disaster the company really is going full bore with this LEAN in every dept. Also the FAA is actually looking quite close at all the airlines now including FX. If you want to see a blatent look the other way in regards to the FAA look no further than the NWA mechanics strike in 2005
Stratosphere is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 03:04 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
MoonF18's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: WB-FO
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Nitefrater
I know this may be a hard concept to grasp... but not every lawn is a grassy knoll...
That is an awesome quote!
MoonF18 is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 03:29 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
Reread Jetmech1's answer. It is accurate and succinct.
It is also the same at many 121 operators, and is common in the industry. Alot of 121 operators move the cards around with FAA approval to manage resources.
Same level of maintenenace is accomplished, just balance out the timeline to fit ops more efficiently. i.e. some inspections get moved up or back within prexisting allowable limits.
Sometimes extending times between check items or doing the work quicker is not better and yes sometimes the FAA, maintenance and the manufacturer get it wrong. This was the case in this crash http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.aska_Airlines_Flight_261
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 07:37 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR
Sometimes extending times between check items or doing the work quicker is not better and yes sometimes the FAA, maintenance and the manufacturer get it wrong. This was the case in this crash http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.aska_Airlines_Flight_261
Yes, but one can infer many conclusions from the NTSB report on 261. Moving inspections is/was not proven to be an unsafe practice in the industry. Alaska adopted unapproved methods in addition to the extensions of modifying maintenance cycles and FAA did poor quality control on that particular procedure. Afterall, an AD modifies a maintenance cycle. It is also routine for an AD to modify inspection cycles. My conclusion is that Alaska's use of unapproved methods and incomplete lubrication/inspection procedures is not an indictment of the practice. Much like extending ETOPS certification. GIGO. 261 only affirmed that FAA needed closer oversight during the process. Just addressing the realities of the business.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 05-10-2010, 12:40 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 231
Default

As jetmech1 says. It's all about the LEAN principles. Do a value stream map of the task required (C check) for example. Look at the the value added (VA) and non-value added (NVA) activity and then improve your work processes to reduce the NVA as much as possible. Great strides have been taken in both base and line MX in the US. There is no reduction in the quality of mx performed.
Flightmech is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tuck
Major
3
08-12-2009 03:34 PM
CaliFlyer
Flight Schools and Training
17
02-07-2009 02:01 PM
Pantera
Regional
21
12-24-2008 08:00 AM
Splanky
Frontier
6
11-04-2008 05:03 AM
G400driver
Fractional
1
09-18-2008 07:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices