Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
IPA: "We are a union, not a social club" >

IPA: "We are a union, not a social club"

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

IPA: "We are a union, not a social club"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2010, 09:35 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

First thing - awesome letter.

Possible stupid question alert......... actually 2 questions:

1- With such direct, no-nonsense language basically telling the membership not to JA or pick up open time, how is this not going to become a "status quo" issue legally? (in light of recent rulings against "job actions" by other airline unions).

2- If this actually isn't a problem, the why the heck have we not seen a similar letter from the Fedex ALPA leadership?
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 09:37 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 529
Default

Did anyone see anything after 767Pilot's post before Adlerdriver's? I know I DID NOT.

Adler, both are in the IPA/UPS 2006 contract.

Last edited by MoosePileit; 05-01-2010 at 09:41 AM. Reason: something smells rotten, though
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 09:45 AM
  #23  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Those figures look great. But figures lie and liars figure ...

Seriously Bob, in spite of the numbers, something doesn't add up.

I have been at Brown a little over 3 years. Lets say 22 bid periods. I have been on RSV for at least 15-16 bid periods at 2 different bases.

My experience as a RSV has been the following:

1) They never have, and probably never will, have adequate staffing during the transitions.

2) When they have ample RSV coverage, there tend to be few trips open.

3) When RSV coverage is at its lowest, there tends to be the most trips in open time.

This is only my observations at 2 bases in 3 years.

But even the numbers you highlighted don't support what is happening in the system. I have seen 3 managers just in PVG alone on the same day, all doing MEF. So much for the law of averages ...
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 09:46 AM
  #24  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by Roberto
Since you asked, I thought I'd do some simple addition to make sense out of the OT and JA numbers.

Last year IPA crewmembers picked up more than 88,000 hours of Open Time and accepted more than 7,000 hours of JA...

How does that relate to daily flying? Broken down into something easier to relate to, 88,000 credit hours per year = about 241 credit hours per day = 40 pilots flying OT per day.

If those hours were not picked up, how would this affect the reserves? I chose 5 May as an average day and looked at the RADAR lists. I totaled the number of reserves scheduled.

The total number of reserves scheduled on May 5 is 390. Of course, quite a few are not available due to vacation, training, military, breaks, sick, etc. I don't know what that number will be, but if we assume about 25% of the scheduled reserves are not available, then that leaves about 300 to cover those 40 OT trips in addition to whatever reserve callouts may become necessary.

Similarly, 7,000 credit hours of JA per year = 19 credit hours per day = 3 pilots per day on average. If all of those go to MEF, that would require, on average, 3 managers per day.

YMMV.
forgot to quote
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 09:57 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownClown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Brown ones
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit
Did anyone see anything after 767Pilot's post before Adlerdriver's? I know I DID NOT.

Adler, both are in the IPA/UPS 2006 contract.
All I saw was a black hole of greed picking up open time.
BrownClown is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 10:01 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew
...So much for the law of averages ...
I agree. Averages do not account for peaks and valleys.

If anyone wants to check my 390 reserves-scheduled number (while 5 May is still on the RADAR lists), this is how it broke down.

Fleet/Captain/First Officer
757 24 32
SDFZ 16 30
ONT 20 29
MIA 15 14
A3OO 29 28
MD11 SDF 34 36
MD11 ANC 11 32
747 14 26
Totals 163 227
Roberto is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 10:31 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 529
Default

Non-IPA Folks, thank you for the support!

IPA Guys- Pullleaaze, STOP FEEDING THE TROLL!

There is a great line in the original "DUSK TIL DAWN". Harvey Keitel's character asks George Clooney's character, in a cleaned up paraphrase:

Are YOU SUCH A Loser that you don't know when you've won?

The dump and burn avatar is PERFECT. How fast can I burn through mine so I can go get yours?!
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 10:34 AM
  #28  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by Roberto
I agree. Averages do not account for peaks and valleys.

If anyone wants to check my 390 reserves-scheduled number (while 5 May is still on the RADAR lists), this is how it broke down.

The total number of reserves scheduled on May 5 is 390. Of course, quite a few are not available due to vacation, training, military, breaks, sick, etc. I don't know what that number will be, but if we assume about 25% of the scheduled reserves are not available, then that leaves about 300 to cover those 40 OT trips in addition to whatever reserve callouts may become necessary


Probably more like 80% are unavailable in some way or another. There's the OBVIOUS that you pointed out ... VAC, BRK, SIK, TNG, etc

But your numbers insinuate that these RSVs are available 24/7 for unlimited contact and flying. But how many RSV are actually available for those 40 open trips ...

In the appropriate seat ? fleet ? and base ?

With the appropriate number of days available ?

At the appropriate call-in period ?

With enough duty hours remaining ?

All of these variables tend to lower the "available" number of RSVs at any given time.

At a glance on paper, it looks like 390 RSVs would be plenty for 40 trips. In reality, the numbers aren't as cut and dry as you would like to think.

Those managers weren't in PVG on MEF covering a peak or valley. Just regular old bid package trips that couldn't be covered with the available RSVs.

Which is EXACTLY why the JA/OT ban is having an effect on the system and why 100% participation in this ban is important. In spite of your beliefs ...

Last edited by CactusCrew; 05-01-2010 at 10:47 AM.
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 10:36 AM
  #29  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit
Non-IPA Folks, thank you for the support!

IPA Guys- Pullleaaze, STOP FEEDING THE TROLL! ...
OK Moose, I am done.

At least I am only wasting time and electrons until Happy Hour starts at Richmond ...

CactusCrew is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 10:56 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
First thing - awesome letter.

Possible stupid question alert......... actually 2 questions:

1- With such direct, no-nonsense language basically telling the membership not to JA or pick up open time, how is this not going to become a "status quo" issue legally? (in light of recent rulings against "job actions" by other airline unions
There is one strong precedent FOR airline unions as it applies to this. A judge ruled that ABEX pilots did not have to pick up open time on their off days. In our case, we negotiated the privelage in our contract in case of furlough. They may chose to ignore that as they have much of the other stuff that they agreed it, but not yet. If they do choose to fight, it has to be a grievance issue instead of a federal court issue. The federal court is where AA and UAL got their weenies smacked
767pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beagle Pilot
Regional
76
03-28-2010 06:19 PM
A320fumes
Major
11
12-28-2009 04:07 PM
UPSAv8tr
Cargo
46
11-10-2009 05:20 PM
vagabond
Union Talk
0
07-13-2009 05:45 PM
jungle
Money Talk
2
08-25-2008 10:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices