Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Hypothetical FDA LOA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2010, 04:32 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: ANC-Based MD-11 FO
Posts: 328
Default

Just before the FDA LOA vote took place, BC was fishing in Alaska and was brought into town for a hastily-arranged union meeting at the Snow Goose downtown. At that meeting, BC said it was most important to simply establish an LOA now so we memorialize in a contract document, that mainline pilots would fly FedEx freight in China. If the LOA was lacking in some areas, that we could and should make improvements in later negotiations.

I disagree with that philosophy but that's what was said at the time.
FDXFLYR is offline  
Old 05-01-2010, 06:28 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by FDXFLYR
Just before the FDA LOA vote took place, BC was fishing in Alaska and was brought into town for a hastily-arranged union meeting at the Snow Goose downtown. At that meeting, BC said it was most important to simply establish an LOA now so we memorialize in a contract document, that mainline pilots would fly FedEx freight in China. If the LOA was lacking in some areas, that we could and should make improvements in later negotiations.

I disagree with that philosophy but that's what was said at the time.

That is right he was worried about them importing Irish pilots right?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-02-2010, 10:41 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FDXFLYR
Just before the FDA LOA vote took place, BC was fishing in Alaska and was brought into town for a hastily-arranged union meeting at the Snow Goose downtown. At that meeting, BC said it was most important to simply establish an LOA now so we memorialize in a contract document, that mainline pilots would fly FedEx freight in China. If the LOA was lacking in some areas, that we could and should make improvements in later negotiations.

I disagree with that philosophy but that's what was said at the time.


I think he didn't see negotiating as beneficial for the 777/MD11 international guys so he just took the company openers. Any reasons given to justify that decision are half baked and downright scary to hear from a NC/MEC

If he really was worried about foreign pilots, he should have stepped aside and let someone without his fear or ignorance do the negotiating. That is not an opinion, it's a truism born from the fact that the company improved the "best we could get" LOA in multiple areas shortly after we ratified it. They didn't have to but they felt sorry for us after we were beaten so soundly at the negotiating table.

Last edited by Gunter; 05-02-2010 at 10:54 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MeXC
Cargo
7
02-08-2010 03:42 PM
The Stig
Regional
250
10-08-2009 07:00 AM
72944
Major
144
08-27-2009 10:04 AM
FlyingW
Major
29
08-21-2009 12:31 PM
K0H1K0
Cargo
91
05-12-2009 05:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices