Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX 777 pay?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2010, 01:01 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PastV1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 11 Capt
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by ictflyer23
Wide-body pay -- period.......
And why would you say that? It's much more efficient than the MD's plus carries more. So why would someone not want a higher pay rate for any aircraft if they have a chance to get it?
PastV1 is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 02:22 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
30 From Bottom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 102
Default

The future is the 777! We could see up to 100 777s by 2020 when other carriers start dumping them for the 787s.
For us to just roll over for widebody pay because 5% of our workforce was greedy and bid the 777 with no pay rate is insane.
I think we should do everything we can for 380 payrates now and just make sure we don't give the greedy bastards retro pay when we do sign the contract.
That way, they are not being rewarded for being dumb asses and bidding the aircraft without a pay rate!

Seriously...we need this rate now or we won't see it for a long time!!!
30 From Bottom is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 02:41 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: FDX MD-11
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by PastV1
And why would you say that? It's much more efficient than the MD's plus carries more. So why would someone not want a higher pay rate for any aircraft if they have a chance to get it?
Now you are applying logic and common sense to the equation. While I agree under normal circumstances, the 777 should have a higher pay rate than the other fleets. The fact that we had people tripping over themselves to bid an aircraft with no negotiated pay rate has completely changed my opinion. I will not support negotiating anything away for a bump in pay for the 777.
Beaver is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 02:44 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Is this thread about all the draft and high line averages in the 777? That's what those that bid it say.

They didn't care about the pay rate with all the bennies they knew were in store for them. Probably still don't care.

No retro. Not with this pilot group/good ole' boy network.

Last edited by Gunter; 03-27-2010 at 03:13 PM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 03:25 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Dracma's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: A300 FO
Posts: 31
Default

Big payrate increases across the board. The only exception is the 777.......it should wait 24 months to receive its raise in order to fund the raises on the other aircraft. Anyone who bids an airplane without a payrate obviously doesn't care what the rate is.
Dracma is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 04:11 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 99
Default

I'm with Dracma on this.
OffRoad5150 is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 04:26 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

I'm a little confused. When we brought on the Airbus, and the MD11 and the MD10, why didn't we hear all of this about the people that bid it? Was there already a separate pay rate established by contract for these aircraft, or was it just assumed that they were wide body playing aircraft?
The Walrus is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 04:28 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
30 From Bottom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 102
Default

I think it maybe harder to get 380 rates 2 years from now. I'd rather make sure we get them, even if it rewards the guys who bid it, then not get them at all and 3-4 years from now we are still flying at WB rates.
30 From Bottom is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 04:43 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ictflyer23's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by PastV1
And why would you say that? It's much more efficient than the MD's plus carries more. So why would someone not want a higher pay rate for any aircraft if they have a chance to get it?
It should never have been bid without a pay rate -- greedy people hurting themselves.
ictflyer23 is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 05:18 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus
I'm a little confused. When we brought on the Airbus, and the MD11 and the MD10, why didn't we hear all of this about the people that bid it? Was there already a separate pay rate established by contract for these aircraft, or was it just assumed that they were wide body playing aircraft?
Because we got duped...

How much negotiating capital did we use up negotiating a payrate for the A380? What could we have gotten 'extra' in our contract if we just rolled over and said that the A380 could be paid at widebody rates?

So now we gave up something for 4 pages in the contract that we can just throw out. Then the company brings on the 777 and pays it at WB rates, and the only leverage we have to get the ULR payrates we negotiated for is for people to stand firm and not bid the 777... but they did, so essentially gave the company something for nothing.
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
NoHaz
Cargo
11
08-21-2009 09:14 AM
jagplt
Cargo
63
12-13-2008 06:16 AM
990Convair
Cargo
82
11-19-2008 10:39 PM
Overnitefr8
Cargo
4
10-20-2008 02:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices