Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Latest O'Gram - kidding me... >

Latest O'Gram - kidding me...

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Latest O'Gram - kidding me...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2010, 12:03 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Good Beer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 97
Default

My best guess would be a "bump and flush excess" from the Bus and 727 L and R seats with 1 excess from every other seat except 777, 757, HKG, and 727 back seat. This allows them to fill a need in the 777 and 757 while drawing down the seats they want. It also prevents peeps in HKG from bidding out since the initial cadres 2 year is up. It would be a sneaky way to fill what are primary vacancies, but what do you expect.

I thought that there was barrier to excessing from a FDA (requires an actual draw down in AC or something to that effect) but I may be wrong.
A single excess from L seat HKG would not necessarily kill POP since any of the other 52 could bid to relieve.
Good Beer is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 12:12 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Good Beer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by pwdrhound
Why wouldn't the 727f/o's that are senior to the most junior HKG captain just bid HKG cap at 100% to relieve excess and get the POP? This is exactly what I did on the last MEM Bus excess and was placed on the virtual POP letter with POP scheduled to start 01/11. I'm around seniority 2900 and still have about 15 guys ahead of me on the virtual letter. You can bid to relieve excess to any position your seniority allows you to hold but you can't create and excess in an FDA, thus POP.
For the same reason that more people didn't do it last time, the lovely settlement agreement that was signed by webb on his way out the door to 777 training. By receiving the POP you are basically giving up a lot of choice about what you can bid if you want to keep it or avoid repayment. That being said if you are willing to go where ever when ever, then go for it.
Good Beer is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 12:26 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
990Convair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Heavily Involved
Posts: 473
Default

Originally Posted by Lindy
Maybe the Bean Counters thought an excess would be less expensive than a Primary/Excess?

Hypothetical:

40 727 F/Os excessed = 40 Training Cycles

As FDXLAG pointed out:

1 Excessed 727 F/O could bid Airbus F/O = 1 Training Cycle
additional excessed Bus F/O bids MD-11 F/O = 2 TCs

now, fat on MD-11 F/Os, (not yet announced MD-11 excess),
MD-11 F/O now excessed bids 727 = 3 TCs

now another 727 F/O excessed to 757 = 4 TCs

instead of a "one-for-one" training, it could possibly be up to 4 training cycles per each pilot excessed off the Airbus

(FWIW, the "junior" Bus F/Os are senior to the bottom +/- 60 MD-11 F/Os)

One bid, including Primary and Excess would be less training and would not create the perception of an abrogation of seniority.

My money is on Red 57 !
Hey Now! PC says "There are no costs associated with training cycles since we own the training facility"!
990Convair is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 12:47 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wildmanny's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Unknown Rider
Posts: 533
Default

Does anyone have an idea how all this is going to be affected as soon as we figure out which end is up concerning Flag ops? Wouldn't this be academic assuming we're going to need a ton of guys in the widebodies just to handle the new rules?

Just wondering...

WM
Wildmanny is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 01:37 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

With BUV and SAM there is a renewed emphasis on not having extra crewmembers on widebody pay. Or on 727 CA or FO pay for that matter.

If the company has to pay buy up, they would rather do it in the cheap seats. All but 727 SO are targets.
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 01:55 PM
  #26  
Trust but Verify!!
 
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD11 CRA
Posts: 684
Default

You guys crack me up! When management runs out of idea's how to best legally exploit the crew force via excesses, they float a balloon and let the APC experts figure out how to do it for them! In the words of Pogo.."I have met the bean-counters and they are us!"
FreightDawgyDog is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 02:21 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
990Convair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Heavily Involved
Posts: 473
Default Flag Ops

Originally Posted by Wildmanny
Does anyone have an idea how all this is going to be affected as soon as we figure out which end is up concerning Flag ops? Wouldn't this be academic assuming we're going to need a ton of guys in the widebodies just to handle the new rules?

Just wondering...

WM
Manny,

It would not surprise me one bit if the company sought a FLAG/SUPPLEMENTAL duality to their certificate with intentions of only dispatching certain international flights under flag, and the rest of the airline under supplemental.

They already have us carrying far less gas than 2 years ago. Perhaps we won't need as many as we would think? Just a thought....hopefully.
990Convair is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 02:30 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by 990Convair
Manny,

It would not surprise me one bit if the company sought a FLAG/SUPPLEMENTAL duality to their certificate with intentions of only dispatching certain international flights under flag, and the rest of the airline under supplemental.

They already have us carrying far less gas than 2 years ago. Perhaps we won't need as many as we would think? Just a thought....hopefully.
FWIW, at the last LCA meeting, I believe "O" said that the FAA would not let us do this. Either we're Flag or not Flag, they won't let us split the certificate. We may be able to keep supplemental for tech flights, I think he said.
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 02:33 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lifizgud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Re-reading George Orwell's 'Animal Farm' and getting scared...
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
FWIW, at the last LCA meeting, I believe "O" said that the FAA would not let us do this. Either we're Flag or not Flag, they won't let us split the certificate. We may be able to keep supplemental for tech flights, I think he said.
I guess at least it's comforting to know that they are ASKING the QUESTION...
Lifizgud is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 02:58 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Default

Is there a response to this mess from the Union ? Why is it, that the Company is allowed to have such "flexibility" with us ? To the guys that are ****ing and moaning about seniority here, go onto next ........................ this is the cards we have been dealt, I don't like 'em either but it ain't goin' away.
tennesseeflyboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Knots2you
Cargo
22
01-03-2010 11:41 AM
Mink
Cargo
8
04-24-2009 03:15 PM
hiredgun
Major
114
03-17-2009 06:03 AM
Squirt
Military
5
02-26-2009 09:26 PM
katana
Regional
7
02-09-2009 10:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices