FedEx MD-10 collides with SWA 737 on taxiway

Reply Subscribe

Page 1 of 4

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-30-2009, 12:20 PM

Auger In

Gets Weekends Off

Thread Starter

Joined APC: Jan 2009

Position: low hanging fruit

Posts: 116

FedEx MD-10 collides with SWA 737 on taxiway

Aircrew Buzz: Taxiway collision at Salt Lake City: Southwest Airlines B737 and FedEx DC-10

No one was hurt and damage wasn't severe. I wonder how many of these we can endure before Lloyd's of London drops us and we have to self ensure. That would be very expensive.

11-30-2009, 01:31 PM

R1200RT

Living the dream!

Joined APC: May 2006

Position: MD-11 Capt

Posts: 915

If SWA was pushing back onto an active taxiway I doubt the push crew at SWA still has a job. I'll bet a months pay the taxing AC had the right of
way. I'm sure Herb can pay for the damage to the MD10 if any. Kinda like PeeWee Herman punching Mike Tyson.

Last edited by R1200RT; 11-30-2009 at 09:10 PM.

11-30-2009, 01:33 PM

HazCan

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Feb 2007

Position: headbanging

Posts: 954

Standby for loads of FCIFs on how to taxi properly. One guy $hits his pants, we all get diapers.

11-30-2009, 01:38 PM

Jetjok

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Sep 2006

Position: Retired

Posts: 3,717

Can you actually see a little 737 on the ground from the cockpit of a DC-10?

11-30-2009, 02:09 PM

sailingfun

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Feb 2008

Posts: 19,698

I talked with someone who was there. This one wont hurt Fedex. The bill is going to be on SWA. Perhaps this will cause them to reconsider wing walkers on pushback.

11-30-2009, 02:14 PM

MaydayMark

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Apr 2006

Position: MD-11 Captain

Posts: 4,304

Quote:

Originally Posted by R1200RT

If SWA was pushing back onto an active taxiway I doubt the push crew at SWA still has a job. I'll bet a months pay the taxing AC had the right of
away. I'm sure Herb can pay for the damage to the MD10 if any. Kinda like PeeWee Herman punching Mike Tyson.

I was disappointed to hear that we had yet another "incident" but RT's thoughts here make a lot of sense to me. We might actually be able to defend this one ... good job RT!

Mark

11-30-2009, 03:08 PM

tennesseeflyboy

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Dec 2007

Posts: 425

ATC should have told FDX about the SWA jet if they were in fact pushing onto an active taxiway ..................... check the tapes !!!

11-30-2009, 04:57 PM

SamFoxpilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jan 2007

Position: B737/FO

Posts: 227

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun

I talked with someone who was there. This one wont hurt Fedex. The bill is going to be on SWA. Perhaps this will cause them to reconsider wing walkers on pushback.

We do use wing walkers on pushback. I'm sure there will be blame to go around. ATC should have notified SWA aircraft to give way to taxiing aircraft prior to push. SWA ground crew should have seen the taxiing FEDEX jet and stopped push. FEDEX crew taxiing should have monitored their wing tip clearance as they taxi'd by another aircraft in close vicinity.

I feel for all involved...not a great position to be in. Could've easily been any one of us on another day.

11-30-2009, 05:10 PM

Adlerdriver

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jul 2007

Position: 767 Captain

Posts: 3,989

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamFoxpilot

FEDEX crew taxiing should have monitored their wing tip clearance as they taxi'd by another aircraft in close vicinity.

I feel for all involved...not a great position to be in. Could've easily been any one of us on another day.

You can't see your wing tips from an MD-10 or MD-11 cockpit.

Not an excuse - just saying, it's not an option to "monitor wing tip clearance", rubber neck and squeak by an obstacle.

11-30-2009, 06:04 PM

#10

AFW_MD11

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Feb 2007

Position: MD11 FO, ANC

Posts: 1,098

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver

You can't see your wing tips from an MD-10 or MD-11 cockpit.

Not an excuse - just saying, it's not an option to "monitor wing tip clearance", rubber neck and squeak by an obstacle.

the obligation (for both aircraft) is to be on the taxiway/ramp taxi centerline - and then the wingtip clearance is already figured in (especially important for DC-10/MD-10/MD-11 that can't see their own wingtips from the cockpit)

if one aircraft wasn't on the centerline, they will probably be the ones blamed if anyone is blamed.