Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Will 4a2b be permanent? >

FDX - Will 4a2b be permanent?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Will 4a2b be permanent?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2009, 03:04 PM
  #31  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
You're talking about normal times without 4a2b in play. Now that we're in it we shouldn't be building VTO lines above 68/85 while bidpacks average less than 68/85. There are no single departure lines as high as the MD-11 VTO max.

You can get contractual and say it can be done per the CBA but the CBA also says 4a2b is to be used to 'Prevent or Delay'. It's not being used that way. It's being used to artificially keep the bidpack averages down.

I'm just saying...
I understand what you're saying, but the guarantee is a floor (whether its 48/60 or 68/85) and the ceiling is still determined by the 13 CH spread! Unfortunately, 4A2b does not address the spread.

Again, just saying!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 03:06 PM
  #32  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by MD10PLT
Lets see some leadership by example from the Senior Pilots. Right now the only guys being affected by 4A2B ae the junior folks.
You mean relative seniority, by equip/seat, right?
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 03:13 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by MD10PLT
Lets see some leadership by example from the Senior Pilots. Right now the only guys being affected by 4A2B ae the junior folks.

Who/where are the guys that say and actually believe this?

I'm a 75% MD Capt, I'm usually on Reserve ... that means that I get paid 3 hours less than ave BLG. How is that a senior guy "not being affected by 4.a.2.b?" Huh?

In fact, with the low line values, I might actually have been paid more as a senior f/o when BLG was in the 80+ range.
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:18 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog
You mean relative seniority, by equip/seat, right?
Yes you are correct.
MD10PLT is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:18 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Busdrivr
You're right. There are always guys willing to pick up draft/vlt. What bugs me is when people on this forum blame the "Memphis" guys for all our problems. Most the FOs I fly with who are on Draft/vlt are commuters who rationalize the trip because they had a day off between trips in Memphis.
Memphis guys are equally guilty, but not more guilty. Let's stop assigning blame on different groups. (Not that you did Purple.)
As to lack of crews, the holidays are coming up and so are the inevitable Memphis ice storms. No amount of money will get me out of my cozy little bed on or near a holiday or during a storm.
I believe heads will roll because of out lack of reserves.
I agree. Somebody above Parker will have to see what is going on before this changes.
FEXFNG is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:34 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Overnitefr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,876
Default

Originally Posted by FEXFNG
I agree. Somebody above Parker will have to see what is going on before this changes.
Originally Posted by Busdrivr
As to lack of crews, the holidays are coming up and so are the inevitable Memphis ice storms. No amount of money will get me out of my cozy little bed on or near a holiday or during a storm.
I believe heads will roll because of out lack of reserves.

Yep, I think the first major ice storm will be catastrophic for the company. There aren't enough guys in Memphis (reserve or living) to cover 50 - 60% of the trips on a given night that would need new crews due to duty day limits from an ice storm.
Overnitefr8 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:35 PM
  #37  
Thx Age 65
 
HoursHore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: MD11CAP
Posts: 1,041
Default

ASBY already in open time for the 24 and 25th. I hope some one is sweating it.
HoursHore is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 06:39 PM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: AERO
Posts: 48
Default

It is simple to see the company decided to change the staffing philosophy to save money, and the math is easy.

Say you have 140 pilots and 7000 hours of flying to cover.

With 100 hard lines @ 70 hours per line, the company would pay a total of 9800 hours for that month. 7000 hard hours plus the 2800 to the 40 reserve holders.

They will never go to "0" reserves, but to illustrate the point, with the same 7000 hours spread over 140 hard lines with no reserves, each pilot only gets 50 hours each and the total pay difference saves the company 2800 pay hours that month. This can only be done under 4.a.2.b, but saves the company a ridiculous amount when applied to all fleets and seats. The closer to the "zero" reserve model they can get, the more they save...

The flying has not really reduced at all, just the staffing model. They used to carry enough crews to be properly staffed for peak and carried a little fluff throughout the year, and reserves to cover all circumstances and make sure the boxes always got there on time. Now, they figure the money saved will more than make up for the occasional missed delivery.

Sad how it's all about the bottom line, and the only one's losing here are both the employees and the customers. Almost guaranteed that come 12-24 months from now, some top 5-10 executives get paid out all the money that has been saved in some silly bonuses.
AirHead328 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 08:03 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,124
Default

Originally Posted by skeebo2
The Arbitrator WILL find in favor of the Company. We Lost. Im still taking all $ bets with 2:1 odd in your favor
$40 for me you're on. I'll email you for my $80 after they decide in Union's favor - or actually in any favor other than the Company's.
Tuck is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 08:11 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,124
Default

Originally Posted by AirHead328
It is simple to see the company decided to change the staffing philosophy to save money, and the math is easy.

Say you have 140 pilots and 7000 hours of flying to cover.

With 100 hard lines @ 70 hours per line, the company would pay a total of 9800 hours for that month. 7000 hard hours plus the 2800 to the 40 reserve holders.

They will never go to "0" reserves, but to illustrate the point, with the same 7000 hours spread over 140 hard lines with no reserves, each pilot only gets 50 hours each and the total pay difference saves the company 2800 pay hours that month. This can only be done under 4.a.2.b, but saves the company a ridiculous amount when applied to all fleets and seats. The closer to the "zero" reserve model they can get, the more they save...

The flying has not really reduced at all, just the staffing model. They used to carry enough crews to be properly staffed for peak and carried a little fluff throughout the year, and reserves to cover all circumstances and make sure the boxes always got there on time. Now, they figure the money saved will more than make up for the occasional missed delivery.

Sad how it's all about the bottom line, and the only one's losing here are both the employees and the customers. Almost guaranteed that come 12-24 months from now, some top 5-10 executives get paid out all the money that has been saved in some silly bonuses.
I wouldn't really say the flying hasn't been reduced. I agree that as of recent, say in the past 2 months, flying has improved to good levels but before that it was pretty bad. If anyone hasn't taken a look at the financial brief of FDX and the industry by ALPA online at the ALPA website, they should - it's very informative.
Tuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lindy
Cargo
35
02-07-2010 12:27 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
23
11-12-2009 06:10 PM
NightBusDriver
Cargo
37
11-03-2009 06:12 AM
Timeoff2fish
Cargo
0
09-26-2009 05:57 AM
Rambler
Cargo
8
03-12-2009 06:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices