Ups 777?
10-14-2009, 09:16 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Agreed.
For better or worse, if FedEx starts to really win over large customers by saying the extra 3 hours or drop off time equals an extra business day faster service due to when the orders have to be on the ramp for the aircraft to launch; UPS will be be under competitive pressure to match service guarantees.
Time to distance on that crossing restriction is dependent on the economic crosswinds
For better or worse, if FedEx starts to really win over large customers by saying the extra 3 hours or drop off time equals an extra business day faster service due to when the orders have to be on the ramp for the aircraft to launch; UPS will be be under competitive pressure to match service guarantees.
Time to distance on that crossing restriction is dependent on the economic crosswinds
10-15-2009, 10:11 AM
#17
Tri-tanic operator
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
10-15-2009, 11:03 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Agreed.
For better or worse, if FedEx starts to really win over large customers by saying the extra 3 hours or drop off time equals an extra business day faster service due to when the orders have to be on the ramp for the aircraft to launch; UPS will be be under competitive pressure to match service guarantees.
Time to distance on that crossing restriction is dependent on the economic crosswinds
For better or worse, if FedEx starts to really win over large customers by saying the extra 3 hours or drop off time equals an extra business day faster service due to when the orders have to be on the ramp for the aircraft to launch; UPS will be be under competitive pressure to match service guarantees.
Time to distance on that crossing restriction is dependent on the economic crosswinds
I'm all for getting 777's in a few years, as they already have, and will get more -400's. Another fleet type will mean more seats for us. While not as good for the UPS bottom line as a 3 airplane fleet they should have it's better for us. With us still stopping in ANC using -400's and MD11's we will need more pilots all other things held constant than Fred who will overfly ANC and shrink the ANC base. Considering the superior UPS profit margin I think we can stand the "loss" to gain/keep seats for us.
Afterall, it's all about us. I'll let UPS worry about their balance sheet (short term), as their stupid aversion to up front costs will cost them but benefit us, as the 777 is clearly the superior airplane is all respects from what I read.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B727DRVR
Cargo
14
08-22-2008 02:23 PM
