Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

IPA Elections

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2009, 03:25 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
Yes! I don't know where this "entitlement" movement has come from. Gereration "y"???

When I was Hired, I was relatively young also, but think 180 degrees from todays 30 year olds. I knew the rules and didn't whine.

If UPS was to furlough, so be it. Is AMR, UAL, or any of the others changing there respective contracts to save the bottom 5%? NO. And they shoudn't. Have any since the 1950's? NO. The bottom go until called back.

I and everyone else in the industry knew how Seniority system's work. I don't want us to furlough, but when I was hired I accepted the possibility.
No dog in this particular battle, just reading with passing interest from across the purple path. It is interesting that you're casting aspersions at Gen. Y and using AMR and UAL as examples. Both of those carriers have had their senior pilots change the rules in the last 30 years to facilitate or extend furloughs and create a B-scale for new hires. The pilots who did that were definitely not Gen. Y and many of them are from them are the same ones reaping the benefits from Age 65. It's not a greed or an entitlement thing, it's a pilot thing.
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 03:32 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by cashcow
UPS had a net income of 401 million last quarter and pilots are lining up to help the pauper, priceless! It beats anything Bob Crandall was ever able to pull off. It is even better than an Eskimo being able to sell snowballs on Greenland in the middle of winter. It is right up there with a beggar donating money to Bill Gates and Warren Buffet. Halloween is coming up so maybe UPS can scare this pathetically weak pilot group some more. Boo. Trick or treat, MOU2. Trick or treat, MOU2.
See my post to Avg Joe regarding the 'premium' paid to UPS. You really need to appreciate the capital markets expectations. If you elect union leadership that doesn't, expect a painful, and worse next CBA. Being loud and brash does not guarantee successful business negotiations. Nor does ignorance of the relationship between profits (necessary for a good contracts) and managements necessity to trim employees to match business demand.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 03:36 PM
  #83  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker

I'm guessing the reason for your complete lack of empathy is because you've never found yourself in a situation that the bottom 300 are looking at right now. It's real easy to sit back and say "that's the way it's always been," and "you knew the deal when you signed up for this," when your job and livelihood aren't on the line. I suspect that you'd be singing a different tune if your six figure salary had the potential of going to zero in one fell swoop.
Yeah, well they knew the deal of retiring at 60 but they are still all here.....LOL!
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 03:48 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
See my post to Avg Joe regarding the 'premium' paid to UPS. You really need to appreciate the capital markets expectations. If you elect union leadership that doesn't, expect a painful, and worse next CBA. Being loud and brash does not guarantee successful business negotiations. Nor does ignorance of the relationship between profits (necessary for a good contracts) and managements necessity to trim employees to match business demand.
So are you saying the company will layoff? or that the MOU is necessary to make the markets happy? What will the leadership of the union do to change how the markets view UPS? What in your opinion is good?bad? That we should make contract concessions?
757upspilot is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 04:11 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by cashcow
It is the same generation that thinks Obama is Messiah and that we all are entitled to FREE healthcare. They just haven't figured out yet that nothing is free. Put the blinders on and run up that deficit. Lets raise the taxes and wonder why when less tax revenue comes in. Is it called socialism. Why does a Captain get paid more than an F/O when both are required to make the airplane move? Why does a 10 year F/O get paid more than a 2 year F/O? Maybe MOU5 can take care of that problem. Wake up America.
Maybe you Favre's haven't figured out how to live within your means so you don't HAVE to work past 60 and that's there's more to life than flying airplanes! Don't you love stereotyping...
Slice is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 04:17 PM
  #86  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by navigatro

If you were in the bottom 300, would you honestly say that saving jobs should come second?
They won't answer that because they don't know how to put themselves in other's shoes. It's all about me me me to them. And they say the junior guys have a sense of entitlement.....LMAO!
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 04:21 PM
  #87  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by Commando

When I was Hired, I was relatively young also, but think 180 degrees from todays 30 year olds. I knew the rules and didn't whine.

If UPS was to furlough, so be it. Is AMR, UAL, or any of the others changing there respective contracts to save the bottom 5%? NO. And they shoudn't. Have any since the 1950's? NO. The bottom go until called back.
So does that mean you will retire at 60? I mean, those were the rules when you got hired.

Did you walk to school in the snow for 10 miles there and back too? LOL
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 04:24 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 135
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
Nor does ignorance of the relationship between profits (necessary for a good contracts) and managements necessity to trim employees to match business demand.
On this we agree. I'm repeating myself, but when a company is overstaffed it usually reduces staff to meet business demand. No problem so far. I'm against a forced confiscation of earnings to buy these jobs (pay ransom). I've NEVER said I was against the voluntary MOU (in principle). If people want to work less and be compensated less I have no problem. I am against the non-contractual aspects of conflict bidding, VAC, how trips are placed into a separate RDG bid bypassing seniority, etc...

As far as MAP... I've never considered it a charity. To me it's simply purchasing short term insurance, with a return of partial premium aspect. It's a simple financial decision, no more.

I'm astounded at how a number of folks act like they're the only ones to ever face a potential furlough. Yes, I've been unemployed... as have HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of others across the globe. Was it fun? Nope. Did I survive? Yep. Never a question in my mind, but it is apparently in doubt for some here by the way they talk.
Avg Joe is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 04:25 PM
  #89  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by Avg Joe

Shaggy, you exhibit a welfare mentality. It is not your neighbors' (the taxpayers of this nation) responsibility to provide for you. It is your responsibility to provide for yourself. That is precisely what my wife and I teach our children. I would never accept a handout from my coworkers to provide for my family. That is my responsibility.
You wouldn't know a welfare mentality if it came up and bit you. Go work in an inner city ER and you'll know what a welfare mentality truly is and where 33% of your paycheck goes.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 04:27 PM
  #90  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by say that again
I'm going to have to disagree with you there, I'm an '88 hire and in the top 200 seniority numbers but I supported, voted for and participate in the MOU.
That's great! Unfortunately I think you are in the minority of the top 200.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
0
09-12-2009 10:01 AM
sardinesnack
Cargo
117
06-10-2009 11:29 AM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
0
09-13-2008 06:04 AM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
3
08-06-2008 07:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices