Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
System Realignment / Displacement Bid Out >

System Realignment / Displacement Bid Out

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

System Realignment / Displacement Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2009, 04:08 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 997
Default

Originally Posted by Vman
Do these number include all of the DC8 crews, it seems there were more...?
No, from the bid announcement:

Displacement Bid 09-202 will displace up to 30 Captains, 33 First Officers, and 46 Second Officers from the DC8. The full displacement of crews from the DC8 will occur in multiple bids offered as training allows.

Still enjoying extended time off:
40 DC-8 CA
42 DC-8 F/O
64 DC-8 F/E
Precontact is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 05:02 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 1 ft out the door
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by Precontact
No, from the bid announcement:

Displacement Bid 09-202 will displace up to 30 Captains, 33 First Officers, and 46 Second Officers from the DC8. The full displacement of crews from the DC8 will occur in multiple bids offered as training allows.

Still enjoying extended time off:
40 DC-8 CA
42 DC-8 F/O
64 DC-8 F/E
That's what I thought...thanks.
Vman is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Wouldn't it make more sense to realign everyone so at least they are "working" (ie. extra reserves....meaning no JAs and OT whatsoever) while they are paying them instead of paying them to do nothing? How is this cost effective?
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 07:41 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
Wouldn't it make more sense to realign everyone so at least they are "working" (ie. extra reserves....meaning no JAs and OT whatsoever) while they are paying them instead of paying them to do nothing? How is this cost effective?
FP,
UPS is limited by training slots and our contract. Even if they moved everyone now on this realignment/displacement, they would still sit and not fly. Outcome remains same. Training pipe is staying full and can't make it eat the crews any faster. If they do it in successive shots, they can more accurately fill seats they really want instead of making that dartboard shot now. A good business decision actually. UPS can more accurately seats to the business requirements 6 months from now. Also, ATL shutdown the fleet all at once allowing no phaseout while employed. This was a new kink for the airline. UPS is taking the charge for the costs associated with shutting down the 8 which is common business accounting.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 04:03 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
brown snowman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: whale driver
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
Wouldn't it make more sense to realign everyone so at least they are "working" (ie. extra reserves....meaning no JAs and OT whatsoever) while they are paying them instead of paying them to do nothing? How is this cost effective?
It's cost effective because of the MOU,the money we gave back
or that they didn't have to pay us is used to finance the guys
that are sitting at home.
brown snowman is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:54 AM
  #16  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
FP,
UPS is limited by training slots and our contract. Even if they moved everyone now on this realignment/displacement, they would still sit and not fly. Outcome remains same. Training pipe is staying full and can't make it eat the crews any faster. If they do it in successive shots, they can more accurately fill seats they really want instead of making that dartboard shot now.
That makes sense.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:55 AM
  #17  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by brown snowman
It's cost effective because of the MOU,the money we gave back
or that they didn't have to pay us is used to finance the guys
that are sitting at home.
Exactly, which is slightly annoying. I signed up to prevent furloughs not to pay for DC8 guys to have paid time off. Of course, I'd rather have the money go to our guys than management.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:40 AM
  #18  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
Exactly, which is slightly annoying. I signed up to prevent furloughs not to pay for DC8 guys to have paid time off. Of course, I'd rather have the money go to our guys than management.
Don't worry, plenty is going to management. In ATL anyway ...
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:52 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ Jay's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Default

So does this mean I won't have to retake my FE written again next year to keep it current?

Hopefully, the economy starts to turn, utilization goes up, and guys start to retire at 65 and all will be right with the world.

I know, I'm dreaming, but without dreams, we aren't living - just surviving.
ERJ Jay is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 12:16 PM
  #20  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew
Don't worry, plenty is going to management. In ATL anyway ...
Thanks for easing my mind Cactus....I was a little worried they weren't getting enough.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Precontact
Cargo
20
06-03-2009 05:56 AM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
234
02-12-2009 09:31 AM
Lester Burnham
Cargo
29
02-11-2009 02:56 PM
scrapdog
Major
6
01-28-2009 08:10 PM
jmoney
Regional
1
09-02-2008 11:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices