Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Thank You Team IPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2009, 08:53 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
Default

If you haven't noticed, we haven't been unified for a long time. The last contract was what 54-46%. And it only passed imho, because of the 40K bonus to anyone here over a year. Everyone knows it. That was more than a whole years pay. Yes, I will walk anytime if UPS pushes it. And the reality is, a MOU and a Contract Vote are two different separate animals. You should be glad many are stepping up who never said they would. 1400 vs. 800 who answered in the Survey.
Commando is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:03 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
highsky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: missionary
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by purpledog
We have a part of the contract that says that BLG will be reduced to a min of 48hrs in a 4 week bid (60? in a 5 week) before any furloughs. We assumed that they had to go to 48/60 however the company interpreted that they could just reduce it to any number they want in each seat. Grievance pending on that. My line for May was 60 while others are full pay, still others are in the 50's. Talk of furloughs have subsided. However,I believe being in position for the recovering economy has a little more to do with that.

Make no mistake fellas, if it wasn't mandatory, we would probably have the same, if not less participation from our group. Good luck guys.
Thanks for clearing that up. I appreciate the reply.

Being in a fully-ready position, by being fat on pilots when the economy rebounds, is why I've always believed that Atlanta would also very much prefer not to furlough, especially when they see that Memphis has kept all the extra pilots on property, current and qualified, ready to fly, with all the excess capacity they need.

That said, I have also believed that Atlanta likes to keep up with the Jones' (Memphis). So, when the FedEx pilots took the giant pay hit, UPS went after the IPA for the same.

Like I've said, UPS WILL get their savings, one way or another. If UPS doesn't get what they want out of this MOU, they WILL furlough, if for no other reason than to save face. I hope I'm wrong on this last point.
highsky is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:08 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
If you haven't noticed, we haven't been unified for a long time. The last contract was what 54-46%. And it only passed imho, because of the 40K bonus to anyone here over a year. Everyone knows it. That was more than a whole years pay. Yes, I will walk anytime if UPS pushes it. And the reality is, a MOU and a Contract Vote are two different separate animals. You should be glad many are stepping up who never said they would. 1400 vs. 800 who answered in the Survey.
Your right, we have not been unified in a long time. I voted yes on the contract because I thought the EB was dysfunctional and I did not believe we would get a better offer in a reasonable amount of time.

As of now 1400 of us can't even donate a minimum amount of sick time to the cause to get the participation #'s up. If the MOU works they would even be able to pick up an opentime trip so they wouldn't be out anything. I'm sorry there is no excuse for us not having 100% participation.
Naven is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:27 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 747-400 FO
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
Are Union will be VERY strong by then. I'm just worried that after being Furloughed, many will sign any contract and never want to Strike.
OUR union, or YOUR union (the guys still on property).

Gud Luk wid dat

Last edited by freightdawg; 06-01-2009 at 09:32 AM. Reason: spelliong
freightdawg is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:45 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
highsky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: missionary
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by Naven
As of now 1400 of us can't even donate a minimum amount of sick time to the cause to get the participation #'s up. If the MOU works they would even be able to pick up an opentime trip so they wouldn't be out anything. I'm sorry there is no excuse for us not having 100% participation.
Exactly.

All they need to do is take a RDG for a bid period or two. Instead of working two weeks a month, they work just one. THEN, in their three weeks off, they pick up an Open Time trip, making up for the week they sacrificed in the RDG. At the end of the day, THEY HAVEN'T LOST A PENNY! Plus, they will have saved jobs, and demonstrated to UPS and their IPA brothers that we are, in fact, a solid union that is not to be F'd with.

Absolutely NO excuse for not participating! NONE.

If we can't get better participation, and/or if this MOU doesn't pass, there will be some very uncomfortable layovers between those who participated, and those who couldn't be bothered with it. I will be "slam-clicking," and doing my own thing.

And to the non-participating Captains who want to assuage their conscience by buying me a sympathy drink at the bar after I return from my three-year, 100% paycut: They can stick that drink where the sun doesn't shine. I won't be interested.

To all those who have, or will contribute to save the 300, and preserve a high quality of life for the remaining 2600, I am grateful. Thanks for your support. I'm proud to be your brother.

highsky
P.O.W. 300
highsky is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:46 AM
  #66  
Registered User
 
viktorbravo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Capt: Lav Truck
Posts: 288
Default

I started to get into this melee on the first page then thought better of it after a while, but I still cant keep my keyboard quiet.

Its at 54% participation now, but thats still woefully unacceptable. I really was optimistic that we could get at least 80% participation.

While I commend everyone who signed up, I cant help but feel a little animosity to those that didnt do a darned thing.

Do those folks not understand that they will be affected by a furlough eventhough they are safe from hitting the street? Can they not see the pink elephant sitting in the room?

Downgrades, forced domicile changes, forced into commuting, losing bidding power, crappy schedules, crappy QOL, no OT/JA, etc.

As a previous poster put it there really is no excuse for non-participation. 10 hours of RDG is easy, just dont buy your 7 dollar coffee, dont buy that new computer for a while, or simply pick up that 10 hours in another month, its not that difficult. One would think that people would do something to help themselves, but I guess they would rather be slapped and feel the real pain.

Last edited by viktorbravo; 06-01-2009 at 09:56 AM.
viktorbravo is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:53 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by freightdawg
OUR union, or YOUR union (the guys still on property).

Gud Luk wid dat
Like I said earlier, by 2014, everyone IF furloughed will be back on property. So it's OUR union. I see a max of two years out, if that long. And most likely around 150. So there will be no consessions given for the "Hostages" still out like FF implied.
Commando is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:06 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 747-400 FO
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
Like I said earlier, by 2014, everyone IF furloughed will be back on property. So it's OUR union. I see a max of two years out, if that long. And most likely around 150. So there will be no consessions given for the "Hostages" still out like FF implied.
I understand your stance, even though I don't necessarily agree with you. My point is that, seeing the level of participation and attitudes of about half the pilot population, we are now broken into those who are threatened, and those who are not.

Irregardless of whether or not any furloughs actually happen.

Damage done, lesson learned. I came from the dog-eat-dog world of the non-sched cargo carriers, and as a group, we wouldn't treat each other like this. I've learned my new lesson - look out for No. 1 only while at UPS.

PS: "concessions" has two "c"s in it

Last edited by freightdawg; 06-01-2009 at 10:07 AM. Reason: spell check, mee tooo
freightdawg is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:21 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Buck92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Unknown
Posts: 372
Default

Originally Posted by freightdawg
...Irregardless ...

PS: "concessions" has two "c"s in it

And "irregardless" is not a word.

"Merriam–Webster even states 'Use regardless instead.' "
Buck92 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 11:19 AM
  #70  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat
Doggy Bag?
Yeah....that's it...LOL!
Freightpuppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
Brown
Cargo
89
11-20-2008 07:20 PM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
0
09-13-2008 06:04 AM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
3
08-06-2008 07:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices