Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX ~ J/S'ing into a trip and duty period... >

FDX ~ J/S'ing into a trip and duty period...

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX ~ J/S'ing into a trip and duty period...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2009, 09:02 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlybyKnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by Cliffy170
3. New Jet, new day. You show for your STAGING jumpseat at 0000hrs and your trip is scheduled to end at 1331hrs. You aren't afforded the protection that staging carries with it - and you have violated contractual language. Now, let's say you book it PERSONAL or BUSINESS. Well, you aren't protected but you aren't violating contractual language, either.
Just to muddy water a little, since some may be forced to split hairs --> "trip is scheduled to end at 1331". Would the trip end time be scheduled Block-In time or scheduled End-of-Duty Day time (block-in + 30min)?? I always used Duty Time just to be on the safe side.
FlybyKnite is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 11:52 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
PurpleTail's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 520
Default

Originally Posted by FlybyKnite
Just to muddy water a little, since some may be forced to split hairs --> "trip is scheduled to end at 1331". Would the trip end time be scheduled Block-In time or scheduled End-of-Duty Day time (block-in + 30min)?? I always used Duty Time just to be on the safe side.
26.J says block in +30, so end of duty period.
PurpleTail is offline  
Old 05-17-2009, 01:20 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlybyKnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 564
Default

Doh!! You mean the answer was in the contract Shame on me for posting without doing my homework .
FlybyKnite is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 05:22 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownGirls YUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 478
Default

On a related subject, has anyone ever had any success in obtaining ACP approval to do a final deviation check-in at a distance greater than 100 miles with the stated intention being to jumpseat in on a FedEx jet and then operate a single leg?
BrownGirls YUM is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 06:23 PM
  #25  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

Yes, I have. The key seems to be to have a viable plan to present to your ACP that gets you in place w/legal rest. I am sure it will vary from ACP to ACP.
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 06:27 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2cylinderdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by BrownGirls YUM
On a related subject, has anyone ever had any success in obtaining ACP approval to do a final deviation check-in at a distance greater than 100 miles with the stated intention being to jumpseat in on a FedEx jet and then operate a single leg?
Never heard of that, doubtful that would fly. The only relief I have heard of is maybe a guy driving and he lives say 150 miles away. If you are jumping in with little to no turn time, like a normal IND hub turn they would have to use draft or a standby (provided they have one in your seat) to cover you in the event you do not make it.

All supposition on the later, but I would put a few pennies on it...never hurts to ask though!
2cylinderdriver is offline  
Old 05-22-2009, 03:31 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

As much as we'd like to think that all FedEx flights operate on time, plenty of times the flight lands (especially into Memphis) late, due to runway, arrival changes, etc, etc. With that in mind, I can't imagine that an ACP would give permission for a check-in outside 100 miles. The reason is that there is no benefit to the company, and indeed, they can only lose. It's your job to check-in within the published parameters, and so what would be in it for them, to allow you to check in early? But, as 2Cylinderdriver said, "it never hurts to ask."

A few years ago I was deadheading from Boston to San Francisco. The flight was scheduled to land 12 minutes after my 100 mile (final) check-in time, and so when the jet started down from cruise altitude, I used my company credit card and an airphone and called VIPS and did my final check-in. My thought process was that we were now within the specified 100 NM distance from the airport. Anyway, the company wouldn't pay the $10 charge I incurred for the use of the airphone, even though I explained that it was being used for company business. Their explanation: VIPS has an 800 number, and is therefore free. Oh well, I'm sure they somehow paid for that call.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 05-22-2009, 08:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok

1) With that in mind, I can't imagine that an ACP would give permission for a check-in outside 100 miles. The reason is that there is no benefit to the company, and indeed, they can only lose.

2)A few years ago I was deadheading from Boston to San Francisco. The flight was scheduled to land 12 minutes after my 100 mile (final) check-in time, and so when the jet started down from cruise altitude, I used my company credit card and an airphone and called VIPS and did my final check-in. My thought process was that we were now within the specified 100 NM distance from the airport.

JJ
1) If you live or will be driving in from 130 miles away, it makes great sense. No benefit to the company? Are you bucking for a management job?

2) One of the most aggressive ways to check in I've ever heard of. This is the one I can't believe people do or would ever be approved of. Can you say diverted flight? No room for error at all.

Last edited by Gunter; 05-23-2009 at 05:33 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 03:42 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

1) If they approve a distance of 130 miles, why not 150, or 200 miles. No wait, why not 300 miles, after all it's only a few more hours. Has anyone been given the ok, when driving, for a further than required final check-in?

2) Yes, it was aggressive, and yes, I've heard of diverting, but my logic was that a) once we started down, we were going to the destination airport, and b) even if we diverted to another Bay Area airport, it was just a cab ride to the hotel. My problem was that because of the check-in time, coupled with having to leave the East Coast and commute to the West Coast, if I actually wanted to be in position, in the hotel (in SFO), then I would have had to leave the day before, which I was unwilling to do. You know, sometimes you just gotta live on the hairy edge, and say what the hell. Besides, if everything turned to Brown, there was always the OAK standby crew, and I hadn't been in front of the SCP for a very long time.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 05:45 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok
1) If they approve a distance of 130 miles, why not 150, or 200 miles. No wait, why not 300 miles, after all it's only a few more hours. Has anyone been given the ok, when driving, for a further than required final check-in?

JJ
If guys can commute in on the FDX jumpseat for several hours before a duty period, a 2 hour drive is easy and offers no additional risk to the ACP. A 3 hr drive wouldn't either.

If you had asked permission I don't think any ACP would have approved the "hairy edge" check in you describe. If you disagree, call one and let us know what they say.
Gunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FredEx
Cargo
54
06-10-2009 11:11 AM
Adlerdriver
Cargo
5
11-14-2008 09:25 PM
purple1day
Cargo
4
09-05-2008 11:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices