Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FedEx Ground wins appeal today (4-21-2009) >

FedEx Ground wins appeal today (4-21-2009)

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx Ground wins appeal today (4-21-2009)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2009, 04:31 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 221
Default

These drivers aren't stupid. Like pilots of competing airlines, they talk to each other and compare notes on pay, benefits, and working conditions. FedEx can claim their drivers are "independent" and "controlling their own success" but the reality is that they're making only about half what their counterparts at UPS make, and there is NO job security to speak of.
Talk to your Ground driver the next time he delivers for you. If he is the "owner" of that route, I bet he is applauding the decision. I know my driver probably is.
purpledog is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:50 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by Normy!
I thought there wasn't supposed to be any political discussion in this forum....
It was a remark...now that you've chimed in it's a discussion.

Moderate yourself.
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 09:56 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by R1200RT
Yea now that Obama is in the hot seat I'm sure he'll come to the aid of the drivers and throw Fred Smith under the bus. As we know Smith doesn't have any political pull and never has.

Whistlin' Dan you want to make a bet on this? I know I'll lose but I'll take Fred and you can bet on Obama's previous record, I'm sure he'll still stand up for the little man and do what's right in the face of big business.
We have a long-standing tradition in this country that workers have a legal right to organize into collective-bargaining groups. Plugging loopholes in those laws which make it difficult, if not impossible for them to do so isn't throwing the employers under the bus. Rather, it brings the letter of the law into conformance with the spirit of the law.

I'm not taking political-sides here, just commenting on what I believe to be the record of our current President in the matter of employee mis-classification.

The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.

I wonder what the typical pilot's life would be like if FedEx started "franchising" air routes and types of equipment?
Whistlin' Dan is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 10:03 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
We have a long-standing tradition in this country that workers have a legal right to organize into collective-bargaining groups. Plugging loopholes in those laws which make it difficult, if not impossible for them to do so isn't throwing the employers under the bus. Rather, it brings the letter of the law into conformance with the spirit of the law.

I'm not taking political-sides here, just commenting on what I believe to be the record of our current President in the matter of employee mis-classification.

The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.

I wonder what the typical pilot's life would be like if FedEx started "franchising" air routes and types of equipment?
Why doesn't he go to work for UPS?

As to your question it would work better for some and worse for others; no wait, that is the way it is now!
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 10:05 AM
  #15  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

B Hussein Obama will fix it all, no worries. I'm sure he'll get right on it after he covers my mortgage this month.
FXDX is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 10:12 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Fred pays a penalty for using his business model. In fact there are probably more drivers needed with the seperate entities. Force fred to change the model and less drivers will be working. Of course the remaining drivers will make more and have better bennies; I hope your driver is one of the ones that keeps his job. But I doubt it, doesn't sound very ambitious.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 10:48 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Why doesn't he go to work for UPS?
I don't know. Probably for the same reason FedEx pilots organize and fight for better wages and working conditions at FedEx, rather than just apply for similar jobs at UPS.
As to your question it would work better for some and worse for others; no wait, that is the way it is now!
Just curious...who would it work better for, and how? I'm having a hard time coming up with a company where such an arrangement has ever worked to the employee's benefit.

It's somewhat ironic that the company who lobbied against UPS' using "independent contractors" to operate their air fleet is now defending the practice as applied to their own ground fleet.
Whistlin' Dan is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 11:15 AM
  #18  
Trust but Verify!!
 
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD11 CRA
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Fred pays a penalty for using his business model. In fact there are probably more drivers needed with the seperate entities. Force fred to change the model and less drivers will be working. Of course the remaining drivers will make more and have better bennies; I hope your driver is one of the ones that keeps his job. But I doubt it, doesn't sound very ambitious.
Alert..Alert..major thread drift!!!

Pardon me but are you talking about Fred's ideas or our union leaders Age 60 retro policy? Less drivers needed while the ones at the top make more (Every retro guy I know is flying way above BLG {or blocking his calendar} while we get 20% less so they could come back and fly). Of course when you figure in the the pension money they give up so they can continue to fly over 100 hours a month at straight pay they really are paid like part time employees. I just wish their actions hadn't made us all part timers..

I know, I know, get over it. If all we lost was 5 years of seniority I would be. Problem is we are all taking a pay cut to keep these guys flying, and most of them are doing the job of 2 pilots when it comes to pay while the rest of us suffer BLG loss. It is hard to move on with the shiv still twisting in your back!

Here's to NL out of ANC who is having his retirement party at Age 60 as we speak. Good old HC will be in attendance, after all his retirement parties he took and then came back. Good that he found time with all the extra flying he has been doing. Maybe the good sense of Old St. Nick will rub off on him while he is there? Not holding my breath..

Thank you. I feel better now..
FreightDawgyDog is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 11:28 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
I don't know. Probably for the same reason FedEx pilots organize and fight for better wages and working conditions at FedEx, rather than just apply for similar jobs at UPS. Just curious...who would it work better for, and how? I'm having a hard time coming up with a company where such an arrangement has ever worked to the employee's benefit.

It's somewhat ironic that the company who lobbied against UPS' using "independent contractors" to operate their air fleet is now defending the practice as applied to their own ground fleet.
My guess is he can't get a job at UPS because those jobs are in demand and hard to come by. An independent contractor took pity on him and hired the guy to perform a service. Now the guy is trying to take the livelyhood of the independent contractor away.

Well, granted you would have to be well versed in nuance to see that I did not say it work would work better for anyone if fred farmed out the flying. But offhand, if Fred farmed out the MEM-SHV run at a reasonable rate I could take it over, hire a bunch of ungratefull shmucks, and turn a nice profit on it while working from home. Too bad the feds would never go for it.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:34 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.
Does the driver you talked to work for Express or Ground?
matty is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
HankHill
Cargo
35
04-06-2009 12:55 PM
nightrider
Cargo
39
03-28-2009 06:26 AM
2cylinderdriver
Cargo
54
12-22-2008 10:17 AM
fdxbusdriver
Cargo
13
11-18-2008 06:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices