FedEx Ground wins appeal today (4-21-2009)
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 221
These drivers aren't stupid. Like pilots of competing airlines, they talk to each other and compare notes on pay, benefits, and working conditions. FedEx can claim their drivers are "independent" and "controlling their own success" but the reality is that they're making only about half what their counterparts at UPS make, and there is NO job security to speak of.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Yea now that Obama is in the hot seat I'm sure he'll come to the aid of the drivers and throw Fred Smith under the bus. As we know Smith doesn't have any political pull and never has.
Whistlin' Dan you want to make a bet on this? I know I'll lose but I'll take Fred and you can bet on Obama's previous record, I'm sure he'll still stand up for the little man and do what's right in the face of big business.
Whistlin' Dan you want to make a bet on this? I know I'll lose but I'll take Fred and you can bet on Obama's previous record, I'm sure he'll still stand up for the little man and do what's right in the face of big business.
I'm not taking political-sides here, just commenting on what I believe to be the record of our current President in the matter of employee mis-classification.
The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.
I wonder what the typical pilot's life would be like if FedEx started "franchising" air routes and types of equipment?
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
We have a long-standing tradition in this country that workers have a legal right to organize into collective-bargaining groups. Plugging loopholes in those laws which make it difficult, if not impossible for them to do so isn't throwing the employers under the bus. Rather, it brings the letter of the law into conformance with the spirit of the law.
I'm not taking political-sides here, just commenting on what I believe to be the record of our current President in the matter of employee mis-classification.
The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.
I wonder what the typical pilot's life would be like if FedEx started "franchising" air routes and types of equipment?
I'm not taking political-sides here, just commenting on what I believe to be the record of our current President in the matter of employee mis-classification.
The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.
I wonder what the typical pilot's life would be like if FedEx started "franchising" air routes and types of equipment?
As to your question it would work better for some and worse for others; no wait, that is the way it is now!
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Fred pays a penalty for using his business model. In fact there are probably more drivers needed with the seperate entities. Force fred to change the model and less drivers will be working. Of course the remaining drivers will make more and have better bennies; I hope your driver is one of the ones that keeps his job. But I doubt it, doesn't sound very ambitious.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
I don't know. Probably for the same reason FedEx pilots organize and fight for better wages and working conditions at FedEx, rather than just apply for similar jobs at UPS.
Just curious...who would it work better for, and how? I'm having a hard time coming up with a company where such an arrangement has ever worked to the employee's benefit.
It's somewhat ironic that the company who lobbied against UPS' using "independent contractors" to operate their air fleet is now defending the practice as applied to their own ground fleet.
As to your question it would work better for some and worse for others; no wait, that is the way it is now!
It's somewhat ironic that the company who lobbied against UPS' using "independent contractors" to operate their air fleet is now defending the practice as applied to their own ground fleet.
#18
Fred pays a penalty for using his business model. In fact there are probably more drivers needed with the seperate entities. Force fred to change the model and less drivers will be working. Of course the remaining drivers will make more and have better bennies; I hope your driver is one of the ones that keeps his job. But I doubt it, doesn't sound very ambitious.
Pardon me but are you talking about Fred's ideas or our union leaders Age 60 retro policy? Less drivers needed while the ones at the top make more (Every retro guy I know is flying way above BLG {or blocking his calendar} while we get 20% less so they could come back and fly). Of course when you figure in the the pension money they give up so they can continue to fly over 100 hours a month at straight pay they really are paid like part time employees. I just wish their actions hadn't made us all part timers..
I know, I know, get over it. If all we lost was 5 years of seniority I would be. Problem is we are all taking a pay cut to keep these guys flying, and most of them are doing the job of 2 pilots when it comes to pay while the rest of us suffer BLG loss. It is hard to move on with the shiv still twisting in your back!
Here's to NL out of ANC who is having his retirement party at Age 60 as we speak. Good old HC will be in attendance, after all his retirement parties he took and then came back. Good that he found time with all the extra flying he has been doing. Maybe the good sense of Old St. Nick will rub off on him while he is there? Not holding my breath..
Thank you. I feel better now..
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
I don't know. Probably for the same reason FedEx pilots organize and fight for better wages and working conditions at FedEx, rather than just apply for similar jobs at UPS. Just curious...who would it work better for, and how? I'm having a hard time coming up with a company where such an arrangement has ever worked to the employee's benefit.
It's somewhat ironic that the company who lobbied against UPS' using "independent contractors" to operate their air fleet is now defending the practice as applied to their own ground fleet.
It's somewhat ironic that the company who lobbied against UPS' using "independent contractors" to operate their air fleet is now defending the practice as applied to their own ground fleet.
Well, granted you would have to be well versed in nuance to see that I did not say it work would work better for anyone if fred farmed out the flying. But offhand, if Fred farmed out the MEM-SHV run at a reasonable rate I could take it over, hire a bunch of ungratefull shmucks, and turn a nice profit on it while working from home. Too bad the feds would never go for it.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 394
The FedEx driver I talk to isn't happy with the court's decision. He makes $13.75/hr, has crappy benefits and NO job security, while his buddy at UPS makes $22+, has full bennies, and can transfer to another location with seniority should it become necessary. Mention "Independence!" or "Being in charge of his own success!" to him and he's likely to kick you in the shins.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post