Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS - 747F domicile in the lower 48? >

UPS - 747F domicile in the lower 48?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS - 747F domicile in the lower 48?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2009, 06:25 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?

The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well. Screwing your employer by "jamming them at every opportunity possible" makes you an ignorant left wing liberal zealot. If you want job for life protection during every downturn go love in North Korea.
You say "That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well".
Actually, that money doesn't come from UPS or the IPA, it comes from our customers. And yes, we all want and need UPS to do well.
Obviously, money is derived from me and every other UPSer providing a service to OUR customers. It isn't charity, and certainly nothing is given without a long drawn out negotiation. It is business. Expect it. We all do.
Point your frustration at UPS management. Why?

UPS has good management and lousy leadership.
Anyone can manage but few management teams lead well or creatively in a tough business environment. Here is an opportunity for the company to lead yet they will only manage. A furlough is one answer, but a distinctively disruptive and IMO counterproductive response.
The IPA offered the requested savings, UPS says not sufficient, they contest the numbers blah, blah, but voluntary leaves of absences are real savings as opposed to forced leaves. Many airlines routinely use voluntary leave before furlough. CAL and Skywest come to mind.
So remember, everyone on the property wants UPS to succeed better than anyone else in the business. You earn what you bring to the company. They haven't hired anyone because of charity. We earn our customers money by moving packages. The best in UPS management cannot figure out how to move that package except by an airplane if it goes by air. We beat everyone at that metric. So if it goes, it is because it makes money and serves our customers expectations.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 02:51 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker
How many millions did you say UPS lost in Q4, 2008...
How many employees does UPS have in the USA and worldwide? What is the cost of their plant and equipment? This is relevant because it puts the net profit in context. For instance, if you were an employer/owner of a company with 20 employees and a capital requirement for plant and equipment of some substance, what would you expect to take out of that company per year? Would $50,000 be enough? $100,000? $200,000? $500.000? What would that be per employee? Compare your answer to what UPS makes per employee, and consider the cost of the UPS plant and equipment that makes this possible.

Last edited by Roberto; 04-12-2009 at 03:50 AM.
Roberto is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 04:16 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse...
We don't have to wait until UPS gets rid of the last DC8. We already have about 300 pilots manning a fleet that has 8 airframes in the working inventory...
Roberto is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 05:52 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Roberto,
Just remember, DOD is releasing billions in contracts this week for DOD air charters, and UPS could put all those airframes and aircrews to work profitably if they were interested. We will see.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 06:02 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
Default

Originally Posted by Roberto
We don't have to wait until UPS gets rid of the last DC8. We already have about 300 pilots manning a fleet that has 8 airframes in the working inventory...

Roberto, we all understand the fact that we are a bit fat right now. The union even understands this point. That's why mil leave, personal leave, job share seem to be logical solution to the problem. I also have a HUGE problem with trying to save 54 million while increasing pay for some over 700%. I also have a big problem with the company turning down DOD charters(heard it from someone in the union) when we have sooooo much extra lift and pilots. As someone has stated before, UPS has mastered tripping over a dollar to pick up a dime.

Happy Easter!!
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 10:53 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UPS1856's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
Roberto,
Just remember, DOD is releasing billions in contracts this week for DOD air charters, and UPS could put all those airframes and aircrews to work profitably if they were interested. We will see.
Hmm... Interesting how the DOD contracts and the furlough decision are the SAME week.

If we nail a bunch of contracts and jobs are saved, Eric Gerdes deserves a whole BUNCH of beers from the <300.
UPS1856 is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 11:04 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 245
Default

Originally Posted by UPS1856
Hmm... Interesting how the DOD contracts and the furlough decision are the SAME week.

If we nail a bunch of contracts and jobs are saved, Eric Gerdes deserves a whole BUNCH of beers from the <300.
They're probably not interested in DOD because they know they will need those airframes for our lifts that's picking up!

they won't furlough a single person!
SLPII is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 12:50 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 358
Default

Salty-


I know you have worked hard on getting the info out re. DOD contracts, do you know if UPS will be making a bid for some of this flying?
FR8TFLYER is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 04:59 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by FR8TFLYER
Salty-


I know you have worked hard on getting the info out re. DOD contracts, do you know if UPS will be making a bid for some of this flying?
They will bid, they always have. It is the magnitude of the opportunity that is unknown. Like a FedEx team value of 1.4 billion and UPS team goes in the 190 million range this year. No reason UPS couldn't go for hundreds of millions more in contracts. The IPA certainly gave the company the ability.....
and somewhat on topic,<g>, UPS could definitely sell the 747's volume on daily DOD business and use the 11's to do same as well as fly DOD full time. Everything else flows up to backfill.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 04-12-2009, 05:27 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rottweiler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 157
Default Stimulus $$$

C'mon, Obama! Throw some of that stimulus money Brown's way!
Rottweiler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SLPII
Cargo
231
02-08-2017 10:25 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices