Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS - 747F domicile in the lower 48? >

UPS - 747F domicile in the lower 48?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS - 747F domicile in the lower 48?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2009, 03:06 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
say that again's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by FR8TFLYER
If the company furloughs in light of all the savings the IPA has come up with, the bitterness created by this will cost them for years to come. I personally will carry it with me until my last day on the property. It will be my personal agenda to jam them at every opportunity possible. I have talked with enough of my peers to know that this same feeling is held by many others as well.
Now you know how the class of '88 feels towards our benevolent employer. It's been 21 years and the ill will still has an effect.
say that again is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 03:38 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tigerpilot1995's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SDF A300 FO
Posts: 441
Default

Originally Posted by say that again
Now you know how the class of '88 feels towards our benevolent employer. It's been 21 years and the ill will still has an effect.
Until the furlough announcement I really didn't understand. Sometimes I found it hard to believe how one could be so bitter. It only took a second to understand when the furlough was announced.
Tigerpilot1995 is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 05:47 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
say that again's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by Tigerpilot1995
Until the furlough announcement I really didn't understand. Sometimes I found it hard to believe how one could be so bitter. It only took a second to understand when the furlough was announced.
Check out Tod Nichols post on the B&G. Spot on accurate.
say that again is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 12:19 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
To Stay or Go's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by FR8TFLYER
If the company furloughs in light of all the savings the IPA has come up with, the bitterness created by this will cost them for years to come. I personally will carry it with me until my last day on the property. It will be my personal agenda to jam them at every opportunity possible. I have talked with enough of my peers to know that this same feeling is held by many others as well.

Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?

The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well. Screwing your employer by "jamming them at every opportunity possible" makes you an ignorant left wing liberal zealot. If you want job for life protection during every downturn go love in North Korea.
To Stay or Go is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:23 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?

The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well. Screwing your employer by "jamming them at every opportunity possible" makes you an ignorant left wing liberal zealot. If you want job for life protection during every downturn go love in North Korea.

Don't worry, the company is doing just fine. In fact, they are doing quite well. Loads are down, but they ARE begining to pick up. There is a reason they don't give the flight crews the volume each night like in the past. They want you to think the sky is falling and want you to give something back when certain leaders in this company get a 700% pay increase. You are either in management or have been drinking the brown water. UPS is doing just fine, and will come out of this recession even stronger.

The IPA does not pay you, but they sure the hell do a lot to make sure you get paid what you get paid. If UPS wants to ignore the cost savings presented by the IPA, more power to them. It only proves one thing though. It proves this is nothing more than an attempt to open up our contract and for us to take consessions. If you can't see that, you must be blind!
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:41 PM
  #26  
Permanent Reserve
 
navigatro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,682
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?

The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well. Screwing your employer by "jamming them at every opportunity possible" makes you an ignorant left wing liberal zealot. If you want job for life protection during every downturn go love in North Korea.

You make some valid points, from a purely financial perspective.

However, good companies (e.g. Southwest) have learned that if you take care of the employees, they will pay you back many times over.

Pilots (especially at a cargo company offering on-time guarantees) may be in the unique position to cost the company a LOT more than what they would save by furloughing.

Of course the company has a responsibility to the bean counters and the shareholders. A furlough may look good on paper, but it could cost them in the long run.
navigatro is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:50 PM
  #27  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?

The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well. Screwing your employer by "jamming them at every opportunity possible" makes you an ignorant left wing liberal zealot. If you want job for life protection during every downturn go love in North Korea.

When UPS turns their back next week on over $50 million in VOLUNTARY savings offered by the IPA, how is this about your companies "need to do well" ??

And just how should the bottom 300 react to this ... Offer assistance to their struggling employer at every opportunity ? I know that's what I'll be doing. Watching UPS make BILLIONS in spite of themself !!!

I do take solice in knowing that " the well-being of our employees is paramount .... "


par-a-mount [par-uh-mount]
–adjective
1. chief in importance or impact; supreme; preeminent: a point of paramount significance.
2. above others in rank or authority; superior in power or jurisdiction.

Thanks JB
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 01:55 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tigerpilot1995's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SDF A300 FO
Posts: 441
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?

The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well. Screwing your employer by "jamming them at every opportunity possible" makes you an ignorant left wing liberal zealot. If you want job for life protection during every downturn go love in North Korea.
Sounds almost exactly what an ACP told me a few days ago. I hope you enjoy the concessions you had no say over taking.

Nice attempt at stirring the pot. Straight out of management 101.

100% IPA Give up nothing!
Tigerpilot1995 is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 05:01 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Archie Bunker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Brown 747-400
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Why? Loads are down, the economy is reeling, and we have an abundance of underused flight crew right now. If someone decides to get rid of the -8s the problem will get much worse. How can you expect UPS not to furlough under this circumstance?
How many millions did you say UPS lost in Q4, 2008...one of the worst quarters in the history of the US economy since the Great Depression? Oh that's right, they didn't lose anything, they made in excess of $250M net profit! This is the same company that wants to give the CEO how many hundred percent of a pay raise next year? Yet, this same company threatens to kick the bottom 300 pilots to the curb because they need $54M in savings. Yeah, I'm buying that line of BS.

The whole reason behind this furlough threat is about power, control, and opening up the contract for as many concessions as they can squeeze out of us. Have another pitcher of that tasty management Kool-Aid.

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
The IPA does not pay me. Bob Miller is not sending my kids to college. That money comes from UPS and I need the company to do well.
So...how many JAs have you flown in the last 6 months, or do you have a little M on your ID card already?
Archie Bunker is offline  
Old 04-11-2009, 05:24 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker
How many millions did you say UPS lost in Q4, 2008...one of the worst quarters in the history of the US economy since the Great Depression? Oh that's right, they didn't lose anything, they made in excess of $250M net profit! This is the same company that wants to give the CEO how many hundred percent of a pay raise next year? Yet, this same company threatens to kick the bottom 300 pilots to the curb because they need $54M in savings. Yeah, I'm buying that line of BS.

The whole reason behind this furlough threat is about power, control, and opening up the contract for as many concessions as they can squeeze out of us. Have another pitcher of that tasty management Kool-Aid.



So...how many JAs have you flown in the last 6 months, or do you have a little M on your ID card already?
Well said arch!
Shaggy1970 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SLPII
Cargo
231
02-08-2017 10:25 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices