Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Avoiding furlough at UPS slides >

Avoiding furlough at UPS slides

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Avoiding furlough at UPS slides

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2009, 05:43 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
say that again's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by Tigerpilot1995
I believe he is referring to the $350 an hour some guys were making. I understand our same pay for fleet deal makes things very different and much more difficult to compute.
Is that a fact? Did anyone actually make $350 per hour and if so, what percentage of that pilot group made that kind of coin?
say that again is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 06:28 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airbum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by say that again
How do you figure 2/3 pay? What criteria did you use to arrive at that number?
off the top of my head, it was a approximation. if memory serves some legacy pay was around $260 in 2001. inflation based to today that would equal around $305 compared to UPS pay of $237 requiring a 29% pay increase to have the same buying power today. The legacy pay was on a 757/767 ? That is the smallest plane now at UPS. this is all public school math.

. Granted hourly pay is not everything but its something.

My main point again is that the senior and over 60 folks in the IPA are not to blame. UPS over hired pilots, the economy dumped and hundreds of great folks have stepped up to the plate to help out the most vulnerable of us.
Airbum is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 07:33 PM
  #83  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 245
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
I would think that having him look back and find that it may not have been necessary to leave or find that those that hung in are getting help from those of us still on the property would be bad enough. I hope he finds what he wants while away.
why would you wish ill on someone who looks to have food on the table for his family? I tried UPS, it didn't work. I can't have a life after UPS? Just because you're safe and we're not...that makes us fools to look elsewhere?? get real. were u born with a silver foot in your mouth?
SLPII is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 08:18 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Buck92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Unknown
Posts: 372
Default

Originally Posted by SLPII
why would you wish ill on someone who looks to have food on the table for his family? I tried UPS, it didn't work. I can't have a life after UPS? Just because you're safe and we're not...that makes us fools to look elsewhere?? get real. were u born with a silver foot in your mouth?
You don't think UPS is a job worth coming back to? Figure once the -8s are finally parked, the economy swings back and retirements start at a normal pace (2011 or 12), don't you think career progression will get back on step? It seems to me that if UPS is a "lost cause" airline job, NO airline job is worth it -- what better airline gig is there to be a bottom 300 guy at? Honest question -- not looking to poke anyone in the eye.
Buck92 is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 08:46 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 245
Default

Originally Posted by Buck92
You don't think UPS is a job worth coming back to? Figure once the -8s are finally parked, the economy swings back and retirements start at a normal pace (2011 or 12), don't you think career progression will get back on step? It seems to me that if UPS is a "lost cause" airline job, NO airline job is worth it -- what better airline gig is there to be a bottom 300 guy at? Honest question -- not looking to poke anyone in the eye.
One's gotta be crazy to get into another aviation job, most jobs in the U.S. at the present pay less than unemployment benefits.

I accepted a position completely out of aviation for the time being. We'll see how that goes.

As for coming back. I don't rule that out. Most of us got blind-sided by age 65, who knows if there is age 70 in the works? If that is remotely a possibility..I'm not taking it up the (u know what) again. Seriously will do my homework when I am offered to put on the brown uniform again. Not going to blindly jump in both feet with no lifeline during the next go-round.

Hoping for the best for all of us here at Brown. It is a mighty beast THE IPA is fighting, the outcome can not be guaranteed.

Good luck to all.

Last edited by SLPII; 04-08-2009 at 09:03 PM.
SLPII is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 09:35 PM
  #86  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by Airbum
Cactus I agree perhaps I overstated that comment, we are still working for about 2/3s pay compared to the legacies prebankruptcy contracts. My point was that many of those old dudes did alot of work to improve things.

AGREED ... sorry to start a 2/3 pay public math debate. At least you got my point.

The same thing happened to me at Cactus. It was a second tier stepping stone to the majors until 2001 !!

Their contract became the target of the legacys. Managements target. By virtue of the others downfall, AWA became a desireable employer. Then came the merger ... Similar to the UPS deal.

And that is NOT to take anything away from the strides that were made at this place since 1988 ...

BACK TO TOPIC ...

there is actually nothing we can do to avoid a furlough. UPS will do what they want in the end. They will put at least 100 on the street this year. Just to show they can ...

CactusCrew is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 09:54 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by SLPII
why would you wish ill on someone who looks to have food on the table for his family? I tried UPS, it didn't work. I can't have a life after UPS? Just because you're safe and we're not...that makes us fools to look elsewhere?? get real. were u born with a silver foot in your mouth?
My response was to another post that was deleted by a moderator. The post I was responding to was not nearly as pleasant as mine. I hope you find what you are looking for elsewhere since this appears to be what you want. I think it may not be necessary, as I stated. You may do as you please.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 02:06 AM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 245
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
My response was to another post that was deleted by a moderator. The post I was responding to was not nearly as pleasant as mine. I hope you find what you are looking for elsewhere since this appears to be what you want. I think it may not be necessary, as I stated. You may do as you please.
My apologies.
SLPII is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 05:03 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
say that again's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by Airbum
off the top of my head, it was a approximation. if memory serves some legacy pay was around $260 in 2001. inflation based to today that would equal around $305 compared to UPS pay of $237 requiring a 29% pay increase to have the same buying power today. The legacy pay was on a 757/767 ? That is the smallest plane now at UPS. this is all public school math.

. Granted hourly pay is not everything but its something.

My main point again is that the senior and over 60 folks in the IPA are not to blame. UPS over hired pilots, the economy dumped and hundreds of great folks have stepped up to the plate to help out the most vulnerable of us.
I'm in complete agreement with you post with one exception. You used a lot of "ifs" in your assumption.
say that again is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 07:36 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by Shaggy1970
Anyone checked out the slides? I thought reducing the bid line Guarantee was not part of the discussion? Someone tell me whats with over 50% of the folks in the IPA voting for it??? I am confused! Kick these clowns out of the office and tell them to pound sand already! Don't give them a dime. I rather be furloughed than deal with this bull$hit. Someone please explain this to me. Salty where are you?
So there is less flying, and therefore less of a need for our current staffing. I'm sure the IPA can say if this is true or not. Your opinion is to not give a dime and let the bottom get furloughed? I'll tell you what, I've given before, and I'm not for giving up contract items. That being said, lowering the guarantee is a little different. Everyone suffers a little to keep everyone employed. If you want unity, it goes both ways.

cp
cessnapilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
L'il J.Seinfeld
Cargo
72
11-01-2011 02:55 PM
brownie
Cargo
200
03-05-2009 07:55 PM
AKPlacer
Cargo
34
12-19-2008 04:07 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices