Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Downbid Training @ FedEx >

Downbid Training @ FedEx

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Downbid Training @ FedEx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2009, 04:50 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Great White North
Posts: 391
Default

...looks like more will try to flock to the 777 F/O and 57 F/O to hold on to their Cpt or WB pay longer...It'll take over 2 years to get trained in those seats...well, unless you get excessed again to the 27

Nice "little" twist before the extended bid release
Cujo is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 04:56 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by Jumbo Pilot
If at the end of this process we end up with an EXTRA 150-250 people in the back of the 27 than are needed to fly the schedule at "normal" BLGs; I would bet that those (we) S/Os would gladly work the reduced blgs even down to 48/60. 48/60 is better than 0/0.(furlough)

Now.. don't get me wrong. I am not the type of person that will go along with the company philosophy just because they are throwing a few crumbs. But I am saying it makes it easier to do since they split up the lines by crew position.

JP
While I empathize with you, are you advocating that selective groups of people negotiate their own BLGs? What happens when in the future, the Company decides to preemptively apply this "precedent" to selective fleets/seats? Too many ramifications to consider here. Even if this were possible, you have just described a CBA not worth the paper it is written on, in fact might as well write it on swiss cheese.
TimoC is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 05:02 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jumbo Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 1 on big twin
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by TimoC
While I empathize with you, are you advocating that selective groups of people negotiate their own BLGs? What happens when in the future, the Company decides to preemptively apply this "precedent" to selective fleets/seats? Too many ramifications to consider here. Even if this were possible, you have just described a CBA not worth the paper it is written on, in fact might as well write it on swiss cheese.
Again I say... Don't get me wrong... I am not agreeing with how the company has implemented 4a2b. I am saying that the way they have done it, has made it easier for them. It is not right and I fully support our union grieving the issue. I was making an observation.
Jumbo Pilot is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 06:32 PM
  #14  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

ha Ha Ha Ha ha Hee Hee Hee Hee!!!!!!!! These guys in Mgmt are cracking me up!!!! There is no "auto eror" on this "Down-bid" FCIF. I bet a bunch of folks (excessed Capts) changed their bids to the right seat of current A/C for seniority and changed the "alignment " that the Co. wanted. JMHO. Discuss.
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 06:57 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gderek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 285
Default

I agree with Jumbo Pilot, based on the company interpretation of the 4a2b. I think they will dump another 150-200 in the back, get rid of all passover pay, evaluate the economy, and if no furlough drop lines in the back to 48/60. As someone on the panel, i'd be happier with 48/60 than 0/0 but I wouldn't want to see any givebacks on the CBA. I mean if the company loses the 4a2b grievance there will be less money to pay back.
gderek is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 08:31 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: AERO
Posts: 48
Default

"If at the end of this process we end up with an EXTRA 150-250 people in the back of the 27 than are needed to fly the schedule at "normal" BLGs; I would bet that those (we) S/Os would gladly work the reduced blgs even down to 48/60. 48/60 is better than 0/0.(furlough)"

Just out of curiousity, how long are you willing to ride the 48/60 hour train? For the next 3-5 years till mandatory retirements start kicking in and thinning out the pilot workforce? What if the company says you get to still work your 15/19 days on reserve and like it? It's hard to get another job if you are still on the hook for your workdays, especially as a commuter.

I'm pretty junior and don't want to lose my job either, but would that not just be a "B" scale for everyone in the bottom airplane to get 48/60 hours because we have 150% plus staffing in the 727 while they staff the other aircraft to appropriote amounts and pay them all at or near normal BLGs?
AirHead328 is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 08:39 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Great White North
Posts: 391
Default

[quote=AirHead328;580730]...

Just out of curiousity, how long are you willing to ride the 48/60 hour train? For the next 3-5 years till mandatory retirements start kicking in and thinning out the pilot workforce? ...quote]

I would venture to guess a slew of retirements are going to take place in Nov-Dec as the elders will have their '10 vacation bank and not stick around for the contract debate. Too many risks with retirement in the next contract...IMHO
Cujo is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 08:50 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gderek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 285
Default

[quote=Cujo;580734]
Originally Posted by AirHead328
...

Just out of curiousity, how long are you willing to ride the 48/60 hour train? For the next 3-5 years till mandatory retirements start kicking in and thinning out the pilot workforce? ...quote]

I would venture to guess a slew of retirements are going to take place in Nov-Dec as the elders will have their '10 vacation bank and not stick around for the contract debate. Too many risks with retirement in the next contract...IMHO
I agree on the retirements. I think we'll see a bunch go before the next contract. There could be a lot to lose for those guys.

As for it being a B scale and willingness to ride the 48/60 train. I agree, it is akin to a B scale. I however doubt it would last 5 years and also think the union has a good chance of winning the grievance, unless the new contract is signed before it is settled. I'm fortunate that I can handle the 48/60 so I have a different perspective.

With that said, it's imperative that ALPA sticks to its guns here so this whole 4a2b thing cannot be used as it is in the future. I guess it's all part of that "hidden money"
gderek is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 10:14 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX
Looks like FR8Hauler nailed it: His post from a couple of weeks ago:

"You will be given minimal training if you are going from left seat to right seat of the same aircraft. Mark my words 1-2 weeks tops. I highly recommend you broaden your horizons and learn another aircraft in another domicile."

Today's FCIF confirms this as the case. Nice to know the day before the bid closes!
Don't tell my wife that I am right every once in a while. Almost as slimey of a move as their cancleling the bid the other day.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 10:47 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Delco92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 68
Default

When FDX posted FCIF 09-132, Down Bid Procedures, what happened to FCIF 09-??? about the delay in Posting 09-02 until 1500z 19 Mar 09? I cannot find it in the FCIFs anymore.

Does this mean yet another delay?
Delco92 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 12:25 PM
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
Precontact
Cargo
1
09-22-2008 07:55 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-05-2005 04:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices