FDX--- Excess Practice #2 No Good -- ReDo
03-13-2009, 03:26 PM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Heavily Involved
Posts: 473
03-13-2009, 03:27 PM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Continuing The Dream
Posts: 161
e. A posting may not be amended after it is published. The Company may, however, cancel any posting prior to its closing.
Is changing the closing date of the posting an amendment? I haven't read that far into the CBA, but it might be something to consider this weekend.
Is changing the closing date of the posting an amendment? I haven't read that far into the CBA, but it might be something to consider this weekend.
03-13-2009, 03:28 PM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Heavily Involved
Posts: 473
Oh, I like you thinking! Delay, delay, delay. That's this "soon to be bumped" pilot's train of thought!
03-13-2009, 04:36 PM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
No worries, I was just playing around. Not enough of us admit when we're wrong anyway. I'm not getting the feeling that we're being toyed with, more that we have two factions (company and union) who have never been down this road before which means missteps and other 'fun'. As Gunter said, for whatever reason, I think the company is pretty determined to actually run the excess bids to fruition this time. In the end they may or may not modify things via cancellations and future vacancies, but it looks like they want to go through with step 1. I think that if a 'global solution' is actually negotiated, many will be disappointed because they will expect it to be linked to a stop or mitigation of the excesses and I don't think it will be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
