FDX 09-02 Recap
03-08-2009, 04:38 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Great White North
Posts: 391
FDX 09-02 Recap
Just looking at some numbers. One would have to assume the numbers in all but the 57 and 27 are good for the company since they were "right sized." Way fat in the 57 this year. What are good crew ratios for the 57 and 27? Might give us an idea how fat we really are and what to expect next from the company. Discuss...
4363 pilots from the % list
260 Excesses
A/C # Sen
777C 123 (5-916)
777F 122 (505-3343)
09 – 0
10 – (245 divided by 2 crew divided by 4 planes) 30 crew per a/c
11MC 731 (1-2200)
11MF 720 (274-4170)
11LC 93 (42-1782)
11LF 100 (243-3669)
11AC 151 (24-2252)
11AF 185 (1805-4240)
09 – (1980/2/108) 9.1 crew per a/c
10- (1980/2/107) 9.2
30MC 568 (2-2213)
30MF 498 (245-4168)
30HC 70 (108-3922)
30HF 36* (1532-4670)
* 27 still vacant
09- (1072/2/99) 5.4 crew per a/c
10- (1072/2/84) 6.3
57C 100 (344-2424)
57F 197 (1525-4458)
09-(297/2/7) 21.2 crew per a/c
10-(297/2/16) 9.2
27C 230 (173-2978)
27F 220 (628-4575)
27S 219 (15-4679)
09-(669/3/50) 4.5 crew per a/c
10-(669/3/52) 4.3
4363 pilots from the % list
260 Excesses
A/C # Sen
777C 123 (5-916)
777F 122 (505-3343)
09 – 0
10 – (245 divided by 2 crew divided by 4 planes) 30 crew per a/c
11MC 731 (1-2200)
11MF 720 (274-4170)
11LC 93 (42-1782)
11LF 100 (243-3669)
11AC 151 (24-2252)
11AF 185 (1805-4240)
09 – (1980/2/108) 9.1 crew per a/c
10- (1980/2/107) 9.2
30MC 568 (2-2213)
30MF 498 (245-4168)
30HC 70 (108-3922)
30HF 36* (1532-4670)
* 27 still vacant
09- (1072/2/99) 5.4 crew per a/c
10- (1072/2/84) 6.3
57C 100 (344-2424)
57F 197 (1525-4458)
09-(297/2/7) 21.2 crew per a/c
10-(297/2/16) 9.2
27C 230 (173-2978)
27F 220 (628-4575)
27S 219 (15-4679)
09-(669/3/50) 4.5 crew per a/c
10-(669/3/52) 4.3
03-08-2009, 05:25 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: headbanging
Posts: 954
If I'm reading this right, the 757 is pretty heavy in 09, but not 2010. Seems like they would be heavy somewhat in that plane, since it is a growth a/c. Being a little light in the 727 would also be ok, since it is going away? Nice work Cujo.
03-08-2009, 08:22 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,535
The 757 right seat is skewing the crews/ac quite a bit. If the F/O numbers were in line with the C numbers, it would be ~14 this year and ~6 next year.
I would expect the 757 F/O seat to be the next one with a sizable excess bid, the captain seat doesn't seem that far out of proportion for next year and may even be a bit undermanned.
I would expect the 757 F/O seat to be the next one with a sizable excess bid, the captain seat doesn't seem that far out of proportion for next year and may even be a bit undermanned.
03-08-2009, 10:34 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Great White North
Posts: 391
I know the numbers seem off...but it's right off the percentages. I know a few on PLOA/MLOA and they are on the list.
57 C - 100 F/O-197. That changes things but I just took total #'s and divided by 2
30HC- 70 F/O-36 with 27 slots still open
My guess is 57C (-25)...57 F/0 (-100)...27 F/O (-1)
What if they put a (-1) on the 27 S/O? Another free pass for the over-60 or continue to force guys to HKG?...just trying to plan since I'm moving down...alot
57 C - 100 F/O-197. That changes things but I just took total #'s and divided by 2
30HC- 70 F/O-36 with 27 slots still open
My guess is 57C (-25)...57 F/0 (-100)...27 F/O (-1)
What if they put a (-1) on the 27 S/O? Another free pass for the over-60 or continue to force guys to HKG?...just trying to plan since I'm moving down...alot
03-09-2009, 05:16 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
