FDX-Holy HULL-LOSS Batman!!!
#21
Total OFP May 09 minus Total OFP May 10
Yes
I don't --- I did post what I know about the 727 as reported by management in Jan 09 (FP=80 OFP=57)
Agree. Will the company provide this information to the union directly, if asked?
Are there folks with friends in MX or Scheduling that have access to such data???
Yes
I don't --- I did post what I know about the 727 as reported by management in Jan 09 (FP=80 OFP=57)
Are there folks with friends in MX or Scheduling that have access to such data???
#22
I'm looking for the hidden money in 4.a.2.b? Spoke with BC about it ... he basically said they didn't think it would ever apply, so they didn't want to waste resources on it!
I guess they dropped the ball on that one?
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 482
Frustrating being in the dark like we are. I would think the economic "bottom" is for planning purposes around this summer, so an accurate may 09 fleet plan would help some of us near the bottom have an idea where we stand. And then that HKG bid may 09 fleet plan suddenly shifts to a new mention of operational aircraft out of the blue.
#25
My general point in posting all of the data and pointing out the difference between FP and OFP is that there is not a huge hull loss as the casual observer may have initially concluded.
I think there will be a relatively large shift from the A300 to 757, and eventually the 777 --- but, that is precisely what the company has been telling us all along.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post