Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Excess Bid Strategies >

FDX - Excess Bid Strategies

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Excess Bid Strategies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2009, 07:04 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DiamondZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by FDX1
Yeah, I'm sure that would be about as well attended as your last LEC meeting in MEM.
If its scheduled as a part of initial indoc, Id imagine it would be well attended. As for continuing education, have a class or powerpoint presentation that can be viewed on the website. It really is not that difficult.
DiamondZ is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:44 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by FDX1
Honestly, I think they might just send you a copy of :
Sect 24 Filing of Vacancies
Section 11 Training
Section 6 Relocation Expenses

I just think there are too many variables regarding this issue and how each pilot is impacted may be somewhat different. There's a boat load of info to hunt through to make sure you don't screw the pooch on this thing all while trying to maximize your potential benefit, if there is one!

I think they would actually prefer to be called so you can speak of your specific situation with them rather than publishing a readers version digest and laundry list of what ifs.

But I understand we like(love) checklists and what to do in case of an emergency so we can be precise and accurate in our assessment... its in our blood. I'm just not sure if that will happen.

When I open the contract I just use the old "Find" tab and enter the word or phrase and it usually will bring you to all the applicable sections painfully, one at a time. Then I just make my own notes.
Very true. I just don't think anyone really knows for sure. I have a real bad feeling about all of it or I do not think the company would be plowing ahead. I think hiring your own lawyer once this excess goes down to hold the company to task on this move stuff will be the only alternative. They are not going to just go out and buy 500 houses.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 09:51 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,126
Default

As I understand it from the CBA in order to get your home bought you have to

a) be within 100 miles of base (that takes out 2/3 of MEM pilots from the start and about 50% of LAX pilots) and

b) move to the new base within 100 miles - that means move you and your family I believe. Can't just buy a crashpad in ANC and keep the wife in MEM. If she's listed as a dependent on your insurance I believe they can ask for proof of residency.

Do you really think even 25% of those displaced will fall into this category?
Tuck is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:33 AM
  #34  
Fill'er Up Again
 
FrankTheTank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,090
Default

BID TO RELIEVE!

Another airplane and/or domicile! That is the best strategy that I can find. Make this one cost big bucks! Even the FCIF recognizes the power of 'Bid to Relieve' and the complexity that it creates!
FrankTheTank is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:42 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 757 Captain
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank
BID TO RELIEVE!

Another airplane and/or domicile! That is the best strategy that I can find. Make this one cost big bucks! Even the FCIF recognizes the power of 'Bid to Relieve' and the complexity that it creates!
As opposed to involuntarily excessed? Please explain the advantage of your position (my ignorance - not doubting your posit). Gracias.
Logs is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:49 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Busdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 480
Default

Keeps him in his seat if you bid to relieve.
Busdrivr is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 06:02 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Brad4est's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by Tuck
As I understand it from the CBA in order to get your home bought you have to

a) be within 100 miles of base (that takes out 2/3 of MEM pilots from the start and about 50% of LAX pilots) and

b) move to the new base within 100 miles - that means move you and your family I believe. Can't just buy a crashpad in ANC and keep the wife in MEM. If she's listed as a dependent on your insurance I believe they can ask for proof of residency.

Do you really think even 25% of those displaced will fall into this category?
Not quite accurate. The relevant bit from the contract states:

6.B.2. Distance Limitations
A pilot shall not be entitled to a move package unless:
a. the domicile (or base in the case of an FDA) to which he is moving is more than 50 nautical miles from his current domicile (or base in the case of an FDA); and
b. the permanent residence to which he is moving is more than 50 nautical miles from his current permanent residence; and
c. the domicile (or base in the case of an FDA) to which he is moving is more than 50 nautical miles from his current permanent residence; and
d. the residence to which he is moving is within 100 nautical miles of the domicile (or base in the case of an FDA) to which he is moving; and
e. the residence to which he is moving is in the same country as the base.

So yes, you do have to move within 100 miles of new domicile, but no your present home doesn't have to be within 100 miles of current domicile. There is a "crash pad" move option you are also eligible for.

Yes, I do think well over 25% will fall into this category. Whether they will avail themselves of it remains to be seen. If you commute to MEM, you could probable commute to ANC. Commuting to HKG, not really an option.

Bottom line, if you are looking at this as a way to "scam" the company for extra bucks, you'll be disappointed. If you are actually looking for assistance for a bona-vide move, it's pretty reasonable. IMHO
Brad4est is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 07:46 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by Brad4est
Not quite accurate. The relevant bit from the contract states:

6.B.2. Distance Limitations
A pilot shall not be entitled to a move package unless:
a. the domicile (or base in the case of an FDA) to which he is moving is more than 50 nautical miles from his current domicile (or base in the case of an FDA); and
b. the permanent residence to which he is moving is more than 50 nautical miles from his current permanent residence; and
c. the domicile (or base in the case of an FDA) to which he is moving is more than 50 nautical miles from his current permanent residence; and
d. the residence to which he is moving is within 100 nautical miles of the domicile (or base in the case of an FDA) to which he is moving; and
e. the residence to which he is moving is in the same country as the base.

So yes, you do have to move within 100 miles of new domicile, but no your present home doesn't have to be within 100 miles of current domicile. There is a "crash pad" move option you are also eligible for.

Yes, I do think well over 25% will fall into this category. Whether they will avail themselves of it remains to be seen. If you commute to MEM, you could probable commute to ANC. Commuting to HKG, not really an option.

Bottom line, if you are looking at this as a way to "scam" the company for extra bucks, you'll be disappointed. If you are actually looking for assistance for a bona-vide move, it's pretty reasonable. IMHO
Absolutely, if you really want to move to your new domicile it is the way to go. Nothing about living 100 miles away from your current domicile.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:05 AM
  #39  
Fill'er Up Again
 
FrankTheTank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,090
Default

As opposed to involuntarily excessed? Please explain the advantage of your position (my ignorance - not doubting your posit). Gracias.
Bid to Relieve complicates things because it minimizes the numbers being involutarily excessed which accomplishes two things. 1) does not excess those intended/desired, at least initially, and 2) creates more training cycles which could be extremely costly. So the more they have to excess to get to the final numbers = more houses bought, more training costs, possible recovery to economy (doubtful but possible), some retirements, delays the inevitable but keeps the negotiating ball in our court.

I am not very senior in seat but would likely keep it or at least I did on the last go around. So as to not confuse my motives, I intend to 'Bid to Relieve' to the MD-11.
FrankTheTank is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:15 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 77
Default

Excess bids are being planned based on modelling conducted with current standing bids. Posting 8-03 was cancelled before the bid closed because of the "apparent" cost of relocation and training. I doubt that will happen this time, but you never know. Uncertainty was the driving factor. Uncertainty is also being used to divide us. The modelling software doesn't care what you actually want to bid or what is best for your family. In the end, everyone will bid what is best for them on the final. What matters is what you bid while they are evaluating the numbers. If you change your standing bid before the excess is posted and then change it immediately before and after the practice bids it may render their modelling impotent.
31Hz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
31Hz
Cargo
6
02-17-2009 03:11 PM
steel
Cargo
13
02-12-2009 06:46 PM
NoKoolAid
Cargo
69
01-26-2009 03:57 AM
990Convair
Cargo
28
01-05-2009 06:48 PM
990Convair
Cargo
82
11-19-2008 10:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices