FDX stock flying high
#51
Nice try, but I'm not biting
Originally Posted by fecav8r
Well isn't that noble of you...
Originally Posted by fecav8r
...you can make your own decisions.
P.S. Ambivalence, noun; an uncertainty as to which approach to follow.
#52
[QUOTE=RedeyeAV8r]
You really don't want me to answer that question.
Originally Posted by FoxHunter
And the results????[/QUOTE
Foxhunter.............
You seem to think nothing has any effect.
The company is not moving 1 iota at the Table...............while ALPA has made 3 proposals.....each one more concerssionary than before.
Just what do you propose be done to achieve a fair settlement?
Meaning a settlement that the Majority of FedEX ALPA members would ratify?
Foxhunter.............
You seem to think nothing has any effect.
The company is not moving 1 iota at the Table...............while ALPA has made 3 proposals.....each one more concerssionary than before.
Just what do you propose be done to achieve a fair settlement?
Meaning a settlement that the Majority of FedEX ALPA members would ratify?
#55
Originally Posted by fecav8r
Wow, that's way over my head. "Your defensiveness indicates your ambivalence"? What the heck does that mean? ........... And you insinuate the majoirity are adhering to this policy. How do you figure. If they were we would see wide spread flight cancellations. Have you seen 'em. So obviously the majority really don't agree with you.
Ambivalance- I don't have the resources at hand, look it up.
#56
See, there you go again. You need to reread all my posts. I don't do drf or vlt! I just happen to think that if you think you shouldn't do it, I respect that decision. Unless you're doing something that goes against the contract, knock yourself out. By the way, how do you know that skeds now has to make 10 calls when they used to make 2? Sounds good anyway. And as far as working during a work action, are we in one? Did I miss the email saying that we shouldn't do it from Wally and the boys. Yeah, that's what I thought. If and when there is a work action I will take all the information I have at my disposal, sit down with my family, and make a rational decision whether or not I will participate. I will not blindly follow a bunch of lemings off that cliff. See you keep confusing reality with your version of reality.
#57
I can only speak for myself here. I resolved to contribute 100.0% on the day The Company walked away from facilitated negotiations. To me, that action indicated they are unwilling to negotiate in good faith, and they lack the consideration of my contribution to the bottom line and the success of The Company. They no longer want me to go above the call of duty to get the job done, so I won't.
- The truth only hurts if it should -
- The truth only hurts if it should -
#58
Originally Posted by dckozak
It doesn't take a majority to dft/vlt to cover the trips that need covering. If it takes schs ten calls when it used to take two, than they are still covered and (the same) minority is there to cover the slack. If the fact that FedEx hasn't had to cancel is your justification for (you) doing dft/vlt, than by extention, if the company (says) there are operating during a work action, you will cross the picket line because, "everone else is".
Ambivalance- I don't have the resources at hand, look it up.
Ambivalance- I don't have the resources at hand, look it up.
#60
Doing the right thing
Originally Posted by FR8Hauler
Turned down a very easy draft trip today. Could have made a lot of money with little time away from home. But I did not do it. These guys who can't suck it up and refuse the quick buck for the long term reward are killing us.
You got to figure that out on your own.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post