Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Secondary Lines?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2009, 06:17 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Default

Md-11. Right Seat. 58:00 VTO.
purplepilot is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 08:23 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Default

Viper, you are so correct about all the verbiage regarding RETIREMENTS and VEBA ...................... Union recommended this CBA to the Crew Force and it was voted in ; next time I hope that we all step back before we jump in ; Just because it is recommended does not mean it is good for all of us. I have a big problem with the way it was all presented and promised ; half-truths will not be forgotten or forgiven ...................................
tennesseeflyboy is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 08:44 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Just because it is recommended does not mean it is good for all of us.
True, berry, berry true.

I have a big problem with the way it was all presented and promised ; half-truths will not be forgotten or forgiven ...................................
Don't forget, but I suggest you forgive going forward or at least understand what happens when any agreement is sent out of ratification with an endorsement. Typically MEC's, make 2 votes-one to accept the agreement and send it out for ratification and one on whether or not they should send it out with an endorsement. MEC's tend to want to put out a message of unity within their ranks, so the 2 votes are rarely mentioned or explained to the membership. It's rarely an issue for MEC's unless you have something like the FDA LOA where there is a dissenting vote. In that case, all that is required is a written con statement from the opposition. There is absolutely no other requirement beyond that for the MEC/MC/NC to talk about any of the potential negatives in any deal, only why they feel that it should be ratified. In fact I've heard theory before that actively presenting the negatives of a potential deal could be considered not fulfilling the duties and responsibilities of their elected position leading to charges, etc. That's bs imo, but it has been used by MC's at other carriers to get the people presenting at roadshows to toe the line. The bottom line for us line swine is that we have to understand how the ratification process works, ask questions, think, ask some more questions and make an informed decision. You simply cannot rely solely on roadshow advice to make that decision, but in general it's the nature of the system/bylaws that makes it that way not the officials involved.

Last edited by Daniel Larusso; 01-29-2009 at 11:07 AM. Reason: sp.
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 08:48 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Do you want to fight?

I don't care what skirts they hide behind nothing excuses the joint Company/MEC dog and pony shows pushing the LOAs. Luckily many of those involved are gone and the head pimp is on the way out.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 08:57 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,084
Default

Originally Posted by tennesseeflyboy
Viper, you are so correct about all the verbiage regarding RETIREMENTS and VEBA ...................... Union recommended this CBA to the Crew Force and it was voted in ; next time I hope that we all step back before we jump in ; Just because it is recommended does not mean it is good for all of us. I have a big problem with the way it was all presented and promised ; half-truths will not be forgotten or forgiven ...................................
New rule. ALWAYS vote down the first TA!
MEMA300 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:00 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,084
Default

Originally Posted by nakazawa
Refer to CBA 25.D.1.a-e, and 25.D.2.a-e. A couple things. The CBA allows for a 13 hour split between low and high line.
Old contract had a 8 hour split between low and high line. Someone correct me if I am wrong. This contract was and is now clearly evident a piece of $H@#.
MEMA300 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:36 AM
  #17  
Fill'er Up Again
 
FrankTheTank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,090
Default

Old contract had a 8 hour split between low and high line. Someone correct me if I am wrong. This contract was and is now clearly evident a piece of $H@#.
You sir are correct... POS.. Wish I read and understood the TA better!

Hour splits, optimizer, higher health care premiums, training conflicts, VEBA, the list goes on!
FrankTheTank is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:04 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

A300 F/O - 64:45 on a VTO.
Deuce130 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoki
Regional
11227
04-26-2017 08:03 AM
trigg41
Cargo
4
01-10-2009 10:24 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
thrustsetrj200
Regional
32
11-22-2008 08:11 PM
Deuce130
Cargo
10
09-25-2008 11:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices