Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Communications from the NC >

FDX - Communications from the NC

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Communications from the NC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2009, 01:33 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy
Unless the reserve utilization is near 100%...Your argument leaks water.

If the company is paying one guy an extra 72hrs, and another guy to sit on his arse at home, for half of his R-days, for 60...They are wasting their money. Make that "OUR" money.

We've hashed and rehashed whether a loss of carryover hours would be used for new lines(less reserves), or higher BLGs. You figure out which a company would do if they're trying to cut costs. Seems that we've already reduced alot of carryover and I certainly don't see higher BLGs.
If you lower the BLG you create more flying lines and fewer reserve lines. So fewer guys "sit on their arse" at home.

A very effective way to lower BLG is to take hours out of the month's flying by attaching it to the previous month as carryover. We've hashed and rehashed this? Apparently not enough. JG seems to think it affects BLGs. He mentions it in his message line.

100% utilization? That's definitely not the number they are looking for. They need some reserves for those blips due to weather and sick calls. But if the average reservist flies, for example, 40 hrs it looks better when the RLG is lower. 40 hrs flown out of 58 paid is higher utilization than 40 out of 68.

Sorry, can't agree with you.

Last edited by Gunter; 01-28-2009 at 01:39 PM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 01:46 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Reduction of carryover has not resulted in higher BLGs for two reasons

1) They keep upgrading guys into fat seats

2) Hours keep getting reduced in every bid pack (Except HKG and 757)
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 04:59 AM
  #63  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by Magenta Line
Reserve utilization reaches 45% system wide not including December......

Now that's funny!
Heck, the Company would just draft instead of calling reserves.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 05:47 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

The company continues to upgrade folks into the widebody seats, CA and FO. That's why Boeing SOs are continuing to upgrade to FO. Overmanned? Sure. But the company is not acting like it with upgrades. Why are we paying for training and the higher pay rates as a result of these upgrades?

I think it is because they want low BLGs to cut costs. No other cost savings measure is being considered.

It cuts our training pay for recurrent.
It cuts pay for flexes to do "draft" sim support.
It increases reserve utilization without an increase in reserve flying. (Cuts their pay)
It drastically cuts the pay of the bottom 30% in each seat and cuts it below 68/85 for over 50%

Once again the company has a single minded drive in one direction. Forget all other ideas to help the company's bottom line.

Don't even get me started on how we could have kept the 757 line open and received new 757s instead of the worn out ones coming....At a much higher cost than we thought we would pay.

For those of you who think the company has got it all figured out....I advise you to think again.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 06:16 AM
  #65  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
The company continues to upgrade folks into the widebody seats, CA and FO. That's why Boeing SOs are continuing to upgrade to FO. Overmanned? Sure. But the company is not acting like it with upgrades. Why are we paying for training and the higher pay rates as a result of these upgrades?
True dat. My buddy just came back from a 9 month LOA. Left as a 727SO and started training this week in the MD-11. He'll be the junior pre-nugget FO (he was the caboose for 4 months until nugget hiring - and was awarded ANC FO the bid prior to nugget hiring) in ANC, at least until the excess!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:16 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cma2407's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Row well and live...
Posts: 494
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog
True dat. My buddy just came back from a 9 month LOA. Left as a 727SO and started training this week in the MD-11. He'll be the junior pre-nugget FO (he was the caboose for 4 months until nugget hiring - and was awarded ANC FO the bid prior to nugget hiring) in ANC, at least until the excess!
Another ANC house for Fred!
cma2407 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:52 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jagplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 777 Multi-tasker
Posts: 712
Default

Originally Posted by cma2407
Another ANC house for Fred!

wonder where he could find a real estate magnate to give him sound advice on the move???
jagplt is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:13 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BOYCAPTAIN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 609
Default

Originally Posted by cma2407
Another ANC house for Fred!
u guys are obviously not familiar with the home buying stipulations!
BOYCAPTAIN is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:14 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by BOYCAPTAIN
u guys are obviously not familiar with the home buying stipulations!
What makes you say that? What are they missing? Or just another drive by posting?
Deuce130 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:18 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BOYCAPTAIN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 609
Default

after the appraisals come on the comps there seems to be a stipulation on being able to sell the house in a certain time frame...90 days for example...then they look at comp homes that sold in that specific timeframe and base the appraisal on that...depending on where u live this could be awful in this market...probably comped with short sales and forclosures...it is not a good deal in this market....if u r going to use the third party program do some research on the stipulations....it is not spelled out in the contract!

Last edited by BOYCAPTAIN; 01-29-2009 at 10:51 AM.
BOYCAPTAIN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
JBuxted
Cargo
11
01-20-2009 12:21 PM
captexpress
Cargo
11
11-07-2008 02:56 PM
1800 RVR
Cargo
13
11-07-2008 07:38 AM
grant123
Cargo
14
09-18-2008 09:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices