FDX Feburary BLG
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: FedEx
Posts: 666
Not what I was saying no. What I meant is that we, us, the union, the MEC and NC will have to decide whether we will fight the charade and call the company's bluff or submit to their draconian measures.
We are saying that we are all about shared sacrifice. Sounds good. But will we fight to keep our pay at the contractual mins in the face of the company putting on the show of a potential furlough? I hope so.
It will be a difficult position for all of us.
FJ
We are saying that we are all about shared sacrifice. Sounds good. But will we fight to keep our pay at the contractual mins in the face of the company putting on the show of a potential furlough? I hope so.
It will be a difficult position for all of us.
FJ
#32
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 58
BTW, most outstanding grievances get forgiven by both sides upon ratification of a new CBA (happened with our current contract.) So even if we grieve a misinterpretation of Section 4 for back-pay, there's a good possibility it'll never get anywhere because of Contract 2010.
#34
BTW, most outstanding grievances get forgiven by both sides upon ratification of a new CBA (happened with our current contract.) So even if we grieve a misinterpretation of Section 4 for back-pay, there's a good possibility it'll never get anywhere because of Contract 2010.
#35
When others in this company seem to show no sense of urgency, the pilot group does. I am tired of being regarded with the same level of appreciation as the crew bus drivers.
I feel completely under-demitiated!!!!!!!!!!!
#36
What makes you think we'll actually have a contract before 2012 anyway? I'm hoping the grievance will not take 3 to 4 years, but you never know.
#37
Last time around, the company was stalling and we were ready for a contract. If the economy continues to struggle, the company will want a CBA sooner rather than later. Just my thoughts on the matter.
#38
BTW, most outstanding grievances get forgiven by both sides upon ratification of a new CBA (happened with our current contract.) So even if we grieve a misinterpretation of Section 4 for back-pay, there's a good possibility it'll never get anywhere because of Contract 2010.
The grievance process is used to take MINOR contract violations before a neutral arbitrator (like whether or not a pilot should have gotten catering on a certain flight, etc.....minor violations.) The arbitrator is not bound by any laws in making his/her decision (lots of leeway) - and the decision is binding on both parties. This process, as you say, can take years sometimes.
However.......for MAJOR contract violations, the grievance process is not used. The offended party files an actual lawsuit (vs. grievance) in Federal Court - could even ask for the judge to impose a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent further harm being inflicted while the lawsuit is litigated.
This court action goes before a Federal Judge (bound by law - not just an arbitrator) to decide who wins. And in these types of cases, monetary damages awarded are typically 3 times the amount of the original $$$ lost PLUS the original $$$ lost paid back to the offended party as well.
If this is all correct, I believe the Union should file in Federal Court the day the bidpacks for Feb are published (if not sooner.)
Guess we'll see in a couple of days.
Discuss........
#39
I don't know if this is true/correct or not, but what the heck, I'll throw it out there....(I'm not a lawyer - but I have stayed at Holiday Inn Expresses in the past)
The grievance process is used to take MINOR contract violations before a neutral arbitrator (like whether or not a pilot should have gotten catering on a certain flight, etc.....minor violations.) The arbitrator is not bound by any laws in making his/her decision (lots of leeway) - and the decision is binding on both parties. This process, as you say, can take years sometimes.
However.......for MAJOR contract violations, the grievance process is not used. The offended party files an actual lawsuit (vs. grievance) in Federal Court - could even ask for the judge to impose a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent further harm being inflicted while the lawsuit is litigated.
This court action goes before a Federal Judge (bound by law - not just an arbitrator) to decide who wins. And in these types of cases, monetary damages awarded are typically 3 times the amount of the original $$$ lost PLUS the original $$$ lost paid back to the offended party as well.
If this is all correct, I believe the Union should file in Federal Court the day the bidpacks for Feb are published (if not sooner.)
Guess we'll see in a couple of days.
Discuss........
The grievance process is used to take MINOR contract violations before a neutral arbitrator (like whether or not a pilot should have gotten catering on a certain flight, etc.....minor violations.) The arbitrator is not bound by any laws in making his/her decision (lots of leeway) - and the decision is binding on both parties. This process, as you say, can take years sometimes.
However.......for MAJOR contract violations, the grievance process is not used. The offended party files an actual lawsuit (vs. grievance) in Federal Court - could even ask for the judge to impose a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent further harm being inflicted while the lawsuit is litigated.
This court action goes before a Federal Judge (bound by law - not just an arbitrator) to decide who wins. And in these types of cases, monetary damages awarded are typically 3 times the amount of the original $$$ lost PLUS the original $$$ lost paid back to the offended party as well.
If this is all correct, I believe the Union should file in Federal Court the day the bidpacks for Feb are published (if not sooner.)
Guess we'll see in a couple of days.
Discuss........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post