Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX -- When will the MEC and NC grow a PAIR? >

FDX -- When will the MEC and NC grow a PAIR?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX -- When will the MEC and NC grow a PAIR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2009, 03:50 PM
  #41  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by Time Off
I called DT in Contract Enforcement yesterday. He "thinks" it might fall under 25.P, which says they can assign a trip to Management within 9 hours of showtime.

My opinion is that it falls under 25.O, which says a Draft trip has to be offered in reverse seniority.

If I'm right, wouldn't that mean that EVERY AIRBUS F/O with those dates off are entitled to compensation??
Looking at 25P, if the trip was within the 9 hours, I would guess the Company is right.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 01-03-2009, 05:47 PM
  #42  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Cool

Originally Posted by NoKoolAid
MEC and NC and Fellow Line Pilots,

The implementation of 48/60 by the company had BETTER get your attention in a HUGE WAY -- if you think this is no big deal, then you are officially christened an IDIOT!

We pay dues for a reason and it's now time to get this one right -- show some b@llz and make us proud -- for once in your collective tenures!

Here's what I want to see:

1. IMMEDIATE GRIEVANCE against the company on this issue -- inappropriate use of 48/60 section. Our collective sacrifice is far greater than ANY other employee group or even the CEO + all the executives! A lump sum settlement + interest after a grievance victory seems appropriate.

2. Stand up the SPC -- Strategic Preparedness Committee. We are getting seriously hosed here, so I think it's time to take it to the next level.

3. Informational Picketing -- Nationwide + Media

4. MEC and NC need to take a VERY AGGRESSIVE stance on this situation.

We had no problem during contract negotiations with picketing measures for contract IMPROVEMENTS.


This is NOT the time to roll over on your back and pi$$ yourself in light of the company's actions. That means all my fellow line pilots, MEC and NC. Don't be intimidated -- our company is making money. Not as much as they are used to seeing in the coffers, but still making money! The pax carriers were losing hundreds of millions/month before these kind of pay reductions and furloughs were enacted.

Show some BACKBONE and take care of the pilots you all represent!

WE ARE NOW IN A SERIOUS REVERSAL OF FORTUNES PEOPLE -- WAKE UP!

DO IT LEGAL -- DO IT RIGHT -- DO IT NOW!




I'm just getting started ... but I will take a break for now.

NKA
Well, I agree with you that something really terrible is happening but the truth is also that our volume declined by 40% during peek season and it is also true that we are considerably overmanned now. What are you proposing, to furlough people instead of reducing the BLG? That is a pretty idiotic and selfist idea. Get real for a moment, these are dire economic times and our product is a luxury and we are going to take a direct hit because companies that can't afford our product anymore are trimming expenses. These are times were we should hold together and reevaluate our situation, perhaps the frigant "Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act" should be reconsidered and age 60 reinstated, perhaps people in MEM should stop flying disputed pairings and volunteer period. I agree our union is not showing any balls, all they care about is for the status quo of those really senior guys over 55, we pay them way too much money ($17,000,000/year) for nothing, perhaps it is also time for a new, lean and mean all cargo union and to take ALPA to the frigant retirement home. I am senior enough and I am not in danger of being furlough but I would gladly give 25% of my salary away so nobody has to be furlough. Any questions?
airalaska is offline  
Old 01-03-2009, 06:03 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DiamondZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by airalaska
the truth is also that our volume declined by 40% during peek season
Where did you get this information?

I have yet to see anything official from the company.
DiamondZ is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 12:37 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
30 From Bottom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by DiamondZ
Where did you get this information?

I have yet to see anything official from the company.
I have friends who are engineers (the locals guys at the stations) who say we broke a record on the 22nd-23rd, but, overall, we were down around 16%-20% during peak.
Still surprising that Fed Ex has not put any numbers out yet???

And, for all the guys out there that are senior and willing to take a paycut for me and the rest of the guys at the bottom on the list...Thank you!!!
30 From Bottom is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 12:55 AM
  #45  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Default

Hi, I think most of us are willing to get a reduced BLG, if required so nobody has to be furlough. Its not an official quote from the company and I should have said so, its just my opinion based on the the loads I have been flying and questions I have ask throughout peak to ramp leads and managers. Not scientific but I'll bet I will be pretty close when the actual numbers are revealed.
airalaska is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 04:35 AM
  #46  
Trust but Verify!!
 
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD11 CRA
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by airalaska
Well, I agree with you that something really terrible is happening but the truth is also that our volume declined by 40% during peek season and it is also true that we are considerably overmanned now. What are you proposing, to furlough people instead of reducing the BLG? That is a pretty idiotic and selfist idea. Get real for a moment, these are dire economic times and our product is a luxury and we are going to take a direct hit because companies that can't afford our product anymore are trimming expenses. These are times were we should hold together and reevaluate our situation, perhaps the frigant "Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act" should be reconsidered and age 60 reinstated, perhaps people in MEM should stop flying disputed pairings and volunteer period. I agree our union is not showing any balls, all they care about is for the status quo of those really senior guys over 55, we pay them way too much money ($17,000,000/year) for nothing, perhaps it is also time for a new, lean and mean all cargo union and to take ALPA to the frigant retirement home. I am senior enough and I am not in danger of being furlough but I would gladly give 25% of my salary away so nobody has to be furlough. Any questions?
Yes. Here are a few..

Do you make it a habit of presenting your opinion as fact?

Have you called anyone in our union and asked for the figures they have?

How many bonuses have you been given when the company made record profits?

How much money has the company lost so far?

How much have they made the last 15 years?

Are you willing to take as pay cut every time in the future the company doesn't make as much as it wanted?

Have you even read JG's emails?

Do you have any clue how expensive it would be for this company to excess all pilots in the right positions to furlough?

Do you have any idea how long they would have to be out to break even on that mark?

If things are so bad that we all need to take a pay cut that far exceeds any other group in this company, why has this company ignored our offers of help with furlough mitigation strategies this last year?

That's enough for now but I have plenty of more questions for you when you finish these..

Thanks for the offer. Enquiring minds want to know!

I think most of us are more than wiling to share the pain to prevent a furlough. Are you willing to pay the price for management mistakes though? OOPS..that was meant for the next round of questions..

BTW..I am as upset about Age 60 and Retro as you and how it is now being used against us by the company to justify a pay cut. I even warned DW and crew of just such a possible scenario after his message telling us he was going against this groups wishes to get the over 60's back in the front seat. That and a quarter will get us all a hot cup of Jack Squat though and if we don't play this right we will all be living in a van down by the river

YouTube - Matt Foley: The Ultimate Tribute

Right now though we really do all need to stick together and make sure the contract is followed to it's original intent. I am quite positive the intent was not to allow the company to drop the word furlough and take away 30% of our pay. If the company really wants our help as far as I know the furlough mitigation offers are still on the table. Maybe you could ask your Rep when you call..
FreightDawgyDog is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 08:23 AM
  #47  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 8
Default

i guess there is no world wide recession.

cnbc,wallstreet j. gdp numbers from china etc......
one big lie from the co. to take advantage of fdx pilots
piper is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 09:00 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tractor Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: MD11
Posts: 227
Default

Having been in the passenger business until furloughed and hired here at FDX, I've noticed a trend in management. When doom and gloom is preached, management will go for the low hanging fruit....i.e. the "over paid pilots" and any provision in their contract they can get away with destroying. Pick any legacy carrier and you will see the result. The difference is that those carriers were either in bankruptcy or on the brink, loosing billions before they came after the unions. We make millions in profit every quarter. We are over manned. The company will furlough when they think it is in the company's best interest. We shouldn't give an inch until the bankruptcy judge orders us to. I will be one of the first to go if the furlough happens, but I don't believe they have any intention of doing so. Which is why the reduced BLG is pure BS, smoke and mirrors.

Buddy of mine is a FDX driver and said they were swamped on overloaded from the 22nd thru the 27th. The engineers didn't see it coming. Said it started with not enough lift out of Memphis. Deafening silence about the Christmas loads.

"you hired us, you pay us" and "Full pay to the Last day"

Maybe now FDX pilots will stop drinking the coolaide.
Tractor Bob is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 09:14 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 356
Default

Ask O or any manager how much extra airlift Amazon needed ( the most parcels ever)...We will never hear peak numbers if it was bad it would be front page when you log in....

Last edited by HDawg; 01-04-2009 at 09:34 AM.
HDawg is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 09:37 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bulletboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by piper
i guess there is no world wide recession.

cnbc,wallstreet j. gdp numbers from china etc......
one big lie from the co. to take advantage of fdx pilots
I don't think this is the germane to the topic........

I think it is irresponsible for the company to create an atmosphere where seniority and aircraft will determine how much of a "sacrifice" you have to make.

I think it is irresponsible for the company to unilaterally interpret a section of the contract that will knowingly be grieved.

Fed Ex express carries the water for the FDX family.....how many "charges" has express taken from other FDX corp company's? Should I have to pay because someone doesn't want to make copies anymore?

The company likes class warfare in the pilot ranks. They love putting the lose, lose decisions on the pilot's and union's back.

Maybe the title of this thread should be "When will the company Do the right thing?"
Bulletboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices