Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX -- Crossroads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2009, 11:15 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

This juat does not make sense, could they really want some kind of LOA and this is just appling pressure?
The amount of time between the closure of the 777 bid and the proposed excesses does seem curious for a company that claims it is in dire need of drastic measures. They didn't get anywhere with ALPA all this time, so it seems like they want some time to try and negotiate directly with us under implied threat.

If they intend to furlough, they are going to do it anyway and no LOA is going to stop that. ALPA's furlough mitigation proposal did not include final language, but from what I saw of the synopsis I didn't get the sense that there was any kind of act of war/terrorism/natural disaster/Martian attack or Force Majeure clause attached to the proposed no-furlough language. No furlough clauses are tough to enforce as is, without any of that stuff they would likely drive a big ol' Force Manure truck right through that provision.

Imo any future proposed LOA on manning issues, must include expansion/enhancements to 4.a.2.b. Things like: mandatory sharing of the proprietary manning data with ALPA preferably monthly, clarification of the meaning of impending furlough, a mechanism to drive a snap back to the standard contract language, force majeure protection, and an expedited grievance process on anything in the entire contract having to do with RIF(including scope).
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 11:50 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Originally Posted by onetime
DC10 guys/gals with training as far out as late summer are going straight to 48/60 if you read between the lines from PC.

25 C 8.
If no bid period package is published for a crew position due to the absence of known and confirmed flying in such crew position, pilots holding such crew position shall not be awarded lines for the bid period and shall be paid the average scheduled BLG for regular lines, system-wide.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 11:55 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Originally Posted by onetime
Us, not me, us.

Quick question, I'm a WB F/O, mid 30s, if two years ago I just woke up one morning and wanted to move to 727 S/O for whatever reason, would I have been allowed to do that without a bid? Anyway all that is beside the point as the picture is much bigger than that. Good luck to all, but as I said up top WE do have a decision to make. Back to football.
24 E 6.

A pilot who has a legal restriction that prohibits him from flying in his current crew status shall be accommodated in another crew status, if any, from which he is not legally restricted consistent with his seniority and standing bid.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:02 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
First, none of those guys chose to go to the back seat. The law at the time forced them too. Still does at 65.

.

Everyone one of "those guys" had the option to retire, so everyone of "those guys" chose to go to the backseat. Just as people may choose to go to the back seat at 65, if it's still available.

And everyone of "those guys" was entitled to do exactly what they did.


And, I do know of at least one single dad who downbid from widebody Capt to widebody FO without a vacancy posting. So, in at least some situations, the company does do a good job of taking care of folks. Bereavement abscences is another good example of something the company does right.

so mgt not 100% $%^&*%^, maybe only 95% :-) definitely over 50%
kronan is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:15 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyByNyte's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 108
Cool

Yup..."those guys" are entitled to shoot themselves in the foot too if they want. Plus that crowd is virtually littered with CHEAP A$$ non-members, just like the 777. To allow the contract language to be interpreted in such a way as protect them and allow them to steal seats after 60, with no open bid was a mistake. This comment applies to those that turned and kept plumbing before the law changed...those after are a different story.

--And remember, friends don't let friends fly themselves to the grave.
FlyByNyte is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:27 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
onetime's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777 F/O
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
25 C 8.
If no bid period package is published for a crew position due to the absence of known and confirmed flying in such crew position, pilots holding such crew position shall not be awarded lines for the bid period and shall be paid the average scheduled BLG for regular lines, system-wide.
I have no crystal ball, but one or two lines and one airplane will constitute a bidpack. That can be a charter or Austin O/Bs. Company pays 48/60 to that group. We greive it, long process. Next CBA has a one pager in the back that says all outstanding greivances will be withdrawn. Don't be surprised.
onetime is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:36 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Unknown Rider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by BigWatchPilot
You are kidding right? With the companies interpretation the min BLG is 48/60 hrs. We can be seasonal employees like ski lift operators and lifeguards. They can drop the BLG anytime they want, in whatever seat they want, for as long as they want. I don't see how 68/84 could be a minimum anymore with their version of our contract.

As PC stated in the FCIF, "Furlough, remains a possibility" There is no immanent furlough that the company is attempting to avoid or delay. I no George Clooney but this does not sound legal to me for what their intent is.

BWP...out

What's this "WE" stuff? Didn't we already establish you're not a FedEx pilot. Go back to your Xbox and leave this stuff to the adults.
Unknown Rider is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:44 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Are you just making shiip up off the top of your head? Settle down until we see something happen. My point is know your contract before spewing it out from something you heard from Omar the tent maker. And the other thing is that MBPG does not equal BLG. Again, read the little book that they sent us, and talk facts, not daydreams.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:51 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
onetime's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777 F/O
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
Are you just making shiip up off the top of your head? Settle down until we see something happen. My point is know your contract before spewing it out from something you heard from Omar the tent maker. And the other thing is that MBPG does not equal BLG. Again, read the little book that they sent us, and talk facts, not daydreams.
I knew about 25C8 and 24E6 long before you cut and pasted them above. Comments like Omar the tent maker tell us a lot about where you are coming from. You're right, let's wait and see.
onetime is offline  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:54 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

If you knew about it, why post misinformation? Just to stir the pot?

And by the way, I'm 49 yrs old, 11yrs at the company, and will be soon flying in the rt seat again. So I feel your pain.

I guess intead of Omar I could have used that Faqqot that used to DJ on MTV, if that's what you mean.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
1800 RVR
Cargo
13
11-07-2008 07:38 AM
grant123
Cargo
14
09-18-2008 09:31 AM
NZNV
Cargo
11
08-07-2008 11:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices