Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Visual Separation between departures >

Visual Separation between departures

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Visual Separation between departures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2008, 05:14 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by Beertini
You are scaring me Fatty...breaking out the 7110.65.

Next thing you know we will start doing approach TERPS criteria reviews.

Beertini
it was as easy as google.com

-Fatty
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 11-17-2008, 08:13 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by MEM_ATC
The Local Controller asked the Heavy if he still had the B727 in sight in an effort to apply Visual Separation, and the Heavy driver responded with "I refuse to accept or provide visual separation" (paraphrased).
The guy that brought up the psychological term 'anal retentive' wins the prize.

WHAT a bunch of weenies!

'ATC' is just trying to help you dorks out -and improve your employer's bottom line! IE: lower fuel burn . .stock price . . dividends . .. fiscal soundness.

Some of you guys have been watching too much Boston Legal. . . or imagine you are lawyers. Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here. Pitiful !!

I thought this was a 'team effort' here? Too much 'CYA' going on for an old timer. Accept the damn clearance -and if you 'lose' him -due to your own weaknesses . .due to your own pizz poor airman ship . . call it out. . . and get a vector out of the situation.
W0XOFF is offline  
Old 11-17-2008, 11:33 PM
  #43  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by W0XOFF

... 'anal retentive' wins the prize.

WHAT a bunch of weenies!

'ATC' is just trying to help you dorks out - ...

Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here. Pitiful !!

Too much 'CYA' going on ...

if you 'lose' him -due to your own weaknesses . .due to your own pizz poor airman ship . . call it out. . .

Whatever you say, cowgirl.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 02:42 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,238
Default

Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here. Pitiful !!

Y'all ever hear the famous last words of Will Rogers?

"Yeah, Wiley, he's a great pilot...."
Huck is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 05:16 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by W0XOFF
...Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here...
You mean, like the "back in the Falcon" guys?
Busboy is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:02 AM
  #46  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by W0XOFF
The guy that brought up the psychological term 'anal retentive' wins the prize.

WHAT a bunch of weenies!

'ATC' is just trying to help you dorks out -and improve your employer's bottom line! IE: lower fuel burn . .stock price . . dividends . .. fiscal soundness.

Some of you guys have been watching too much Boston Legal. . . or imagine you are lawyers. Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here. Pitiful !!

I thought this was a 'team effort' here? Too much 'CYA' going on for an old timer. Accept the damn clearance -and if you 'lose' him -due to your own weaknesses . .due to your own pizz poor airman ship . . call it out. . . and get a vector out of the situation.
At least we'll accept a transponder code that includes "666" in the number!

Oh yea, and when you're pulling back the throttles to go slow into SAN (hmm, wonder why anyone would do that? ), its hard to over take anyone!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:39 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
990Convair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Heavily Involved
Posts: 473
Default

Originally Posted by W0XOFF
The guy that brought up the psychological term 'anal retentive' wins the prize.

WHAT a bunch of weenies!

'ATC' is just trying to help you dorks out -and improve your employer's bottom line! IE: lower fuel burn . .stock price . . dividends . .. fiscal soundness.

Some of you guys have been watching too much Boston Legal. . . or imagine you are lawyers. Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here. Pitiful !!

I thought this was a 'team effort' here? Too much 'CYA' going on for an old timer. Accept the damn clearance -and if you 'lose' him -due to your own weaknesses . .due to your own pizz poor airman ship . . call it out. . . and get a vector out of the situation.
Amen Brother!!!
990Convair is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 07:49 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
990Convair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Heavily Involved
Posts: 473
Default

Originally Posted by W0XOFF
The guy that brought up the psychological term 'anal retentive' wins the prize.

WHAT a bunch of weenies!


Some of you guys have been watching too much Boston Legal. . . or imagine you are lawyers. Think about what the 'can do' pioneers of aviation would be thinking of your limp dick responses here. Pitiful !!

I thought this was a 'team effort' here? Too much 'CYA' going on for an old timer. Accept the damn clearance -and if you 'lose' him -due to your own weaknesses . .due to your own pizz poor airman ship . . call it out. . . and get a vector out of the situation.
Great example of my point is the latest MD-FSR submitted for, and I kid you not, a failed cargo door test! After pushback, or so the lecture goes, they get a failed cargo door test, do the manual test, it fails then they block back in. Wow, thanks for the report. I feel SOOO much safer! Perhaps we should nominate the Capt for the daedalion award. Humorous to me that somebody would actually take the time to write a missive about such an inconsequential event, one that doesn't even fall under the reasons to submit the report in the first place.

"AR" all the way!
990Convair is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 09:18 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

I was watching 4 T-45s take off today from El Centro and I was thinking about this 'visual separation' thread and wondering if there would be such a big discussion in their ready room. Reading this thread has certainly given me a new perspective on the whole thing. I've never put that much thought into it.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 03:49 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,238
Default

I flew down to Florida once on the MD-10. On the return leg, we got out to the jet and the wing anti-ice was deferred. MEL said that you have to remain clear of icing conditions.

The captain said, no problem - he had printed out the satellite picture of the southeast, and if we just aviated a little west of our filed route we'd be fine.

I asked him if he'd realized what we were signing up for - maintaining VFR at night at Mach .82. Hitting clouds and then getting out of them is not "remaining clear" of icing conditions.

You guys with the eagle eyes and the fighter reflexes are all studs and all, but the FAA can ruin your whole day - I've seen it many times, and I'd say over 50% of the time the pilot is trying to do the company a favor.

Consistently spotting the right 727 at night with no logo lights from ~3 miles away while flying a two-man airliner through the takeoff profile... you guys are Yeager, man.....
Huck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices