Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Hey, how about that HUGE FDX bid??!! >

Hey, how about that HUGE FDX bid??!!

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Hey, how about that HUGE FDX bid??!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2006, 08:38 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain_drew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: FredEx Captain-Retired
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
Why give up what little leverage we have? We turned down the first one, they wanted it bad enough to come back for another try, why not say "no LOA, but we can include it in the TA"?

Remember the company's response the our postal demands? They laughed in our face! Again, I say, why should we do them any favors?
Nightflyer,

If I had a vote, I would be lined up in your corner.

Nothing. . nada. .zero. . zip . .zilch. . UNTIL they wrap it up and incorporate it into an acceptable TA. You give them the LOA now . .what the heck is their motivation to press on with a TA?

I hope you guys are also concentrating on retirement issues. Believe it or not . . it is coming up . .fast . . for everyone. With luck, you will live many more years in retirement than you did working for a living.
captain_drew is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 08:51 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
It basically says the new guys going to ANC will get a #2 move package, must remain 18 months going up, or 3 years for a round trip move.
I am sure this will benefit guys who want to move to ANC, but I don't think it will help the guys already there.
My point remains the same. The company wants this, we want a TA. Why should we help them, when they won't help us? Unless the union knows something they are not telling about the TA, I think I'll pass on the LOA.
We have been wanting a move package to ANC for as long as I can remember. Remember the company only wanted this for 1 bid which we wisely turned down. This LOA makes it a permanent deal.

Pilots will get full paid move up back as long as they remain activated in ANC for 36 months and live there for a minimum of 18 months. Every Pilot currently up there will rate a move to the lower 48 when they bid out(assuming they have be activated in ANC for 36 months and have lived there 18 months)

Retiring Pilots will get a paid move to there Sunbelt homes when they retire.
(Costs not to exceed the value of an ANC to MEM move)

Where is the real downside?
I wish there was a crash pad move and I wish there was a 1 month of base pay move allowance.

Again my question to you is............if the company put out a mega bid Today with most of the vacancies in ANC, do you really think they wouldn't get filled? and there would be NO move benefits.

My opinion on this LOA is we would be getting something and give up nothing. We have NO move benefits to ANC currently.

Just curious, what is the downside.............Yeah I know we want a TA now but this would be a permanent benefit received today.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:31 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,395
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
We have been wanting a move package to ANC for as long as I can remember. Remember the company only wanted this for 1 bid which we wisely turned down. This LOA makes it a permanent deal.

Just curious, what is the downside.............Yeah I know we want a TA now but this would be a permanent benefit received today.
Unless I am wrong, which is possible, the downside is that the LOA is attached to the current contract, with no guarantee of being in the final TA.

So here's how it works...

1) LOA is passed.

2) Company puts out ANC bid and fills all vacancies.

3) Back to the table for the TA.

4) Company says, "we will let the guys in the bid and the current guys in ANC get a move package, but we don't want it as a permanent benefit in the new TA". Or, "you can have this in the TA, but what will you give up for it?". If you think I am crazy, check the cost of your copays, when you were promised by the company and the union that "health care costs would remain constant for the length of the contract." Fool me once, shame on you...you know how the rest of it goes. Trust but verify.

Call me cynical, I call it realistic. Did we learn nothing last time around?

By the way, Redeye, are you ANC based? That would tell me a lot about your reasoning behind your position!

Seriously, I want the ANC guys to get a move. If I could get my wife to live up there, I'd do it in a heartbeat. But I want it as part of a TA, not as an LOA. Just my opinion, and you are certainly entitled to yours.
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:33 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,395
Default

Originally Posted by captain_drew
Nightflyer,

If I had a vote, I would be lined up in your corner.

Nothing. . nada. .zero. . zip . .zilch. . UNTIL they wrap it up and incorporate it into an acceptable TA. You give them the LOA now . .what the heck is their motivation to press on with a TA?

I hope you guys are also concentrating on retirement issues. Believe it or not . . it is coming up . .fast . . for everyone. With luck, you will live many more years in retirement than you did working for a living.
Thanks for your support, Captain Drew, and I wish you many happy years of retirement on Fred's nickel!!!
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:47 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain_drew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: FredEx Captain-Retired
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
Thanks for your support, Captain Drew, and I wish you many happy years of retirement on Fred's nickel!!!

I have been thinking that living to 116 (and still riding a Harley) would be the best revenge for all the hose-jobbing and back stabbing by Fred. Of course, his kids being felons is a good start
captain_drew is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:51 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
Unless I am wrong, which is possible, the downside is that the LOA is attached to the current contract, with no guarantee of being in the final TA.

So here's how it works...

1) LOA is passed.

2) Company puts out ANC bid and fills all vacancies.

3) Back to the table for the TA.

4) Company says, "we will let the guys in the bid and the current guys in ANC get a move package, but we don't want it as a permanent benefit in the new TA". Or, "you can have this in the TA, but what will you give up for it?". If you think I am crazy, check the cost of your copays, when you were promised by the company and the union that "health care costs would remain constant for the length of the contract." Fool me once, shame on you...you know how the rest of it goes. Trust but verify.

Call me cynical, I call it realistic. Did we learn nothing last time around?

By the way, Redeye, are you ANC based? That would tell me a lot about your reasoning behind your position!

Seriously, I want the ANC guys to get a move. If I could get my wife to live up there, I'd do it in a heartbeat. But I want it as part of a TA, not as an LOA. Just my opinion, and you are certainly entitled to yours.
Actually I am MEM based.

Niteflyer if this LOA is passed it is permanent until we get a new contract....................

Why not vote yes for this LOA (based on its merit if you think it is a gain)

I would hope that the Negotoiating committee would not send us a TA that does not have this incorporated in.......................but if the TA that we will eventually vote on does not have this incorporated........you will have the option of voting no then.........................

I am not trying to change your mind................MY point is that if it is a good thing for the Pilots what do you have to lose?

I say it again..........If the company put out a mega bid tomorrow with 100 CPT/ 140 FO vacancies to ANC do you really think they would go unfilled?
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 11:51 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Completely Apolitical Nonsensical Slogan that has nothing to do with politics in the slightest....
Posts: 160
Default

I was kinda hoping that newhires would end up going...

But that's just me..

TSD
Twiceskunkeddog is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 12:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Twiceskunkeddog
I was kinda hoping that newhires would end up going...
But that's just me..
TSD
Why would you want newhires in the MD?
Nothing against newhires and I don't blame them for bidding the highest paying equipment they can hold.

I am curious as to your reasoning (seniority aside)......................

hopefully atleast they will get a move package up there if they do.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 02:25 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ranger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD-11/10 Captain
Posts: 533
Default

We can stop wondering why the LOA wasn't accepted. The union just put out a letter stating that we have reached tentative agreement on a LOA regarding ANC moves. Next comes the membership vote on acceptance/rejection. I'll vote the way that the negotiating committee recommends.

I'm up to six (6) draft calls since Friday evening. Apparently the LAX crews aren't too inclined to give up their days off. Me included.

"The only draft that I'll accept comes in a tall, frosty glass." I don't know who said it originally but it's my battle cry now.
Ranger is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 03:59 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
To Nightflyer
Whoa big Fella...............This LOA was negotiated by YOUR negotiating committee. While I haven't seen the actual language it sounds like it is a move forward. We do not currently have a relocation package to ANC.......................Now we might (assuming it passes) and that is benefit ( A Good One) we currently do not have.

Before you start pounding your chest..........Give YOUR negotiating committee the benefit of the doubt. Read the LOA when it is sent to you before you just say NO.

I am as Frustrated with MGT concerning negotiations as you are.
But voting NO just to make a statement when this LOA was negotiated by YOUR NC (especially if they endorse it)........will send a signal to MGT of "No confidence" in ALPA's negotiating committee.

Read it,look at the merits of it..........and if you truely don't think it is a net gain in a benefit........then by all means vote your conscience. Until then.......take a breath and count to ten.

Fraternally
Dito "don't look a gift horse in the mouth" The negotiating committee claims it did not cost anything to us...
FR8Hauler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-28-2006 09:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices