Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
777 Pay= Airbus Pay     FDX >

777 Pay= Airbus Pay FDX

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

777 Pay= Airbus Pay FDX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2008, 08:28 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by kronan
Missing the sim you are going to have to do pre-trip to Shanghai for currency, so, it will be a 5 or 6 day trip to Shanghai for 33 hours
Hmm? You expect 3&3 before every trip? Twice, three times a month. In any case that is a F/O problem. Captains should never have to go to the sim to stay current. Look at the bright side, you may be senior enough to fly it if the rate is the same as the MD11/A300.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:32 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

The tiered pay scale by aircraft type is a tradition. It is supposed to ensure the most senior maintain a pay premium over the less senior. A reward for years of service, I guess.

At FDX, it's a concept closely related to the protection of carryover.

Tradition is strong in the Navy, I mean FDX.
Gunter is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:34 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter
Hmm? You expect 3&3 before every trip? Twice, three times a month. In any case that is a F/O problem. Captains should never have to go to the sim to stay current.
You need to learn what the plan is for the 777. Sim before fly.
Gunter is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:38 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: C
Posts: 35
Default

It wasn’t that long ago that there was talk about increasing the MD-11 rates to get the more senior pilots to bid it.
Buzzard is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:42 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 530
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
So a 777 pilot should be compansated the same as an RJ pilot?
IF UPS wants to start flying RJs w/ cargo doors (think BAE 146s in Europe....) That's fine. Pay me the same to fly them. Don't subcontract them or buy the little company that flies them if/when it violates Scope. Don't make any mistakes the legacy airlines made. Any way you spell it, it's a loaded question so I give you a loaded reply.
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:43 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
Let me guess.

You are a senior FO or junior CA. Longevity around 7-11 years. Probably hired much younger than the retired military crowd. Sound about right?
Not only wrong but, dead wrong.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:53 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit
IF UPS wants to start flying RJs w/ cargo doors (think BAE 146s in Europe....) That's fine. Pay me the same to fly them. Don't subcontract them or buy the little company that flies them if/when it violates Scope. Don't make any mistakes the legacy airlines made. Any way you spell it, it's a loaded question so I give you a loaded reply.
They won't use UPS pilots to fly that size aircraft, they will subcontract the same way they do with the feeders in ONT, SAT, EWR, etc..
The mistake the majors made was trying to get the small airplane pay to the large airplane pay disregarding the revenue production.
This started when the DC-9 grew from the -10 to the -50 and the pilots wanted the same pay .

You have a differential pay structure to allow the smaller airplane to remain in the fleet so that a pilot has the opportunity to get on the ladder, the group has an array of choices. The expansion of the Commuter(now called regional) was a response to costs
757upspilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:54 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
Not only wrong but, dead wrong.
o.k.

Give us some background. What is your perspective? FO or CA? That colors your opinions.

The senior bubbas often work to protect or enhance their pay at the expense of the junior bubbas. Frankly, I am amazed the IPA negotiated such a junior member friendly contract. I've only heard irritation from the senior guys who feel THEIR money is being given to the juniority.

Last edited by Gunter; 09-27-2008 at 09:05 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:03 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
o.k.

Give us some background. What is your perspective. FO or CA? That colors your opinions.

The senior bubbas always want to protect or enhance their pay at the expense of the junior bubbas. Frankly, I am amazed the IPA negotiated such a junior member friendly contract. I've only heard irritation from the senior guys who feel THEIR money is being given to the juniority.
What colors my perspective is how long you are on top pay opposed to any pay prior to the top.

From what you have posted you are a retired mil coming to the airlines business and willing to accept less pay for the pilots who have spent a career so that you can sit in back and collect your retirement and a pay check.

The IPA was disfunctional , at the EB level, as per the mediator and our Ex Marine Corp General President. The contract passed with a percentage in the 56% range.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:09 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
What colors my perspective is how long you are on top pay opposed to any pay prior to the top.

The IPA was disfunctional , at the EB level, as per the mediator and our Ex Marine Corp General President. The contract passed with a percentage in the 56% range.
There is a difference if you are hired in your late 20's vs. 40 or above.

I don't know what the right answer is, but the contract you guys got is friendlier toward those hired older than the past contract. I see benefits to both. In an environment with slow or non-existent upgrades, counting on pay increases due to relative seniority will not bring home the bacon over the course of a career like it used to.

And, no, I'm not collecting a retirement check.
Gunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices