Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Expect FO SIBA soon in HKG... >

FDX - Expect FO SIBA soon in HKG...

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Expect FO SIBA soon in HKG...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2008, 01:27 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by mrvmo
Just curious........what does SIBA stand for?
Anyplace else - Leverage
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 01:43 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PastV1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 11 Capt
Posts: 509
Default

You can't dh to/from mem/HKG in a single duty period. So there is 2 days each way on the commute. Should be interesting!
PastV1 is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 02:25 PM
  #13  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by PastV1
You can't dh to/from mem/HKG in a single duty period. So there is 2 days each way on the commute. Should be interesting!
We have an October trip that starts with a trip to HNL, then DHs to SFO and operates to NRT to start the Asia bag drag. So.......maybe they start you out with a SFO, OAK or LAX trip, lay you over then DH you to HKG. You need to think like the enemy and ...the sodomizer is our enemy!
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 02:34 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by PastV1
You can't dh to/from mem/HKG in a single duty period. So there is 2 days each way on the commute. Should be interesting!

Unless DW cuts a deal. After all it is just F/Os, he could decide company jumpseats are OK or at least authorize coach.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 02:38 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Micro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Anyplace else - Leverage
Ahhhh!!!!! But we were told we have none. OK maybe a little. Ok maybe a little more. I guess the few of us here (the fringe) were right after all. I hope the other 68% are starting to realize they were sold a POS.
Micro is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 03:20 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
angry tanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 390
Default

So who gets the better trips, the assigned domiciled FO's or the SIBA FO's? What does the Union have to say about any of this?
angry tanker is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 03:41 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by angry tanker
So who gets the better trips, the assigned domiciled FO's or the SIBA FO's? What does the Union have to say about any of this?

That is easy, the SIBA trips will be the ones that pack the most duty periods into the least days.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 03:52 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFW_MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
Default vindication

Originally Posted by Micro
I guess the few of us here (the fringe) were right after all. I hope the other 68% are starting to realize they were sold a POS.
just making sure I understand what you're saying......who was right that is.......

was it you guys on "the fringe" who, last week, were counting the days to non-vol STVs?

or, was it the guys (me) that said "believe the company when they say there will be no non-vol STVs to fill the vacancies?"

you 32%-ers got this all WIRED!! not.

so......to recap.......who was right about STV and/or SIBA again? the paranoid about non-vol STV 32%-ers on "the fringe"? uh, yeah....not.

and while we're at it, why is everyone suggesting that SIBA would go senior and voluntary STV wouldn't? can someone 'splain that one to me? isn't SIBA usually 3 months also (maybe not, we don't have it in ANC, so I don't know for sure)?

seems to me that SIBA must be a better deal ($$$) for the company than STV or they'd be offering voluntary STV instead of SIBA - even with the positioning/depositioning deadheads. or, heck, for that matter, just non-vol the junior suckers to STV instead........things that make you go hmmmmmmmm?

yeah.....you guys were "right".........
AFW_MD11 is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 03:59 PM
  #19  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Unless DW cuts a deal. After all it is just F/Os, he could decide company jumpseats are OK or at least authorize coach.
Fortunately, Webb only has that ability under the FDA LOA. SIBA is not included in that POS setup. STV is. Good we gave up the leverage of SIBA for STV! Knuckleheads!! Well, 68% of us, anyway.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 04:00 PM
  #20  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by angry tanker
So who gets the better trips, the assigned domiciled FO's or the SIBA FO's? What does the Union have to say about any of this?
There is nothing to say. Schedulers can do what they want.
iarapilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 06:40 PM
grant123
Cargo
14
09-18-2008 10:31 AM
viperdriver
Cargo
24
08-18-2008 01:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices