FDX Fuel Sense "My History"
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Don't know if this has been brought up before, but someone mentioned diverts.
If you divert (because, say, we are landing south at The planet and ATC is behind the power curve) that does NOT count against the Fuel Sense numbers.
They do not take penalties when they tweak the fuel too tightly and we end up bailing out to maintain a margin of safety.
Just food for thought when looking at your next FP/R.
If you divert (because, say, we are landing south at The planet and ATC is behind the power curve) that does NOT count against the Fuel Sense numbers.
They do not take penalties when they tweak the fuel too tightly and we end up bailing out to maintain a margin of safety.
Just food for thought when looking at your next FP/R.
So, what you're saying is the company doesn't really care if we divert...as long as it's saving them fuel?
OK then...
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
You are taking the entirely wrong perspective on all of this.
Fly slower on the 'almost' . .or 'close to' 8 hour block time domestic flights . . which we all know are based upon the 'historic' .84, .85, .86 -'balls to the wall' -'can do', 'Absolutely, Positively' spirit here.
Let's see how long it takes the bean counters to figure out if replacing several '8 in 24' crews is cheaper than the fuel it takes to 'get the boxes where they need to be in the time alloted.
Fly slower on the 'almost' . .or 'close to' 8 hour block time domestic flights . . which we all know are based upon the 'historic' .84, .85, .86 -'balls to the wall' -'can do', 'Absolutely, Positively' spirit here.
Let's see how long it takes the bean counters to figure out if replacing several '8 in 24' crews is cheaper than the fuel it takes to 'get the boxes where they need to be in the time alloted.
However, I do see an opportunity for a win-win situation. Generally flying slower saves gas, so when you take off 10 minutes early on a 8+ hour flight why not slow down. The company will save lots of money on gas and we get a little more money.
I'm surprised this hasn't come out as an official message yet.
I have no problem with the fuel sense program, we're all in this together to make money and if it helps I'm all for it, within the limits of safety. I do however, expect the union to bring this up during the next contract negotiations.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
So, what you're saying is the company doesn't really care if we divert...as long as it's saving them fuel?
so when you take off 10 minutes early on a 8+ hour flight why not slow down. The company will save lots of money on gas and we get a little more money.
I'm surprised this hasn't come out as an official message yet.
I'm surprised this hasn't come out as an official message yet.
#25
"They" are the fuel sense bean-counters. Fuel savings from the Fuel Sense initiative goes into the positive column; diverts (and all that wasted fuel) do not count against these numbers.
#26
If you divert (because, say, we are landing south at The planet and ATC is behind the power curve) that does NOT count against the Fuel Sense numbers.
They do not take penalties when they tweak the fuel too tightly and we end up bailing out to maintain a margin of safety.
They do not take penalties when they tweak the fuel too tightly and we end up bailing out to maintain a margin of safety.
So who's in charge of connecting all the dots anyway??
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Ahhh yes. Of course, the "fuel sense bean counters". Is there a VP of fuel sense bean counter? How would one contact these individuals?
You guys are smokin some pretty good crack if you think this compnay doesn't care if even 1 airplane diverts due to lack of fuel reserves. Or for any reason, for that matter. I guarantee you that someone must answer for that.
Maybe, its the "low fuel divert bean counters".
You guys are smokin some pretty good crack if you think this compnay doesn't care if even 1 airplane diverts due to lack of fuel reserves. Or for any reason, for that matter. I guarantee you that someone must answer for that.
Maybe, its the "low fuel divert bean counters".
#28
I'm not smoking anything. I'm just relaying what was said in recurrent when someone asked about where diverts go in the big Fuel Sense scheme of things.
I sure hope that someone somewhere connects the dots, but the answer that day did not inspire confidence.
I sure hope that someone somewhere connects the dots, but the answer that day did not inspire confidence.
#29
Not that there is enough chest beating around the FedEx property I really don't care about my fuel sense history.
Just do your job. Do it by the book or when necessary use common sense.
If the history helps the n/c (who work for us, YOU READING THIS GUYS?) then good. If cutting fuel is gonna compromise safety....I'm not with it.
Everyone is really gonna be thrilled when the alternates are removed.
Rant mode is now disabled.
Just do your job. Do it by the book or when necessary use common sense.
If the history helps the n/c (who work for us, YOU READING THIS GUYS?) then good. If cutting fuel is gonna compromise safety....I'm not with it.
Everyone is really gonna be thrilled when the alternates are removed.
Rant mode is now disabled.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Atreyu
Regional
16
08-11-2008 11:10 AM