Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX Fuel Sense "My History" >

FDX Fuel Sense "My History"

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Fuel Sense "My History"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2008, 07:22 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by pilot141
Don't know if this has been brought up before, but someone mentioned diverts.

If you divert (because, say, we are landing south at The planet and ATC is behind the power curve) that does NOT count against the Fuel Sense numbers.

They do not take penalties when they tweak the fuel too tightly and we end up bailing out to maintain a margin of safety.

Just food for thought when looking at your next FP/R.
Who are "they"?

So, what you're saying is the company doesn't really care if we divert...as long as it's saving them fuel?

OK then...
Busboy is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 08:30 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Default

You are taking the entirely wrong perspective on all of this.

Fly slower on the 'almost' . .or 'close to' 8 hour block time domestic flights . . which we all know are based upon the 'historic' .84, .85, .86 -'balls to the wall' -'can do', 'Absolutely, Positively' spirit here.

Let's see how long it takes the bean counters to figure out if replacing several '8 in 24' crews is cheaper than the fuel it takes to 'get the boxes where they need to be in the time alloted.
Sorry, but I disagree. At this point in time I see no need to hurt the company. I fly fast when necessary to get the job done.

However, I do see an opportunity for a win-win situation. Generally flying slower saves gas, so when you take off 10 minutes early on a 8+ hour flight why not slow down. The company will save lots of money on gas and we get a little more money.

I'm surprised this hasn't come out as an official message yet.

I have no problem with the fuel sense program, we're all in this together to make money and if it helps I'm all for it, within the limits of safety. I do however, expect the union to bring this up during the next contract negotiations.
MD10PLT is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 09:55 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

So, what you're saying is the company doesn't really care if we divert...as long as it's saving them fuel?
To a degree, that's probably true. While the face of this stuff is pilots and dispatchers both on the line and in management, at the end of the day it comes down to bean counters. The way these types thinks is often quite contrary to the way most of us think, and there is likely an acceptable divert number relative to the fuel savings gained. That's likely not going to be admitted to us, because there is no gain in doing so.

so when you take off 10 minutes early on a 8+ hour flight why not slow down. The company will save lots of money on gas and we get a little more money.

I'm surprised this hasn't come out as an official message yet.
It is curious that they didn't discover this when they did their reviews of how other airlines operate. Most of them have some sort of 'guideline matrix' on how to best handle these situations. Ie, if you're xx minutes late/early into a hub do this with CI or Mach, if you're xx minutes late/early on outbounds do this, etc. Perhaps it would officially relinquish too much judgment authority to us peons?
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 10:04 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HazCan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: headbanging
Posts: 954
Default

I'm in the green for 817 lbs. in 2008. Like the FAA, I'm here to help.

Haz
HazCan is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 11:50 AM
  #25  
Avoiding Memphis
 
pilot141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: Intl Feeder Jet
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy
Who are "they"?

So, what you're saying is the company doesn't really care if we divert...as long as it's saving them fuel?

OK then...
"They" are the fuel sense bean-counters. Fuel savings from the Fuel Sense initiative goes into the positive column; diverts (and all that wasted fuel) do not count against these numbers.
pilot141 is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 11:54 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlybyKnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by pilot141
If you divert (because, say, we are landing south at The planet and ATC is behind the power curve) that does NOT count against the Fuel Sense numbers.
They do not take penalties when they tweak the fuel too tightly and we end up bailing out to maintain a margin of safety.
So there is no correlation between fuel sense and diverts or a leave early but arrive on time policy. There was also no [immediate] correlation between reduced potable water supplies and burned-up coffee makers either.

So who's in charge of connecting all the dots anyway??
FlybyKnite is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 11:59 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Ahhh yes. Of course, the "fuel sense bean counters". Is there a VP of fuel sense bean counter? How would one contact these individuals?

You guys are smokin some pretty good crack if you think this compnay doesn't care if even 1 airplane diverts due to lack of fuel reserves. Or for any reason, for that matter. I guarantee you that someone must answer for that.

Maybe, its the "low fuel divert bean counters".
Busboy is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 12:16 PM
  #28  
Avoiding Memphis
 
pilot141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: Intl Feeder Jet
Posts: 504
Default

I'm not smoking anything. I'm just relaying what was said in recurrent when someone asked about where diverts go in the big Fuel Sense scheme of things.

I sure hope that someone somewhere connects the dots, but the answer that day did not inspire confidence.
pilot141 is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 01:41 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JethroFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B767 Capt.
Posts: 616
Default

Not that there is enough chest beating around the FedEx property I really don't care about my fuel sense history.

Just do your job. Do it by the book or when necessary use common sense.

If the history helps the n/c (who work for us, YOU READING THIS GUYS?) then good. If cutting fuel is gonna compromise safety....I'm not with it.

Everyone is really gonna be thrilled when the alternates are removed.


Rant mode is now disabled.
JethroFDX is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 04:31 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

Hey, if you divert early, doesn't that save several thousand pounds of gas?

Just imagine how much money we could save the company if everybody landed somewhere short of memphis
kronan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Min Fuel
Major
44
08-26-2008 05:26 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 12:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices